Bane, Darth Vader, The Emperor, Freddy Kreuger, The Joker. Just a mere utterence of their names conjurs up iconic memories and performances across various medias. Gary Mitchell conjurs up images of a drunk 70s frat boy
*Cut to kirk kneeling over dead spock*
GARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
*Cut to kirk kneeling over dead spock*
GARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
Star Trek will have the worst villian name of 2013. Let's look at that year's rogues gallery
The Mandarin, Malekth the Dark Elf, General ZOD, and....Gary Mitchell
They should just make him do a Wilhelm scream.
Gary Mitchell sounds like a guy who runs a tire store in downtown pittsburgh
You do realize that from what I understand, Khan is like the Sikh version of Gary, right?
What is people's problem with a normal name?
Why do you need some idiotic thirteen year old's wet dream of a badass called "DARK DOOM KRALOANOXUS THE DESTROYER OF EVERYTHING" to be satisfied by a villain?
Gary Mitchell's name is one of the best parts about his premise.
You do realize that from what I understand, Khan is like the Sikh version of Gary, right?
"Mitchell, Gary?"
"Nothing here."
"Ah, try my legal name."
"You should use your full name. I like that name, Khan."
What is people's problem with a normal name?
Why do you need some idiotic thirteen year old's wet dream of a badass called "DARK DOOM KRALOANOXUS THE DESTROYER OF EVERYTHING" to be satisfied by a villain?
What is people's problem with a normal name?
Why do you need some idiotic thirteen year old's wet dream of a badass called "DARK DOOM KRALOANOXUS THE DESTROYER OF EVERYTHING" to be satisfied by a villain?
I really hope it isn't Gary Mitchell so we don't end up like the last film where the bad guys motives were shown in a comic on the side and given about 3 minutes in the actual film. The general population probably wont care but I personally think it would be lazy to do it again, here is this bad guy and all his development happened off screen at some point but he is evil so lets get him!
Saying that, they would probably have to do something like that for Kahn I guess, but at least that is how Kahn was originally introduced in TOS and the Films, he had a backstory but his rivalry with Kirk happened all on screen before the movie.
Nope, but close. He owns Better Choice Roofing.
http://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2011/08/02/kd-investigators-woman-confront-scamming-roofer/
The problem is people who want Khan don't want Space Seed. They want Wrath of Khan. So if they went that way they'd still probably offload Khan's hatred of Kirk into a 9 minute before-the-title sequence.
It sounds more foreign, and therefore more sinister.
Hahah, I remember writing a "screenplay" for space tv show when I was in second grade. I never got past the terrifying airlock scenes, but the main character was called Blade McFlex or something equally as stupid.
Because in real life if you get super powers and go crazy your going to use a cool name not your actual name. That's dumb
If it is Gary Mitchell, what does he want revenge for? Dude's like a space god or something, isn't he?
If it is Gary Mitchell, what does he want revenge for? Dude's like a space god or something, isn't he?
I thought being space evil turns you British
If it is Gary Mitchell, what does he want revenge for? Dude's like a space god or something, isn't he?
The problem is people who want Khan don't want Space Seed. They want Wrath of Khan. So if they went that way they'd still probably offload Khan's hatred of Kirk into a 9 minute before-the-title sequence.
Space Seed would have been fine. It would have been so perfect to call the movie: "Star Trek II The Rise of Khan"
If it is Gary Mitchell, what does he want revenge for? Dude's like a space god or something, isn't he?
Kirk left him for dead out in space after he started going nuts.
If they were to do Khan I would hope that they try something new with the character, like having him team up with Kirk against Klingons or something. Make him the antihero instead of the villain.
For Kirk defeating him out at the edge of the galaxy and giving him a space burial (when he wasn't really dead). He's like Dr. Manhattan, except a petty asshole instead of indifferent to humanity.
Being British is one of the leading causes of space evil.
I kind of find it hard to believe it'd be either Mitchell or Khan. Seems like these characters have quite a bit of history (haven't seen TOS too much). Could it be adequately compressed into the film?
I kind of find it hard to believe it'd be either Mitchell or Khan. Seems like these characters have quite a bit of history (haven't seen TOS too much). Could it be adequately compressed into the film?
Star Trek II was the both the best and the worst thing to happen to Star Trek movies.
Thanks to Wrath of Khan, every single movie has to be about revenge to be popular, even though that's really not what Star Trek is about.
Seems like there's a giant line of dudes from every planet and timeline ever lined up to 'take revenge' on us, at least thats what every general plot of a Star Trek movie would have us believe.
I kind of find it hard to believe it'd be either Mitchell or Khan. Seems like these characters have quite a bit of history (haven't seen TOS too much). Could it be adequately compressed into the film?
Just read the NOLAN MOTHERFUCKING NORTH is in the movie.
HE better get some good screen time. HE would be a great Khan!
I will be very happy if they develop Khan somehow in this and then make him the full villain in 3. Even if it's just a tease like with the Joker card at the end of BB. Given the pay-off that result from planting Samuel L. Jackson in the early Marvel films, I will be kind of surprised if they don't develop or at least tease Khan in some way.The problem is people who want Khan don't want Space Seed. They want Wrath of Khan. So if they went that way they'd still probably offload Khan's hatred of Kirk into a 9 minute before-the-title sequence.
If it is Gary Mitchell the opening scene of the movie will show what happened to him. james Bond/Indiana Jones style