SolidSnakesMyStepDad
Member
ummm... Did he just say $899
I'm cringing over some of the replies here, "wat r u gonna do wit it!!1" - I swear, some people live in a 1920x1080 - 2xMSAA - 35FPS bubble.
Rough Comparison:
I'm cringing over some of the replies here, "wat r u gonna do wit it!!1" - I swear, some people live in a 1920x1080 - Medium / High settings - 2xMSAA - 35FPS bubble.
I'm cringing over some of the replies here, "wat r u gonna do wit it!!1" - I swear, some people live in a 1920x1080 - Medium / High settings - 2xMSAA - 35FPS bubble.
I must get this because I want better specs than everyone on the internet!
For rich people who upgrade to top of the line parts yearly or so I guess.
I wonder if there will be a medium end model of this series by late March which is when I'll build a new rig.
Or if it will at least affect the prices of the older models in any significant way to get a currently high end card.
Is this chart accurate? Sub-60 fps for 7870s at not even 1080p? My rig needs more Gandalf jizz.
And this looks brutal. AMD is getting slaughtered again, isn't it? I can't support Nvidia, though, even besides their insane pricing.
I just want to run every game at 60fps on max settings at 1080p. Will this finally do it?
Far Cry 3 is pretty demanding at Very High settings.
The medium end models are technically the 670/680...
I'm cringing over some of the replies here, "wat r u gonna do wit it!!1" - I swear, some people live in a 1920x1080 - 2xMSAA - 35FPS bubble.
It's times like these that I wish I was rich.
Why buy a ferrari now when you can buy the better one coming out in 5 years? Because I want a ferrari now dammit! You'd never buy a new GPU if you constantly operated on that line of thinking.
Freaking graphics whores every single one of you.
Please tell me what possible use this could have in gaming in the next say 5 years? Much less 2 of them?
Awesome a 900 dollar piece of hardware that has no real purpose...
Oh yea you can go from 60 fps to 65 fps ooo wow. Maybe a tiny bit more detailed shadows. You guys have become caricatures of yourselves. It's sad.
Resolution doesn't mean everything to everyone. When I was younger I always ran higher resolutions(well high at the time, 1024x768, 1280x1024, 1600x1200 etc..), but I don't find it really adds much anymore, and would rather just buy a cheaper GPU.
A guy running a $200 GPU at 1080p and lower AA settings isn't really going to have a much different experience then a guy running a much higher res with much higher AA settings and a $500 part.
$900 for a GPU is major nerd territory and it's hard to comprehend spending that much for most unless you're into Rendering and shit.
15 years ago this stuff was exciting, but I find it all rather boring now and I would imagine a lot of people feel the same which is why you get some of those types of replies. Or ignorance.
I think the difference is night and day, that one GAF dude's Tera Online screenshots make it look like a whole other game even though I could run the game comfortably in high res and settings, but without super-sampling it to hell and back like he does. It makes games look like CG quality. Of course I can settle for waaaaaaaaaay less and I don't plan to have a PC that does that shit with Crysis 3 and future games but you won't catch me saying it doesn't make a difference...A guy running a $200 GPU at 1080p and lower AA settings isn't really going to have a much different experience then a guy running a much higher res with much higher AA settings and a $500 part.
Resolution doesn't mean everything to everyone. When I was younger I always ran higher resolutions(well high at the time, 1024x768, 1280x1024, 1600x1200 etc..), but I don't find it really adds much anymore, and would rather just buy a cheaper GPU.
A guy running a $200 GPU at 1080p and lower AA settings isn't really going to have a much different experience then a guy running a much higher res with much higher AA settings and a $500 part.
$900 for a GPU is major nerd territory and it's hard to comprehend spending that much for most unless you're into Rendering and shit.
15 years ago this stuff was exciting, but I find it all rather boring now and I would imagine a lot of people feel the same which is why you get some of those types of replies. Or ignorance.
Heh, you guys think that's expensive, imagine how much the professional Quadro line equivalent is going to be!
You buy this, in 5 years it will be worthless.
If you buy 2 $200 gpu(1 now and 1 in 4 years), you will be better performance by the end of the 5 years.
It's times like these that I wish I was rich.
Why buy a ferrari now when you can buy the better one coming out in 5 years? Because I want a ferrari now dammit! You'd never buy a new GPU if you constantly operated on that line of thinking.
Maybe, but for the price of one you can easily keep up with top-end GPUs for a lifetime. And then some.because ferrari don't come out with cars 50% more powerful each year.
nVidia and AMD keep pushing up those profit margins. Anyone else remember when the 4870 launched at $300? How far we've fallen.
Damn, I poked fun just at his last post but I didn't notice he was melting down so much.It's ok, it's ok... shhh shhh *cradles Metazoid gently* there there, the evil graphics whores won't ruin your fun anymore.
This is slower than a 690.
I remember buying a 4870x2 for $500 and I thought that was crazy 5 years ago.
This will push the prices of the 6xx series down, together with the new 7xx series.
It's all good.
I kinda wish I bought a second gtx480 back then, it's difficult to find one now.
It's ok, it's ok... shhh shhh *cradles Metazoid gently* there there, the evil graphics whores won't ruin your fun anymore.
Why not just drop the extra hundred and go for the 690 at that point. You HAVE to be rolling in fucking money at that point.
remember when you could buy a cola for 5c?
When is the 7xx series coming out and will they have the maxwell architecture or a upgraded Kepler architecture?