[Eurogamer\DF] Orbis Unmasked: what to expect from the next-gen PlayStation.

If anything this is great advertising for the PS4. Get similar quality versions of this list, in a better package, with a better design, better materials, better cooling, closed platform, much cheaper and with far greater gaming performance (as a result of better engineering and closed platform). Speaking purely from a gaming perspective.

Not really. That I5 runs circles around the AMD processors. And the 7950 is also more powerful than the mobile version by a considerable amount. If you wanted something about the equivalent of these specs, you could easily throw a current 8 core AMD processor in there and a 7850 and be about $100 cheaper.
 
I doubt that honestly. It would probably land you somewhere between PS3 and PS4 performance wise. Game console specs and PC specs do not mean the same thing.

What would a PC with 512MB RAM do for you with current gen games?

I mean, I guess we'll see but if this hardware is what it is rumored to be around, not really. Maybe you'll gain a bit in the magical "optimization" but since these systems seem to be using off the shelf PC parts not really. And the intel processors run circles around AMDs. MS and Sony are going with AMD because they are cheaper and they use less power.
 
Dang.. why do we buy consoles... and how dare corporations hoodwink us into buying inferior hardware?!?

Isn't it funny that the package is 600 and better then the rumoured specs but if Sony and MS were to buy those parts it would be much cheaper due to large orders and contracts, and yet we still get rumours of inferior hardware...
 
Plus controller(s), plus HDMI cable, plus Windows etc.

See you can do the same thing with consoles. Plus one year of Xbox Live/Playstation Plus. Plus batter packs/charge kits for controller, plus HDMI, plus microphone/blutooth headset etc.

I'm just talking about the basics here.
 
I mean, I guess we'll see but if this hardware is what it is rumored to be around, not really. Maybe you'll gain a bit in the magical "optimization" but since these systems seem to be using off the shelf PC parts not really. And the intel processors run circles around AMDs. MS and Sony are going with AMD because they are cheaper and they use less power.
Good luck on your plan. I really doubt this system of yours will run next gen games as well as you think.
 
If anything this is great advertising for the PS4. Get similar quality versions of this list, in a better package, with a better design, better materials, better cooling, closed platform, much cheaper and with far greater gaming performance (as a result of better engineering and closed platform). Speaking purely from a gaming perspective.


I wouldn't compare a 7950 with a 7850, personally. There's a noticeable price difference, for a reason. Not to mention the i5 processor...dammit.


Beaten :(
 
Isn't it funny that the package is 600 and better then the rumoured specs but if Sony and MS were to buy those parts it would be much cheaper due to large orders and contracts, and yet we still get rumours of inferior hardware...

To be fair, a lot of what you are paying for is that tiny little customized box and the fact that it can't draw as much power/produce as much heat.

It takes a lot to put mid-tier parts in a small little box that only draws 300 watts of power. That is a lot of what you are paying for.
 
See you can do the same thing with consoles. Plus one year of Xbox Live/Playstation Plus. Plus batter packs/charge kits for controller, plus HDMI, plus microphone/blutooth headset etc.

I'm just talking about the basics here.

Lol Playstation Plus should not be in there. It's not a pay to play online thing. It's essentially a monthly charge for a slew of monthly games.

Battery pack, charger etc is included with the console, as is the controller and I'd imagine hdmi cable. So these are pretty naff points.

I reckon with the PS4 the headset will be the only thing you'd need to buy.
 
A lot of people still have SD tvs. I think they might have to include both.
Eh I think there will only be HDMI in the box (althought those cheap cables that came with PS3 probably cost Sony 50 cents so who knows). I cant imagine there are many people who will be buying a PS4 that dont own a TV at least capable of 720p.
 
See you can do the same thing with consoles. Plus one year of Xbox Live/Playstation Plus. Plus batter packs/charge kits for controller, plus HDMI, plus microphone/blutooth headset etc.

I'm just talking about the basics here.

Not the same. The console ones you've listed are optional. The ones I've listed are mandatory for playing games on your gaming PC.
 
