Someone tried.
![]()
Props for the quantified anti-semitism, BTW.
Why so many negatives for being a scientist. that's bullshit homie
Someone tried.
![]()
Props for the quantified anti-semitism, BTW.
This.
Any slight whiff of racism by a white person and you will get buried by the media, and rightly so ....... but to say a white person can say what they want without fear or retribution is a lie.
All in all the son of a presidential candidate says he wanted to swing for his fathers opponent, seemingly in an off the cuff joking manner.
The only time race is was brought into it was by the author of the article.
Why so many negatives for being a scientist. that's bullshit homie
Not relevant to the point.Well, has there EVER been a Latino or Asian candidate?
+130! Suck it short, lesbian, black scientists!Someone tried.
![]()
Props for the quantified anti-semitism, BTW.
Not really true at all. People have huge careers launched off the backs of racism.. Rush, Beck and so on..
If say Sam Jackson pulled a Mel Gibson he would never work again..
Someone tried.
![]()
Props for the quantified anti-semitism, BTW.
Someone tried.
![]()
Props for the quantified anti-semitism, BTW.
First the USA would NEVER have a latino candidate, but yes, I think there would be more media attention simply because they are not white.If an Asian or Latino candidate's son had said they wanted to take a swing at a white candidate, you think there would have been more media attention? How do you know this?
I don't know about there being inherit racial implications to what the guy said, but it is certainly true that if Obama had an adult son who said the opposite thing, Fox News would FLIP THE FUCK OUT FOR WEEKS about it.
Not relevant to the point.
Rush Limbaugh still eats. Mike Savage. Fox News. the Republican Party...This.
Any slight whiff of racism by a white person and you will get buried by the media, and rightly so ....... but to say a white person can say what they want without fear or retribution is a lie.
All in all the son of a presidential candidate says he wanted to swing for his fathers opponent, seemingly in an off the cuff joking manner.
The only time race is was brought into it was by the author of the article.
There's no way you're going to convince me that someone named "Tagg" is privileged in any way.
Really now...See my previous post that you quoted, in which I posed some questions.
The author says if the roles were reversed that the media would be on fire and the black man talking about punching Mitt Romney would be demonized. He says that the reality of that is an example of white privilege.
If any of my questions are true, then how is what the author says not true?
There's no way you're going to convince me that someone named "Tagg" is privileged in any way.
Someone tried.
![]()
Props for the quantified anti-semitism, BTW.
Not really true at all. People have huge careers launched off the backs of racism.. Rush, Beck and so on..
If say Sam Jackson pulled a Mel Gibson he would never work again..
Stop referencing the syntax of what Tagg did or didn't say, or did or didn't mean. It has nothing to do with the point.
Are black people regarded differently in American society? Why is that? Does it have a historical context? If any of the questions I just posed above are true, than how is what the author of the article said untrue?
Ice Cube has a song called 'White Cave Bitch', where he talks about how much he hates white women, and it didn't seem to hurt his career.
Wacky name -1000?
Last I checked this thread (and my post) was about a particular case and its implications, not white privilege generally.Completely relevant to the point of white privilege
Last I checked this thread (and my post) was about a particular case and its implications, not white privilege generally.
But if you were interjecting just to make that separate point, I totally agree that it's relevant (mixed with other factors such as proportion of population).
Ice Cube has a song called 'White Cave Bitch', where he talks about how much he hates white women, and it didn't seem to hurt his career.
Barry Bonds vs Lance Armstrong
Barry was never given the benefit of the doubt. Lance given all the benefit of the doubt. Could be racial, or it could be that Barry was a notorious douchebag.
Conversely, Eminem's career took a hit over the controversy of him using the word "faggot" so often.
Barry was a twig for years, and then he suddenly ballooned up. Of course people were going to be suspicious.
Conversely, Eminem's career took a hit over the controversy of him using the word "faggot" so often.
