Or, it actually means handouts.
... to black people
Or, it actually means handouts.
Ha, agreed here.
I want to protect Isreal because they are the only democracy over there, they have nuclear weapons, and one of our only allies over there.
... to black people
Or to anybody qualifying for handouts.
I'm not sure if your answer or his is more disturbing. I sort of preferred my preconceptions... at least they made some sort of political sense to me.
Thanks all the same though. Very educational.
cool well some people don't want official policy especially concerning possible nuclear war to be based on 4000 year old disputes between nomads killing each other because they were told to by sky ghosts
... to black people
Look, we all know what they were trying to conjure with those accusations, and we all know what a good amount of these types of people think of when people talk about handouts. It's dog whistle racism.
I thought they were all coming from Texas.From PoliGAF
Unfortunatly, in some part (we can debate how big), some people probably think the way you described.
However,
You can have an intellectual discussion over entitlement reform, assistance programs, etc. and not be a racist.
No surprise? If that is supposed to be some sort of personal dig at me because of something I said in another thread, do me a favor and PM me about instead of being so passive aggressive, will ya?
I am a religious moderate conservative and have been around Christians all my life. I can tell you with absolute certainly that that is utter bullshit, and that the only reason the religious right is adamant about protecting Israel is because it is the land of the Jews, who are, Biblically speaking, God's chosen people. The Bible is comprised of the contents of the Tanakh and early Jewish-Christian books and letters. To call yourself a follower of Christ and not be a political ally of Israel would be heresy.
I thought they were all coming from Texas.
Some really interesting data in there, thanks.
On most political matters, do you consider yourself:
Moderate
total 41%
Obama 56%
Romney 41%
your contributions to the funny pics thread, if that was another megaman guy, apologies.
Sure, but they weren't having that discussion. They were accusing Obama of waiving the work requirement of welfare. That's a rather pointed (and completely false) accusation quite far from any real conversation on entitlement reform.
Texas has Austin. It can't be THAT crazy as long as a wonderful city like that exists.
No, that was me. Sorry you don't like my sense of humor, but this isn't the place for passive aggressive bitching about it, is it?
Or to anybody qualifying for handouts.
only passive agressive bitching about some imaginary double standard on this forum?
In the end, more than freedom, they wanted security. They wanted a comfortable life, and they lost it all security, comfort, and freedom. When the Athenians finally wanted not to give to society but for society to give to them, when the freedom they wished for most was freedom from responsibility, then Athens ceased to be free and was never free again."
Edward Gibbon
Like · · Share · about an hour ago ·
I really like this quote. I feel it ties in well to now. We shall see the last days defined in the next 4 years
about an hour ago · Like
Subject: A post-election epiphany: The real winner in campaign 2012
Like many of you, I've been very upset today with the outcome of the election. This article is what I needed to help me get things back in proper prospective. I hope it will do the same for you.
Words of wisdom by Ed Lauritsen & Hugh W Nibley
It is Election Night 2012, and I'm sitting here at my computer listening to Governor Romney's
concession speech, trying to come to grips with his defeat---our defeat. And into my mind comes
three interesting thoughts. The first comes with a scripture:
"Behold, I will hasten my work in its time." (D&C 88:73).
If the Lord's "work" is to "bring to pass the immortality and eternal life of man" (Moses 1:39),
and if that process begins by hearing about the Church and seeing its members, then the sooner and
the faster the greatest number of people can see and hear about the Latter-day Saints---especially about
exemplary Saints like the Romneys---the more the work is hastened. And though the Church has 55,000+
missionaries who are quietly and patiently roaming the world knocking on doors, the Lord has brought the
LDS Governor and his LDS family into the very homes of millions of people around the U.S. and the world
via TV, radio, and Internet for more than a year now---people who might never have received or accepted the
missionaries or LDS neighbors, let alone have learned about the LDS way of life. But now they have listened,
watched, and learned, and many of them will likely be more curious and receptive to the missionaries in the
future. And that also goes for many of the Evangelicals, Protestants, and Catholics who locked arms with the
Latter-Day Saints (thanks to Glenn Beck) during this long presidential campaign. Bottom line: the Romneys
lost a hard-fought political battle, but they---and the Church---won a decisive, long-awaited cultural and
spiritual victory in opening the minds and hearts of millions.
