I am sure most gamers buy the games they defend. I fully intend to buy an Atom tablet and I don't ACTIVELY defend the other variants of W8 tablets.
I think its a productive rule if we live by it.
10" Widescreen tablets kinda suck to type on directly in my experience. I think a separate device is necessary.
I disagree. Because I usually only own one product in a certain category doesn't mean all others are shit.
And because I'd rather have a Surface Pro (whether I'll be able to afford it is another question) doesn't mean that all criticism levelled at the RT has merit.
Sometimes you have discussions for fun. Sometimes you have discussions where you haven't actually made your own decisions (as it's very often the case with gaming stuff). Sometimes you like stuff even if you won't actually buy it. If you don't go into flaming fanboy mode, it doesn't mean you won't be able to have a productive discussion because of it
I think its a easy way to tell a fan of a product from a fan of a company. *Shrug*
I think its a easy way to tell a fan of a product from a fan of a company. *Shrug*
So if someone posts a pre-order, will you stop posting for a month?
If you post screenshot of your order, I will stop posting in this thread.![]()
But can you use them as a skateboard?
good point. hey, so does Surface RT skateboard have the screen up or screen down? i ask because then you can skate while using a maps app if the screen is up... wait, Surface RT has GPS hardware, right?
edit: soooooooooooooo according to the spec sheets on the microsoft website, Surface doesn't have GPS hardware!?
are they fucking serious?!
good point. hey, so does Surface RT skateboard have the screen up or screen down? i ask because then you can skate while using a maps app if the screen is up... wait, Surface RT has GPS hardware, right?
edit: soooooooooooooo according to the spec sheets on the microsoft website, Surface doesn't have GPS hardware!?
are they fucking serious?!
Well, it would probably be limited in it's value by the lack of 3G/4G/LTE/whatever.
Still rather stupid.
Yeah, that is pretty bad. VaporMg was cited as the reason there is no NFC, I wonder if the casing prevents GPS from working too?
Well, it would probably be limited in it's value by the lack of 3G/4G/LTE/whatever.
Still rather stupid.
Well, but what about WiFi? I might be clueless here, but how would NFC not work when WiFi does?
Yep
Up to 8 hours battery
Tegra 3
Low resolution screen
No GPS
Roughly 20gb free out of 32gb after installed apps and OS
2200 apps vs 250,000
Premium pricing
The Wifi ipad doesnt have GPS either and unless we have reports of Surface being slow I dont see why Tegra 3 is a problem.
Isn't the Tegra 3 processor generally considered a good processor for tablets?
As a gadget junkie I really like this. The build quality looks unmatched. Coming from the ipad universe I really like the SD expansion and USB port. Also like the fact that any apps I buy on my Windows 8 machine would be available on this tablet.
So Windows RT does support pens.
I am really thinking about snagging one just for development of these RT apps. C# is a fuck ton nicer than shitty ass objective C.
Any in-depth reviews yet? I know its too soon but I need to read more about this, Im trying to justify that ridiculous price.
You dont mean developing on the RT tablet itself though? Unless they are making a Visual Studio RT
NDA won't be up until next week, afaik.Any in-depth reviews yet? I know its too soon but I need to read more about this, Im trying to justify that ridiculous price.
He probably means deploying and testing the ARM build of his app.You dont mean developing on the RT tablet itself though? Unless they are making a Visual Studio RT
You dont mean developing on the RT tablet itself though? Unless they are making a Visual Studio RT
the only major ones that don't are the Kindle and Nook. the vast majority of Android tablets have GPS hardware built in.Wifi only iPad doesn't have GPS either. I'd think plenty of other wifi only tablets are the same.
dedicated map applications, usb hotspots and tethering exist.Well, it would probably be limited in it's value by the lack of 3G/4G/LTE/whatever.
Still rather stupid.
Yeah, that is pretty bad. VaporMg was cited as the reason there is no NFC, I wonder if the casing prevents GPS from working too?
Seems like Microsoft put the focus on design and materials over specs/functionality. I'll go play with it in store, it better damn well feel and look amazing.
Edot: Didn't realize WiFi tablets typically lack GPS.
So what makes up most of the cost of the unit?
It's kinda sad that Apple's iPad seems like better value here. Same Tegra 3 as in the $200 Nexus 7(?), resolution is so bad that it's barely better than the Nexus 7/iPad 2/iPad Mini, and storage space that's closer to 16GB than the 32GB that you paid for.
I wonder if people will start developing for the ARM version of Windows? Can you install programs for the desktop? Would be interesting if we start seeing fragmentation happen on the desktop side of Windows between ARM and x86 now... lol
I wonder if people will start developing for the ARM version of Windows? Can you install programs for the desktop? Would be interesting if we start seeing fragmentation happen on the desktop side of Windows between ARM and x86 now... lol
I wonder if people will start developing for the ARM version of Windows? Can you install programs for the desktop? Would be interesting if we start seeing fragmentation happen on the desktop side of Windows between ARM and x86 now... lol
The iPad has it beat, no doubt, in resolution and apps available (currently). Anything else is arguable.
