thehypocrite
Member
Dang.. why do we buy consoles... and how dare corporations hoodwink us into buying inferior hardware?!?
Exclusive software.
Dang.. why do we buy consoles... and how dare corporations hoodwink us into buying inferior hardware?!?
If anything this is great advertising for the PS4. Get similar quality versions of this list, in a better package, with a better design, better materials, better cooling, closed platform, much cheaper and with far greater gaming performance (as a result of better engineering and closed platform). Speaking purely from a gaming perspective.
Radeon 7950 $279
Intel i5 3470 processor $150
Gigabyte 1155 motherboard $39
Samsung DDR3 4GB RAM $22
Antec Basiq 450w power supply $39
MSI Case $20
320gb WD Caviar BlueHarddrive $45
Total: $595
And that is not shopping around and going with what I could find in 10 of browsing and with all very good, reliable parts. There is room for skimping.
Dang.. why do we buy consoles... and how dare corporations hoodwink us into buying inferior hardware?!?
Who wants to take a bet that Sony will still include fucking composite cables in the box?
I doubt that honestly. It would probably land you somewhere between PS3 and PS4 performance wise. Game console specs and PC specs do not mean the same thing.
What would a PC with 512MB RAM do for you with current gen games?
Who wants to take a bet that Sony will still include fucking composite cables in the box?
I'll take that bet. No way in hell there's not an HDMI cable included.Who wants to take a bet that Sony will still include fucking composite cables in the box?
I'll take that bet. No way in hell there's not an HDMI cable included.
Dang.. why do we buy consoles... and how dare corporations hoodwink us into buying inferior hardware?!?
Plus controller(s), plus HDMI cable, plus Windows etc.
A lot of people still have SD tvs. I think they might have to include both.
Good luck on your plan. I really doubt this system of yours will run next gen games as well as you think.I mean, I guess we'll see but if this hardware is what it is rumored to be around, not really. Maybe you'll gain a bit in the magical "optimization" but since these systems seem to be using off the shelf PC parts not really. And the intel processors run circles around AMDs. MS and Sony are going with AMD because they are cheaper and they use less power.
If anything this is great advertising for the PS4. Get similar quality versions of this list, in a better package, with a better design, better materials, better cooling, closed platform, much cheaper and with far greater gaming performance (as a result of better engineering and closed platform). Speaking purely from a gaming perspective.
Isn't it funny that the package is 600 and better then the rumoured specs but if Sony and MS were to buy those parts it would be much cheaper due to large orders and contracts, and yet we still get rumours of inferior hardware...
Playing PS4.. no not 3, PS4 on a SDTV. Does not compute.
Playing PS4.. no not 3, PS4 on a SDTV. Does not compute.
A lot of people still have SD tvs. I think they might have to include both.
See you can do the same thing with consoles. Plus one year of Xbox Live/Playstation Plus. Plus batter packs/charge kits for controller, plus HDMI, plus microphone/blutooth headset etc.
I'm just talking about the basics here.
Eh I think there will only be HDMI in the box (althought those cheap cables that came with PS3 probably cost Sony 50 cents so who knows). I cant imagine there are many people who will be buying a PS4 that dont own a TV at least capable of 720p.A lot of people still have SD tvs. I think they might have to include both.
See you can do the same thing with consoles. Plus one year of Xbox Live/Playstation Plus. Plus batter packs/charge kits for controller, plus HDMI, plus microphone/blutooth headset etc.
I'm just talking about the basics here.
Good luck on your plan. I really doubt this system of yours will run next gen games as well as you think.
So they aren't going to support 480p?
They have to. I think atleast PS4 they have to.
PS5 I think they could finally drop it.
To be fair, a lot of what you are paying for is that tiny little customized box and the fact that it can't draw as much power/produce as much heat.
It takes a lot to put mid-tier parts in a small little box that only draws 300 watts of power. That is a lot of what you are paying for.
Not the same. The console ones you've listed are optional. The ones I've listed are mandatory for playing games on your gaming PC.
Do you have any idea about the current performance gaps between AMD and Intel processors?
AMD holds their own in graphics but with inferior driver support--which is why I buy AMD graphics cards since they have more bang for the buck and I'm willing to deal with a few minor driver problems now and then--but they are pretty far behind Intel in processors.
