crimsonspider89
Banned
Yeah, the final exam and the first arc were really well done. The book was entirely character driven.
This.... is not at all.
This.... is not at all.
I liked the football issue. Was nice to see the interactions between both schools. But the highlight of the series was the first arc were you get to know everybody and the final exam where the students really became heroes.
supermanisdead said:The football game was one of the worst issues of the year! Avengers Academy doesn't hold a candle to the superior Avenger training series, Avengers: The Initiative.
It's weird that they're rebooting Guardians of the Galaxy like this now. You'd think they'd wait closer to the movie before doing this.
I READ Arena already. The book is horrendous.
I read it with an objective mind.
Arcade was nothing like Arcade with his usual puns and attitude and was not sporting his usual attire and was not shown as the cowardly person he is depicted as. He forgot all the character development of Hazmat and wrote Mettle without his humor or humility factored in. The dialogue of the new characters was monotone and established no difference in personality. And instead of being Battle Royal like where he introduces himself then lets the kids fight it out, instead they had him force the fight since they did not include any villains to be the antagonist of the story. The book suffers from all the issues I said it would suffer from.
So yeah. Book is utter trash.
Drax the Destroyer
- GotG Spoilers:Again, he's alive? He got blown to bits. In the Cancerverse, no less, where it would be impossible to cross over from.
does the first issue explain how darkhawk is in the book
Wheneveris alive, DraxThanoswill be so he can kill him
The rest are so dumb. I've never had a problem with reboots in the past, but that's because it's stuff that's super popular, and I've accepted that they're going to mess with it, but GOTG was a real niche thing forever. Cosmic in general was niche to most readers unless you're talking Galactus, Surfer, Thanos, and maybe Black Bolt and the InHumans.
It would be like if they said, 'Yeah, we want Beta Ray Bill in Thor 3... But he's not very marketable, so we're gonna remake him to look like Ryan Gosling'. Defeating the entire purpose of Bill. Just like this remake defeats the purpose of GOTG that they look like some 50s noir crazy coked up space outcasts.
I thought that guy was dead >_>
Lol emma
No, for the story to be successful there have to be antagonists WITHIN the students which there have not been. I am asking from Hopeless what other writers would of done. And within 22 pages, Gage gave us the character of all of his students as did Aaron and Hickman.
Difference is proctor showed up and killed a student out of the student not paying attention where Arcade killed to make the other students kill and fight. Every other subject material has an internal antagonist. That is what makes the story thrilling. Will the protagonist become like the antagonist present or will he rise above? None of that is present.
And no the book explains not how or why Darkhawk is in the book.
Uncanny X-men News
-Doctor Doom level villian to show up at some point
- double shipping
-uncanny #3 and/All new X-men #9 will cross over
-new hellfire club to show up
-will adress why their powers are funky
-new mutants to join book
-As for Magik, Bendis stated there was "some big, juicy stuff going on with her.
Badass Magneto
Lol emma
No for a story of this kind there has to be some kind of internal antagonist which pushes the protagonist to go evil which there is not. The internal antagonist job is to push the protagonist to cross the line.
So your logic is that he got just cause. And he had to sell the story in the first issue which he did not at all. Not just me, majority of people are repeating the same response I had. The story was bland, mischaracterization and none of the character development he promised but a mindless death where he did not even characterize hazmat or Mettle correct. I am sorry but his Arcade did not sound like Arcade at all. He made no puns and lacked his typical attire. You are saying wait to see but if you are creating a controversy story, you HAVE to sell the positive in the first issue. Remender did it with UXF. Hickman sold Johnny's death much better than Mettle's death. Walker's art is nice but the book was crap.
What the hell is All New gonna be about then? Past X-Men dicking around in the present? wtf
I stopped pre-ordering All New X-Men after #6 until i hear that Bendis has enough content and ideas to run two books at the same time with one double shipping. I don't believe he will, i think he will devolve into the sludge that was his Avengers duo. Hickman pulled it off with FF and Fantastic Four, but i don't trust Bendis like i do Hickman. I don't think pulling half the story content out of All New X-Men to fit into a new book is going to be the benefit of either one.
Ummmm..... okay where to begin?