Hey I tried to answer this resolution question for another post, but it got stuck.. So I will try here:
Hey this is Stevie. Screen resolution is one component of perceived detail. The true measure of resolvability of a screen called Modulation Transfer Function (MTF), not Pixels. MTF is a combination of both contrast and resolution. There are over a dozen subsystems that effect this MTF number.. Most folks just focus on one number out of dozens that effect perceived detail. Without good contrast resolution decreases. Check out contrast sensitivity of the human eye graph (http://www.telescope-optics.net/images/eye_contrast.PNG ) and if you want more see the links below. Basically, as resolution/DPI increases the eye has becomes less sensitive. So as a result, the amount of light in a room and the reflections off the screen have a huge effect on the contrast of the display. In fact, a small amount of reflection can greatly reduce contrast and thus the perceived resolution of the display. With the ClearType Display technology we took a 3 pronged approach to maximize that perceived resolution and optimize for battery life, weight, and thickness. First prong, Microsoft has the best pixel rendering technology in the industry (cleartype 1.0 and 2.0) .. these are exclusive and unique to Windows, it smooths text regardless of pixel count. Second, we designed a custom 10.6” high-contrast wide-angle screen LCD screen. Lastly we optically bonded the screen with the thinnest optical stack anywhere on the market.. something which is more commonly done on phones we are doing on Surface. While this is not official, our current Cleartype measurements on the amount of light reflected off the screen is around 5.5%-6.2%, the new IPad has a measurement of 9.9% mirror reflections (see the displaymate link: http://www.displaymate.com/iPad_ShootOut_1.htm). Doing a side by side with the new iPad in a consistently lit room, we have had many people see more detail on Surface RT than on the Ipad with more resolution.
Some more links to share if you want to know more… (http://www.normankoren.com/Tutorials/MTF.html)... Also This is a great book to read if you really want to get into it: http://www.amazon.com/dp/0819434965/?tag=neogaf0e-20 or more here http://alexandria.tue.nl/extra2/9901043.pdf
been thinking about the surface a wee bit, if the build quality is really up to scratch as the ads make it look, this really does destroy the ipad in pretty much everyway EXCEPT for apps. Which is admittedly a really large deal. Not one that concerns me as I'm getting the pro and can wait some years for the appstore to catch up.
Apple must be quite worried about this though, because app development may be low at the start, but being that they have the desktop to fall back on, MS can probably dump a bunch of their considerable programming resources into bolstering the app store themselves. Interested to see the first official apps coming out of the app store from MS themselves.
I use win 8 daily at home, Have NEVER yet downloaded an app from the store (but I'm using on a desktop which really feels kind of pointless).
the designers just did an AMA on reddit, here is what they said about the resolution question.
from
http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/11kyja/iam_panos_panay_gm_of_microsoft_surface_amaa_ask/
I don't know how true the stuff is
http://blogs.office.com/b/office-next/archive/2012/07/18/using-the-new-office-with-touch.aspxThat's something I hadn't thought of. I don't suppose we'll know until the device launches, but how easy will it be to use Office without a keyboard and trackpad?
been thinking about the surface a wee bit, if the build quality is really up to scratch as the ads make it look, this really does destroy the ipad in pretty much everyway EXCEPT for apps. Which is admittedly a really large deal. Not one that concerns me as I'm getting the pro and can wait some years for the appstore to catch up.
Apple must be quite worried about this though, because app development may be low at the start, but being that they have the desktop to fall back on, MS can probably dump a bunch of their considerable programming resources into bolstering the app store themselves. Interested to see the first official apps coming out of the app store from MS themselves.
I use win 8 daily at home, Have NEVER yet downloaded an app from the store (but I'm using on a desktop which really feels kind of pointless).
the designers just did an AMA on reddit, here is what they said about the resolution question.
from
http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/11kyja/iam_panos_panay_gm_of_microsoft_surface_amaa_ask/
I don't know how true the stuff is
That's kinda silly to say. It's hard to compare them outright, since you have multiple models of each, but let's go by price point for this one:
$599 will get you:
32gb Surface tablet w/keyboard and cover
32gb new iPad
You mention the space being a concern, but again, ~20gb of space after Office 2013/default apps installed isn't that bad. Not to mention, you can use a Micro SD card with the Surface.
If resolution is that big of a deal for you, then it might be a dealbreaker, but I don't consider the Surface's resolution to be "so bad". The processor is weaker, but Windows 8 has a smaller processor/resource footprint than Windows 7, so I don't think it will be a huge deal.
The iPad has it beat, no doubt, in resolution and apps available (currently). Anything else is arguable.
I don't see anything about it that would sway an average consumer from the iPad to the Surface RT when they cost the same and when the iPad is better than the Surface RT in almost every way.
Lol. It's as if the op doesn't exist.![]()
Sorry.
No, you can not install desktop applications on a Windows RT device. As stated a billion times in this thread and obviously in the OP.
The ARM version of a metro app is basically one click away for developers.
Really? I would say resolution and some apps (I still say gaming on day 1 will be better than ipad with the announced xbox lineup) are the only things the ipad has over surface.... in every other way surface rt is better even for the general consumer imo.
Don't get me wrong, I've stated multiple times that I am very interested in picking up the Surface Pro. It's the RT that looks like pretty poor value compared to the iPad. Honestly, I don't see anything about it that would sway an average consumer from the iPad to the Surface RT when they cost the same and when the iPad is better than the Surface RT in almost every way. We're just starting to get high DPI/PPI screens on everything nowadays and for some reason Microsoft is going backwards.
HTC has a 5" PHONE with 1080p. The iPad 3 with its insane resolution has been out for more than half a year. The 4.65" 720p Galaxy Nexus is a year old already.
But whatever, that's my POV and I honestly would not recommend the Surface RT to anyone I know.
FYI: I own an S3, Nexus 7, iPad 3, and am using Windows 8 via Dreamspark on my PC before anyone calls me an Apple fanboy.
I'm looking at it from the tech spec level and everything favors the iPad (ironic, considering it's Apple).
Really? I would say resolution and some apps (I still say gaming on day 1 will be better than ipad with the announced xbox lineup) are the only things the ipad has over surface.... in every other way surface rt is better even for the general consumer imo.