Barry was a twig for years, and then he suddenly ballooned up. Of course people were going to be suspicious.
what hit? lot of people jawed about it, but how did it negatively impact him? He did his duo with Elton, made a movie and won an oscar. the controversy probably helped his record sales.
Hip-Hop is unique in the standard that you can say almost anything..selling crack? OK! pimping hoes? OK! Not using your AK-47? OK!
Hip-Hop is unique in the standard that you can say almost anything..selling crack? OK! pimping hoes? OK! Not using your AK-47? OK!
Unless you're Common and you're invited to the White House. Then it's the end of the world.
good thing we (and the article) are talking about the freedoms and benefits provided by white privilege and not racism then, huh?Wow, what a terrible article in the OP. Nothing the guy said was remotely racist at all.
Hold up.
I was gonna do the whole "conservative troll" bit, but there are people that aren't agreeing with what the article said?
In a nation that has an unnatural fear of young black men?
Where Trayvon Martin happened?
Where Blacks and Mexicans cannot wear hoodies because they will look like gang members?
Where Barack Obama is accused of being born and raised in Kenya and a secret Muslim?
Where there are shirts worn at rallies that say "put the White back in White House?"
Where a state politician thinks Blacks should be thankful for slavery and gets to keep his job?
Like, for realz? You guys think that if one of Barack's daughters said she wanted to clock Mitt a few weeks ago, the media wouldn't be shitting all over it?
I dont think that op is a good example of white privilege, it's just some dickhead running his mouth. but on the general topic bout white privilege, it aint about having a silver spoon its about not having to put up with the kind of shit related to being a minority.
Unless you're Common and you're invited to the White House. Then it's the end of the world.
Barry Bonds vs Lance Armstrong
Barry was never given the benefit of the doubt. Lance given all the benefit of the doubt. Could be racial, or it could be that Barry was a notorious douchebag.
good thing we (and the article) are talking about the freedoms and benefits provided by white privilege and not racism then, huh?
One of the hallmarks of White Privilege is the unquestioned and largely unchallenged assumption that white people can say heinous things about people of color without blowback or even mild criticism
And it would have zero to do with race and 100% to do with which party the respective people are in.
![]()
Tagg Romney, grandson of George Romney, son of Mitt Romney, is the latest flesh-and-blood embodiment of White Privilege on the national presidential stage. Though that stage has historically been a catwalk for the whitest and most privileged in the world, Tagg is in a class few achieve. With his lineage and his inherited wealth he equals George W. Bush when it comes to getting advantages by virtue of nothing more than whose crotch he popped out of in the hospital delivery room.
Now, thanks to his comments yesterday, he has surpassed even Bush, becoming not just an image of White Privilege – but an example of how that privilege quietly operates in too much of America.
In a post-debate interview with a North Carolina radio station, Tagg was asked about his visceral reaction to President Obama, and he said his first thought was that he wanted to “jump out of your seat and you want to rush down to the stage and take a swing at him.” He then laughed and added, “But you know you can’t do that because, well, first because there’s a lot of Secret Service between you and him.”
One of the hallmarks of White Privilege is the unquestioned and largely unchallenged assumption that white people can say heinous things about people of color without blowback or even mild criticism – things that people of color rarely dare to say about white people, for fear of serious retribution. Tagg – aka Mr. White Privilege – proves the point perfectly. He feels totally comfortable fantasizing about committing physical violence against an African American man. And remember, he’s not just any white guy pondering such grotesque dreams. On the contrary, he’s one of the public faces of a national presidential campaign appearing in a public media interview, meaning White Privilege has made him feel so comfortable airing such notions, that he didn’t hesitate to whimsically broadcast them to thousands of voters.
To know that’s a reflection of the new intensity of White Privilege is to witness the relatively muted reaction to the episode from a media that otherwise treats every microscopic nuance of the presidential race as a “breaking news” event. What’s more, this is a country where, whether in an election season or not, any threat of violence against any president of either party is a potential federal crime and thus covered as a major news story. That is, of course, before Obama, a black man, became president, and representatives of his white opponent started joking about physically harming him.