Another post-election thought: "Be careful what you pray for."
Had Romney won, it is highly doubtful that he and his team would have been able to rescue the nation's
wounded economy from the purposeful destruction that Obama has intentionally inflicted upon it, Obama
having done so in order to "fundamentally transform" our free enterprise system into a Socialist state. Had
Romney won, the only possible way to have saved the nation and its economy would have been to make
deep cuts in the welfare and entitlement programs---cuts that would have been branded "murderous,
discriminatory and racist" at every turn by the Liberal mainstream media. And the ever-increasing drumbeat
of these accusations over the next four years would have given license to thousands---perhaps millions---
of malcontents to take to the streets in "civil unrest" (aka anarchy). As such, Romney's never-ending vilification
in print and in the electronic media would have soon painted him---and his fellow Mormons---as the enemies
of America, with all the resulting antagonism, stress, and persecution of the Church, both at home and abroad.
As is, over the next four years, right-wing zealots---not Christian Conservatives--- will likely become increasingly
resistant, confrontational, and possibly violent in response to the creeping Socialism. Thus, "social unrest" may
begin at the other end of the political spectrum, likely precipitating equally violent responses from the pro-Socialist
masses.
And this foregoing scenario brings me to the third and final thought tonight, one which also was accompanied by the
written word, this time in the form of a powerful metaphor by Hugh Nibley. I close with it:
On the last night of a play, the whole cast and stage crew stay in the theater until the small, or not so small, hours of
the morning striking the old set. If there is to be a new opening soon, as the economy of the theater requires, it is
important that the new set should be in place and ready for the opening night; all the while the old set was finishing
its usefulness and then being taken down, the new set was rising in splendor to be ready for the drama that would
immediately follow. So it is with this world. It is not our business to tear down the old set---the agencies that do that
are already hard at work and very efficient---the set is coming down all around us with spectacular effect. Our business
is to see to it that the new set is well on the way for what is to come---and that means a different kind of politics, beyond
the scope of the tragedy that is now playing its closing night. We are preparing for the establishment of Zion.
Nibley, Hugh. Nibley on the Timely and the Timeless: Classic Essays of Hugh W. Nibley, Provo, Utah: Brigham Young
University Religious Studies Center, 1978, p. 302
And Dallas, and Houston which all voted more democrat.
That said, you are more than welcome to come on down to Brownsville, Del Rio, etc....they went very blue and I assure you, the area is insane. (In a unique way IMO).
Ready for some mormon tears/paranoia?
And no APF, 2004 wasn't similar to this election at all.
These tears are far more amazing and surreal than anything I've seen before.
I hadn't even noticed it :lolLoving that random tweet in Mexico
Similar? Absolutely. Equivalent? No.
It may shock many of you to know that Texas is actually not insane.
cool well some people don't want official policy especially concerning possible nuclear war to be based on 4000 year old disputes between nomads killing each other because they were told to by sky ghosts
Ha, agreed here.
I want to protect Isreal because they are the only democracy over there, they have nuclear weapons, and one of our only allies over there.
I sponsor ferrarichat.com, and the meltdowns there are particularly delightful:
http://ferrarichat.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=64
West Coast confirmed for less racist than East Coast?
It's probably because the West Coast has a lower population.
Yay for private forums
You are cruel in not sharing it with us. Press that print screen key, bro!
Eh, according to that map he should cut off the east coast completely.It's shit like that (map above) that makes me think, damn, Obama should just cut those fuckers off in Alabama and Mississippi. They already drag in more money on social assistance than anyone else.
What are they gonna do? Call him names? Say he's ruining the country? Oh dear
I said 'most of the time'. If you think that's too much, then: An awful lot of the time, 'hand outs' is code for 'black people'. Of all the things to be tit-for-tat about.
Eh, according to that map he should cut off the east coast completely.
Power outages are saving them from themselves.But the color of the Northeast states is beige, which I'd assume means lower frequency of racist tweets.