Mettle was shellshocked with one person dying. Yet he did I only care about you dying. That is nothing like Mettle. Also did not at show Mettle's humor during the battle scene and just wrote him as a Thing clone. I hardly could recognize him. Hazmat's beginning inner monologue made no sense considering she grew up miss popular till her power hit and then became a freak who didn't even fit in with the freaks which turned her cynical and harsh. She was never described as a hater and in Academy was shown to have grown out of the cynical stage, maybe still blunt and brash. I think a villain can be made into a legit threat without changing everything about there look and personality. Didn't show Arcade at all conversing with buyers or making his typical puns. Other comedic villains kept the comedy routine but established as threats such as Joker. The first issue he had to impress the naysayers which Hopeless did not and instead gave us all the ammo of what we said the book was going to be. And why did he not have Arcade mention the relationship he had with Academy or the fact the Academy kids already had a run in with Arcade? So much history and character left wrong. Just makes me shake my head.
Edit: That Emma cover bothers me so much. I generally really like Bachalo's style, but I just can't see how her spine can support her legs being in that position unless she snapped one of them off and is holding it in position with that hand.
i'm sitting on the fence of Avengers Arena to get a better view of the reactions. I am going to eat some dinner soon and need to gather salt.
Yeah, I hate it when people make comments I disagree with as well - luckily I find being brusque and dismissive a great way to deal with their audacityYep, I'm not going to miss this whining horse shit.
*imagines a "Deadpool kills the FF" by Daniel Way, in continuity*
I am not trying to convince anyone. You were the one who came in here all huff and huff about people not liking the Arena. I did not feel like the character present was Arcade. Arcade is constantly shown being about the money he makes and uses murder world to demonstrate his ability to create deathtraps to protect lairs. And not being able to demonstrate the personality of a character in what is going to be his death appearance for issue makes the death meaningless. Mettle sounded nothing like the Mettle that was described in the previous issues. Mettle had how many lines in the book? And how many did Hazmat have? Where Hazmat was shown to not be a hater but have a perfect life before her accident? And he could not even inject personality into any of his own created character's line? Which OTHER writers did with just as much lines? Really? In two lines of a new character introduction, you should understand there personality and get a grasp on who they are.
Arcade was known for his sick humor which was not shown at all in the entire amount of lines he obtained. Honestly, sounds like you are just ignoring the facts shown. And read the book again, Hopeless had it where Mettle, Reptil and Hazmat didn't recognize Arcade and vice versa. Hazmat or Mettle or Reptil should of had some kind of statement referring to the past run in which incited a little rage from Arcade since they embarrassed him. The fact you are downplaying that fact makes me scratch my head a little.
I am just stating what happened in the book. You are the one trying his hardest to persuade others.
I don't think i could give Avengers Arena a fair look, it seems too shameless to me and i'd be blinded to the quality. Maybe if they didn't wholesale it as a Hunger Games/Battle Royale thing with the variants it would be easier to check out, but as it stands it would be like watching the FF fight to the death because they didn't want to bother doing anything with them after Hickman left. *imagines a "Deadpool kills the FF" by Daniel Way, in continuity*
I didn't see you comment on Action this month, how was it?
Why does Magneto have a pouch in that picture and not in this one?
regardless, he reminds me of the guy from mace the dark age now:
Read the book again. Please. You missed out on several lines from Hazmat/Mettle that address one of the issues since they mention one of his feats but not the one where he captures them. You want people to give a book a chance for no reason. I am giving UA a chance cause of Remender. The first issue does not inspire greatness. The panels, and interviews pointed towards the kind of book this was developing into. All of us naysayers about the book was going off of what interviews and solicits said.
Nah, lets go by unlimited optimism instead of logical deduction. I found none of Arcades lines the funny in a twisted sense at all but just blatant statements. I thought UXF, and Venom were going to be good due to how Remender described his ideas for the books in interviews. Same for Hopeless.
Dude I gave Fraction and Bendis additional chances. And love Fraction's Hawkeye but haven't read ANXM but will give it a shot.
I am one of the most objective "haters" as you say out there.
I'm #teamarcade as well. X-23 can die a thousand deaths.
It blew my mind.
It still doesn't top the krypto issue. That one was some All-Star level greatness.
The philosophical problem I have with Avengers Academy is that a book in which teens murder one another is bleak as fuck, when the last fucking thing we need in mainstream teenage super-hero comics is more bleak as fuck teenage death and despair. It doesn't really matter how well it's done, the problem is that it only exists to stroke an editor's murder-boner.