Good luck on your plan. I really doubt this system of yours will run next gen games as well as you think.

Do you have any idea about the current performance gaps between AMD and Intel processors?

AMD holds their own in graphics but with inferior driver support--which is why I buy AMD graphics cards since they have more bang for the buck and I'm willing to deal with a few minor driver problems now and then--but they are pretty far behind Intel in processors.
 
To be fair, a lot of what you are paying for is that tiny little customized box and the fact that it can't draw as much power/produce as much heat.

It takes a lot to put mid-tier parts in a small little box that only draws 300 watts of power. That is a lot of what you are paying for.

Yes, I've put that into consideration, but even bkillian said they can put more power if they really wanted to, it's just that they're using what they think is enough for whatever their objective is for the consoles. It's possible this time casual audience will be more of a focus while having just enough grunt to keep the core audience interested. There is still the 8xxx series coming up which should offer more power efficiencies.
 
Do you have any idea about the current performance gaps between AMD and Intel processors?

AMD holds their own in graphics but with inferior driver support--which is why I buy AMD graphics cards since they have more bang for the buck and I'm willing to deal with a few minor driver problems now and then--but they are pretty far behind Intel in processors.

Intel is still way ahead, even with their more modest chips.

However, to make matters worse, a Jaguar core is the kind you'd put in a tablet/netbook etc. It's designed for OK IPC at low frequencies to save on power. It's not a desktop-class part even for AMD's unfortunately lower standards, it is certainly quite a bit weaker. But, that's why the rumour in the OP said 8 of them.
 
Yes, because that will let me play all my favourite games. You know, like games from Japan and console exclusives, which make up a good 75%+ of my gaming.

I couldn't give a shit if a mid to high end PC can make games like Far Cry 3 or Skyrim look an order or magnitude better than the PS3, as I rarely play those sort of games. If it let me play Vanquish etc in 1080p/60, then you might make me sit up and take note.

Steam has its place, but the idea that it makes consoles irrelevant is just as laughable now as it's always been. If / when Steam has the same selection of games I can enjoy on my consoles, and not just predominantly western multi platform games, then you'll have a point.
I really wish people who keep adding up PC components in these threads would read this, and stop adding up components. In a Sony console thread of all places, (meaning that it's a publisher who doesn't publish almost anything on PC).
 
Well to be fair, if Gabe Newell has his way, you won't pretty shortly. And with PS4 rummored to Linux based, throwing a free copy of Unbuntu on there seems like it could become a real viable option in the near future.

But regardless, is there anybody who doesn't have a copy of Windows lying around on some machine that they could just grab the key from at this point?

Try finding linux drivers for half of those things. You'd be in a world of crap. Of course the Piston will be fully supported, but it doesn't make everything else you buy covered.
 
Intel is still way ahead, even with their more modest chips.

However, to make matters worse, a Jaguar core is the kind you'd put in a tablet/netbook etc. It's designed for OK IPC at low frequencies to save on power. It's not a desktop-class part even for AMD's unfortunately lower standards, it is certainly quite a bit weaker. But, that's why the rumour in the OP said 8 of them.

You are right but I'm giving AMD a little benefit of the doubt since we dont know what this new generation of mobile chips can do.

But even if we given them the benefit of doubt that they can magically get it up to speed with their best desktop chips, an i5 is still going to run circles around it as benchmark after benchmark has demonstrated but for some reason some people in this thread seem not to believe that.
 
You are right but I'm giving AMD a little benefit of the doubt since we dont know what this new generation of mobile chips can do.

But even if we given them the benefit of doubt that they can magically get it up to speed with their best desktop chips, an i5 is still going to run circles around it as benchmark after benchmark has demonstrated but for some reason some people in this thread seem not to believe that.
benchmarks don't matter since they aren't games. As far as I know a PC with 2x the processing power as the xbox has a hard time even running bad ports like metro 2033 which was made for consoles. Maybe you don't remember all the bad ports like GTA4 on PC...
 
