Interfectum
Member
Microsoft: Lets find more ways to put ads in front of gamers.
Valve: Lets find a better way to make a TV dashboard.
Valve: Lets find a better way to make a TV dashboard.
Is this an elaborated joke by all of you ?
It doesn't looks practical at all.
Virtual keyboard all the way.
Microsoft: Lets find more ways to put ads in front of gamers while charging them for it.
Valve: Lets find a better way to make a TV dashboard and have it be free for everyone.
Before I get myself too confused, can someone just clarify if it's possible to actually get this today (can you enable the beta in settings)?
Real Keyboard on coffee table FTW.
Own multiple copies of a game to play split-screen, huh? Fuck off.Oh my.
![]()
In the context of the previous week, this is abso-fucking-lutely hilarious. Or it would be, if it wasn't flagrantly and horrifically hypocritical.
Regardless, it's good to know that Valve are against walled gardens when it comes to people who have already made it over the wall. You fight the power you crazy rebel you!
Yes, because mutiple thousand dollar certification fees, plus fees per patch after the first patch, are comparable to a $100 charitable donation with free patching and no lengthy certification processes thereafter (if accepted onto Steam).![]()
In the context of the previous week, this is abso-fucking-lutely hilarious. Or it would be, if it wasn't flagrantly and horrifically hypocritical.
Regardless, it's good to know that Valve are against walled gardens when it comes to people who have already made it over the wall. You fight the power you crazy rebel you!
Own multiple copies of a game to play split-screen, huh? Fuck off.
Own multiple copies of a game to play split-screen, huh? Fuck off.
Yes, because mutiple thousand dollar certification fees, plus fees per patch after the first patch, are comparable to a $100 charitable donation with free patching and no lengthy certification processes thereafter (if accepted onto Steam).
I misread it then? Seemed like it was saying each person could log into his or her own account and use it to play.I don't think that's the point at all.
Own multiple copies of a game to play split-screen, huh? Fuck off.
Are there still devs QQing over not being to get $100 worth of donations or from selling their game on their own site?![]()
In the context of the previous week, this is abso-fucking-lutely hilarious. Or it would be, if it wasn't flagrantly and horrifically hypocritical.
Regardless, it's good to know that Valve are against walled gardens when it comes to people who have already made it over the wall. You fight the power you crazy rebel you!
Own multiple copies of a game to play split-screen, huh? Fuck off.
That is clever as hell. Can the console manufacturers please take note?
I'd be very happy if they bind Steam overlay button on Xbox 360 guide button
I don't think Microsoft likes you rebinding that particular button. Or at least it doesn't seem to be a valid bind option in a lot of games. Which is annoying since the button does nothing in Windows except show a very inaccurate battery gauge.I'd be very happy if they bind Steam overlay button on Xbox 360 guide button
![]()
Do they? How do I enable it on PS3? Typing on the QWERTY onscreen keyboard takes forever.This might have already been mentioned, but the PSP and PS3 use a similar approach.
This might have already been mentioned, but the PSP and PS3 use a similar approach.
I'd be very happy if they bind Steam overlay button on Xbox 360 guide button
Are there still devs QQing over not being to get $100 worth of donations or from selling their game on their own site?
Custom driver would be perfect. If Microsoft wouldn't bitchin' of courseI don't think Microsoft likes you rebinding that particular button
If they can't get together $100 (£62) to get their game on Greenlight, then I would argue it shouldn't be on Steam anyway. It's not as if Steam is the ONLY way they can sell their game - if the game is even remotely good they should easily be able to make back the submission fee at the very least from selling it through their own website.Based on the number of articles I've read about the topic in the last few days? Yeah, I'd say there's a sizable contingent of people out there disappointed with Valve's decision.
Based on the number of articles I've read about the topic in the last few days? Yeah, I'd say there's a sizable contingent of people out there disappointed with Valve's decision.
And there's a sizeable portion of developers who realize that the $100 classicism debate is a strawman, and that if you can't even get $100 worth of interest from people, it probably shouldn't be on Steam to begin with. And it's been debated to death in this thread, where you might want to go instead of threadcrapping and derailing here.Based on the number of articles I've read about the topic in the last few days? Yeah, I'd say there's a sizable contingent of people out there disappointed with Valve's decision.
what? I'd rather have a selection of user picked games that are good, then a wall of crap to sift trough. 100 dollars is peanuts compared to the revenue you could receive if your game gets published. Anyway, that's all I want to say about this and i'd like you to take the discussion you are trying to create, in a thread of its own. This is a discussion about Big picture mode, and not about how hypocritical valve is.![]()
In the context of the previous week, this is abso-fucking-lutely hilarious. Or it would be, if it wasn't flagrantly and horrifically hypocritical.
Regardless, it's good to know that Valve are against walled gardens when it comes to people who have already made it over the wall. You fight the power you crazy rebel you!
Don't get me wrong - those are hardly just, and are why games like Fez remain unpatched despite a developer willingness to do so.
But they can't go throwing around words like "walled garden" and "openness" a week after launching a giant gatekeeping mechanism like Greenlight. It's outright disingenuous.
Why has someone not thought of this before?
![]()
If they can't get together $100 (£62) to get their game on Greenlight, then I would argue it shouldn't be on Steam anyway. It's not as if Steam is the ONLY way they can sell their game - if the game is even remotely good they should easily be able to make back the submission fee at the very least from selling it through their own website.
probably because someone did?
i remember some old homebrew for the first Xbox doing the keyboard in that same way.
but it's Valve so it's irrelevant
Can someone explain why I would want or be interested in this? I have not been following this project.
I like the on-screen "keyboard":
![]()
Edit: Great minds etc.![]()
Lawsuit incoming?
So help me understand this. Is this basically a consolised Steam UI for tv? So, I have to hook up my pc to the tv to properly experience it?