Black-Wind
Member
This would make a great haiku with some tweaking.
IF you want to haiku it for me then be my guest

This would make a great haiku with some tweaking.
What's wrong with gamers crying about purchasing a new system for a sequel? I didn't whine because I had to purchase MGS4 on a new system instead of PS2 :/
The game was never a system seller. Bayonetta has sold 1.35 million, which is not strong enough considering the userbase.
Also, considering the fact that the game has no multiplayer mode (very difficult to successfully implement with these kind of games), the lasting appeal/replay value was pretty short, and people moved on quickly.
From a purely business stand point, what Nintendo is doing here is extremely risky.
EDIT:
A quick sales comparison:
Bayo: 1.35 M
Devil May Cry 4: 2.60 M
Ninja Gaiden 2: sold > 1.00 M
MGS4 was on a completely different hardware generation to the PS2.
Most of these seem like reasonable reactions if nothing else on the Wii U interests them.
it's not that unreasonable to be a little annoyed that bayonetta 2 is going to be an exclusive, not everyone wants to buy the WiiU(just for one game) or has the money to buy a new console
I'm pretty confused. If they announced, say Chrono Trigger 2 with all the original creators (or as many as were still alive) but it would only be for the X-Box 720, I'd just be pretty happy that I was getting another Chrono Trigger.
Can anybody explain the rage?
There's little doubt that whatever game produced would run on the PS3 and 360, with little concession, unless they go all out with tablet features - but I really can't see that happening in an actiony game.WiiU is a next gen system.
I'm pretty confused. If they announced, say Chrono Trigger 2 with all the original creators (or as many as were still alive) but it would only be for the X-Box 720, I'd just be pretty happy that I was getting another Chrono Trigger.
Can anybody explain the rage?
I doubt Nintendo is betting the farm on Bayonetta. It is just a decent and available exclusive to add onto their platform. They also have longer term interests in forming partnerships with other companies.
I'm pretty confused. If they announced, say Chrono Trigger 2 with all the original creators (or as many as were still alive) but it would only be for the X-Box 720, I'd just be pretty happy that I was getting another Chrono Trigger.
Can anybody explain the rage?
There's little doubt that whatever game produced would run on the PS3 and 360, with little concession, unless they go all out with tablet features - but I really can't see that happening in an actiony game.
I wouldn't be surprised if they're just reusing whatever was already done for the PS360.
Can anybody explain the rage?
it's not that unreasonable to be a little annoyed that bayonetta 2 is going to be an exclusive, not everyone wants to buy the WiiU(just for one game) or has the money to buy a new console
Do we have to repeat that this game was dead before Nintendo picked it up for every page?
Frustration is technically more justifiable this time actually - considering this move actually restricts the audience.Remember when FFXIII went from exclusive to multiplatform and everyone was excited the game would reach a greater audience?
Do we have to repeat that this game was dead before Nintendo picked it up for every page?
There's little doubt that whatever game produced would run on the PS3 and 360, with little concession, unless they go all out with tablet features - but I really can't see that happening in an actiony game.
I wouldn't be surprised if they're just reusing whatever was already done for the PS360.
WiiU is a next gen system.
I wouldn't be against seeing what Platinum Games could do with some of Nintendo's franchises.So how long till Platinum goes second party with the big n and all those ips become Nintendo exclusive?
So how long till Platinum goes second party with the big n and all those ips become Nintendo exclusive?
I'm not sure I want a Vanquish sequel without any Mikami involvement.
So how long till Platinum goes second party with the big n and all those ips become Nintendo exclusive?
They wouldn't become Nintendo exclusive because Plat doesn't own the Ip's. Sega own the majority and Konami owns Metal Gear.
Wait. Was this the only major new software announcement from the conferences? (Besides COD which was a given.)
Wait. Was this the only major new software announcement from the conferences? (Besides COD which was a given.)
I'd be perfectly content if both sides would compromise.
WiiU is a next gen system, and it's also only marginally more powerful than the generation before. Which is a step up from the Wii. Which in some ways was weaker than the Xbox.
The game was never a system seller. Bayonetta has sold 1.35 million, which is not strong enough considering the userbase.
Also, considering the fact that the game has no multiplayer mode (very difficult to successfully implement with these kind of games), the lasting appeal/replay value was pretty short, and people moved on quickly.
From a purely business stand point, what Nintendo is doing here is extremely risky.
EDIT:
A quick sales comparison:
Bayo: 1.35 M
Devil May Cry 4: 2.60 M
Ninja Gaiden 2: sold > 1.00 M
So how long till Platinum goes second party with the big n and all those ips become Nintendo exclusive?
except for the fact that there's been a lot of talk of everyone passing on this game before Nintendo jumped in
in a world where it's this or nothing i'll take this
Has someone compiled a list of the freakouts in this thread? From what I can tell, there are about twenty times less freakouts than the people mocking them.
Wasn't there only one "death threat" too? Not to say the kid wasn't stupid, but to say that Kamiya is "getting death threats" seems incredibly exaggerated, like everything else.
They wouldn't become Nintendo exclusive because Plat doesn't own the Ip's. Sega own the majority and Konami owns Metal Gear.
Mikami made Reisdent Evil...Then Kamiya stepped in and made RE2 which was better in everyway.
Just as Kamiya made DMC and then Itsuno stepped up and made DMC3. Bayo 2 and Vanquish 2 could be far more amazing without them now that the ground work has been laid.
Holy shit this is hilarious!
It's a next gen system. But this [Bayonetta 2] is, as far as I'm aware, essentially a PS360 port.I'd be perfectly content if both sides would compromise.
WiiU is a next gen system, and it's also only marginally more powerful than the generation before. Which is a step up from the Wii. Which in some ways was weaker than the Xbox.
Monster Hunter in the west, both Wii U and 3DS versions.
Oh, forgot about that.Monster Hunter Tri G Ultimate with online play and cross play and transfer saves with 3DS version coming to all regions.
Different situation.Wii is also a next generation console by that logic, for it is more powerful than a Gamecube. However, many people don't consider the Wii as a next generation system because the X360 and PS3 are much more powerful consoles.
If the X720 and PS4 are also much more powerful than the WiiU, then the cycle repeats for another 5-8 years.
It's very encouraging. Indicates Nintendo's willingness to go out on a limb and fund beloved games and IP that will get gamers excited even though it is unlikely to make a profit. It means Ninty is willing to play the long game and lose a little bit of money now to ensure that they regain some of the PS360 crowd.
This is going to be happening alot more once some smaller, but beloved and talented studios are confronted with the costs of PS4720 development. Nintendo can step in and offer a sane alternative, and cover publishing themselves. A game like Bayonetta probably never gets greenlit in the first place for PS4 the way the economy is and given Japans relative lack of regard for bleeding edge graphics, Nintendo stands to gain alot of good games this way, it is an investment that they are counting on to pay off int he future, even if it doesn't make money now.