Do composite cables carry HD signal?

Is PS4 designed with HD gaming in mind?

Why can't they just pack both?

PS3 was designed to be an HD console and they didn't even bother with component, just composite.

Sony figures they don't want parents having little Timmy open up his Christmas present and whoops! No composite cable. Only HDMI. Well shit. Timmy is fucked.

Plus composite is probably cheaper to make, and they know the hardcore will buy the hdmi cables anyways. Honestly, it wouldn't surprise me. They have to accommodate the lowest common denominator.
 
Dualshock 3 - $44.99
Windows 8 OEM - $99.99
HDMI cable - ~$5

The price is now around $750.

Why would you need to buy an extra dual shock or 360 controller? Anybody who owns a current gen system has one of those.

And Win 8 can regularly be found for around $60-$70 and again that is assuming no PC or laptop/netboom exists in your house that doesnt already have a serial key you could use.

Anyway, I made my point. For between $559-$600 you can build a PC that blows these rumored specs away. If you want to take off $69 for a copy of Windows you could easily throw a $60 cheaper graphics card in there.

The 7950 is one of the top tier graphics cards on the market. These specs probably wont beat a 7850 which is even $90 cheaper.

You can nickel and time all you want. I was demonstrating an accurate ballpark with off the shelf parts not even waiting for good sales.
 
God, the new experia tablet is sexy as fuck. Along with Experia Z, Sony seem to have turned a corner in terms of design.
 
benchmarks don't matter since they aren't games. As far as I know a PC with 2x the processing power as the xbox has a hard time even running bad ports like metro 2033 which was made for consoles. Maybe you don't remember all the bad ports like GTA4 on PC...

I have a $500 media PC machine I built last year that runs Metro fine. You can't crank everything to max settings, but that console version doesnt even have those settings to begin with. I played ALOT of Skyrim on that PC with the HD texture pack at high settings and it ran great.

Sure, every now and then you get a badly optimized port like Saints Row 2. But that is no different on consoles. See Skyrim on PS3, etc.
 
Why would you need to buy an extra dual shock or 360 controller? Anybody who owns a current gen system has one of those.

And Win 8 can regularly be found for around $60-$70 and again that is assuming no PC or laptop/netboom exists in your house that doesnt already have a serial key you could use.

Stop.
 
Why would you need to buy an extra dual shock or 360 controller? Anybody who owns a current gen system has one of those.

Seriously? Because you were trying to claim that rather than buying a PS4, you should make your own HDTV connected gaming PC for $550 that would run rings around it. So, you know, you'd need all the bits that would make this possible.

If you're cherry picking what components to ignore, why not just assume that everyone has a spare i5 CPU laying around. I mean, I have one sat on my desk at work. Doesn't everyone?
 
I have a $500 media PC machine I built last year that runs Metro fine. You can't crank everything to max settings, but that console version doesnt even have those settings to begin with. I played ALOT of Skyrim on that PC with the HD texture pack at high settings and it ran great.

Sure, every now and then you get a badly optimized port like Saints Row 2. But that is no different on consoles. See Skyrim on PS3, etc.
You are emulating a console that has 1/10th the processing power of your PC, I hope it runs "fine". Now imaging doing that in 2006. If you want, list the 2006 prices and specs.
 
I have a $500 media PC machine I built last year that runs Metro fine. You can't crank everything to max settings, but that console version doesnt even have those settings to begin with. I played ALOT of Skyrim on that PC with the HD texture pack at high settings and it ran great.

Sure, every now and then you get a badly optimized port like Saints Row 2. But that is no different on consoles. See Skyrim on PS3, etc.

Your brand new media pc plays one game better than a console with nearly decade year old hardware. Congratulations.

On a side note, play the 360 version.
 
I'm not saying PC gaming doesn't have its place, it has a huge one and for a lot of people it's the place to be. It's just getting annoying seeing people act like consoles are nothing but overpriced gaming PCs.
 
Top Bottom