I really wish people who keep adding up PC components in these threads would read this, and stop adding up components. In a Sony console thread of all places, (meaning that it's a publisher who doesn't publish almost anything on PC).Yes, because that will let me play all my favourite games. You know, like games from Japan and console exclusives, which make up a good 75%+ of my gaming.
I couldn't give a shit if a mid to high end PC can make games like Far Cry 3 or Skyrim look an order or magnitude better than the PS3, as I rarely play those sort of games. If it let me play Vanquish etc in 1080p/60, then you might make me sit up and take note.
Steam has its place, but the idea that it makes consoles irrelevant is just as laughable now as it's always been. If / when Steam has the same selection of games I can enjoy on my consoles, and not just predominantly western multi platform games, then you'll have a point.
Well to be fair, if Gabe Newell has his way, you won't pretty shortly. And with PS4 rummored to Linux based, throwing a free copy of Unbuntu on there seems like it could become a real viable option in the near future.
But regardless, is there anybody who doesn't have a copy of Windows lying around on some machine that they could just grab the key from at this point?
Does anyone live in a house where no keyboards or mice exists? I mean, I guess that is possible but I doubt it.
But fine. Logitech Mouse and Keyboard: $15. Done.
Intel is still way ahead, even with their more modest chips.
However, to make matters worse, a Jaguar core is the kind you'd put in a tablet/netbook etc. It's designed for OK IPC at low frequencies to save on power. It's not a desktop-class part even for AMD's unfortunately lower standards, it is certainly quite a bit weaker. But, that's why the rumour in the OP said 8 of them.
I am not talking about dropping support but packing composite in lieu of HDMI for PS4 is just absurd.
Not really.
ALL tv's have composite.
NOT all tv's have HDMI.
Not really.
ALL tv's have composite.
NOT all tv's have HDMI.
You are right but I'm giving AMD a little benefit of the doubt since we dont know what this new generation of mobile chips can do.
Does anyone live in a house where no keyboards or mice exists? I mean, I guess that is possible but I doubt it.
But fine. Logitech Mouse and Keyboard: $15. Done.
Plus blu ray player?
benchmarks don't matter since they aren't games. As far as I know a PC with 2x the processing power as the xbox has a hard time even running bad ports like metro 2033 which was made for consoles. Maybe you don't remember all the bad ports like GTA4 on PC...You are right but I'm giving AMD a little benefit of the doubt since we dont know what this new generation of mobile chips can do.
But even if we given them the benefit of doubt that they can magically get it up to speed with their best desktop chips, an i5 is still going to run circles around it as benchmark after benchmark has demonstrated but for some reason some people in this thread seem not to believe that.
Do composite cables carry HD signal?
Is PS4 designed with HD gaming in mind?
Why can't they just pack both?
Do composite cables carry HD signal?
Is PS4 designed with HD gaming in mind?
Why can't they just pack both?
benchmarks don't matter since they aren't games. As far as I know a PC with 2x the processing power as the xbox has a hard time even running bad ports like metro 2033 which was made for consoles. Maybe you don't remember all the bad ports like GTA4 on PC...
Why would you need to buy an extra dual shock or 360 controller? Anybody who owns a current gen system has one of those.
And Win 8 can regularly be found for around $60-$70 and again that is assuming no PC or laptop/netboom exists in your house that doesnt already have a serial key you could use.
Why would you need to buy an extra dual shock or 360 controller? Anybody who owns a current gen system has one of those.
You are emulating a console that has 1/10th the processing power of your PC, I hope it runs "fine". Now imaging doing that in 2006. If you want, list the 2006 prices and specs.I have a $500 media PC machine I built last year that runs Metro fine. You can't crank everything to max settings, but that console version doesnt even have those settings to begin with. I played ALOT of Skyrim on that PC with the HD texture pack at high settings and it ran great.
Sure, every now and then you get a badly optimized port like Saints Row 2. But that is no different on consoles. See Skyrim on PS3, etc.
I have a $500 media PC machine I built last year that runs Metro fine. You can't crank everything to max settings, but that console version doesnt even have those settings to begin with. I played ALOT of Skyrim on that PC with the HD texture pack at high settings and it ran great.
Sure, every now and then you get a badly optimized port like Saints Row 2. But that is no different on consoles. See Skyrim on PS3, etc.