If that’s not enough proof that this episode is a profound example of the pervasiveness of White Privilege, then simply go through the mental exercise of switching the races. Ask yourself: Would the media reaction be similarly muted if a young black male relative of Obama appeared on a radio show and publicly fantasized about violently bludgeoning Mitt Romney? No, it would be the opposite. It would be a multi-day, above-the-fold, 100-point-typeface story initially fueled by Drudge, Fox News and right-wing radio hosts, and then pervading the network news shows. We’d soon see headlines about security beefing up around Romney and his entourage, as staid Face the Nation and Meet the Press panels – populated by mostly white faces, of course – paternalistically lamented the “race issue” in America.
Now sure, Tagg maybe wouldn’t actually bludgeon Obama to a bloody pulp if given the chance. Most likely, he’d refrain from doing so out of aristocratic respect for what he calls “the nature of the process” – and even more likely, he’d respond to criticism of his remark by simply saying he wasn’t being “serious.” But what Tagg would do in the secret confines of his fictional Obama beat-down chamber is not important, and using the “not serious” defense only underscores the White Privilege at work, for that defense wouldn’t be accepted if the races were reversed.
Thus, it all comes back to White Privilege. This little episode and the lack of reaction to it confirms Tagg’s – and much of White America’s – unspoken day-to-day assumption that there should be two standards of acceptable decorum: one for privileged white people, another for everyone else.
http://www.salon.com/2012/10/18/tagg_romney_mr_white_privilege/
Radion Interview:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mJBae24IVM
There are no words. This could easily past as satire.One of the hallmarks of White Privilege is the unquestioned and largely unchallenged assumption that white people can say heinous things about people of color without blowback or even mild criticism
Barry Bonds vs Lance Armstrong
Barry was never given the benefit of the doubt. Lance given all the benefit of the doubt. Could be racial, or it could be that Barry was a notorious douchebag.
Par for the course for Mormons? Paging ronito.
What part is talking about the freedoms and benefits provided by white privilege? If the guy had said anything remotely racist, he would be eviscerated in the media. Nothing pertaining to white privilege would grant him that freedom or benefit.
White privilege is about white being considered "neutral" or "default." It isn't about White people doing anything bad.
The privilege is that Tagg can say something like this as a joke without worrying about scaring anyone: there are no angry White man stereotypes for him to avoid. It won't prompt a discussion of violence in "White culture." He's just Tagg, some guy who made a joke. An individual speaking for himself.
If Obama had a 42 year old son you can bet he would not feel comfortable saying he wanted to punch Romney on national tv. He would know the stereotypes it would bring up, the dialogue it would start, etc.
By the way "minority disadvantage" does not mean the same thing as "White privilege." White privilege is White being default, so Tagg is "some guy", and if he was Black he would be "some Black guy." It has to be called White Privilege, or White Defaulting, or White as Neutral, or whatever, because that is what it means.
Haha, you got me.Lol when I saw your Comment, I figured it was about this topic before i clicked it. Fucking Exactly the reason why! smh
What a load of nonsense. I'm not sure which is more ridiculous - an entire piece based on "omg, Romney's son doesn't like Obama" or how that is now translated as indicative of a mindset based on racial/cultural norms. Rather than trying to convince the reader of his incomplete and generalised ambiguity, the author instead portrays himself/herself as having an obsession with 'the white man'. And this part,
There are no words. This could easily past as satire.
Someone tried.
Props for the quantified anti-semitism, BTW.
What a load of nonsense. I'm not sure which is more ridiculous - an entire piece based on "omg, Romney's son doesn't like Obama" or how that is now translated as indicative of a mindset based on racial/cultural norms. Rather than trying to convince the reader of his incomplete and generalised ambiguity, the author instead portrays himself/herself as having an obsession with 'the white man'. And this part,
There are no words. This could easily past as satire.