• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Iwata implies he may resign over poor business performance

I really like Iwata, really I do... he is so awesome in appearances
but if that is what Nintendo needs to survive... they should bring in new blood with a different perspective to keep them afloat in these uncertain times
 
Sucks for Iwata but if Nintendo's having trouble it's good they're willing to take drastic consequences. It's not like Sony/Microsoft where their games division can hemorrhage money and they can just be like 'oh well, we'll get em next time'. They have to make a profit. Convince me to buy a Wii U Nintendo!

I think you are underestimating the amount of money the Wii and DS made last gen.
 
Star Fox and F Zero would sell more than Pikmin....

The Gamecube editions would like a word with you. It's not going to be one game that saves Nintendo. They need a variety of games to make the Wii U worth picking up for people who aren't convinced to buy hardware with just one or two titles.
 
Star Fox and F Zero would sell more than Pikmin....

f-zero would not sell more than pikmin. both pikmin games on the gamecube outsold f-zero gx, f-zero x, f-zero max velocity, and f-zero gp legend.

star fox is more recognizable. it's also a pretty shitty series with one good game (star fox 64). it's also sold less with every installment since star fox 64.
 
Neither would a GBA 2.0



Star Fox has been on a decline

Can't comment on F-Zero though as I never looked at how it sells.

Starfox has been on a decline because Miyamoto keeps forcing stupid ideas on to the designers like all range mode, land based levels and other vehicles.

Starfox is a shooter goddammit. A star based shooter! I'm surprised Starfox 64 was so good despite his attempts to derail it.

Lets not forget that it was his idea to change Dinosaur Planet into Starfox adventures. Dude single handedly destroyed Rare as well.
 
I seriously question the business knowledge some of you recent posters have. Its pretty fucking obvious that the 20+ million people who purchased a 3ds did so off the basis of the 3d (either as a primary or secondary reason). A couple of posters on GAF don't represent the interests of the market as a whole.
in other words, those who arent fond of the 3d screen are just a vocal minority
 
f-zero would not sell more than pikmin. both pikmin games on the gamecube outsold f-zero gx.

star fox is more recognizable. it's also a pretty shitty series with one good game (star fox 64).

2 good games...the ones made by Nintendo...

It's no surprise that every time Nintendo has farmed out their IP, it has been a disaster apart from Donkey Kong.
 
Starfox has been on a decline because Miyamoto keeps forcing stupid ideas on to the designers like all range mode, land based levels and other vehicles.

Starfox is a shooter goddammit. A star based shooter! I'm surprised Starfox 64 was so good despite his attempts to derail it.

Lets not forget that it was his idea to change Dinosaur Planet into Starfox adventures. Dude single handedly destroyed Rare as well.

[citation needed]
 
The touch screen on 3DS is useless because using it as a primary game display is obviously never gonna happen. Old DS games could switch between the screens and it was fine, now you don't want to be looking away from the vastly superior top screen. The dual screens is a relic that serves no purpose. It's just another example of 3DS being a poorly thought out product.

They needed to include a seperate touch screen because fingerprints and smudges ruin the 3D effect. Iwata explained this when the 3DS was first unveiled.
 
I seriously question the business knowledge some of you recent posters have. Its pretty fucking obvious that the 20+ million people who purchased a 3ds did so off the basis of the 3d (either as a primary or secondary reason). A couple of posters on GAF don't represent the interests of the market as a whole.
in other words, those who arent fond of the 3d screen are just a vocal minority

dude...no one gives a shit about 3D! Sales only went up when the Mario games came!
 
I seriously question the business knowledge some of you recent posters have. Its pretty fucking obvious that the 20+ million people who purchased a 3ds did so off the basis of the 3d (either as a primary or secondary reason). A couple of posters on GAF don't represent the interests of the market as a whole.
in other words, those who arent fond of the 3d screen are just a vocal minority

1) You have no idea what the motivations of 20+ Million people were.

2) If if some people bought because of the 3D, it doesn't mean they still use the 3D. I think the 3D is badly implemented and I can't be the only one.
 
They needed to include a seperate touch screen because finger prints and smudges ruin the 3D effect. Iwata explained this when the 3DS was first unveiled.

But there's no point in a touch screen when it's always going to be on a secondary screen. With the DS the second screen could have the gameplay on it so you had cool stuff like Yoshi Touch and Go and the first Kirby and Ouendan. Now it's just something that's there because they didn't come up with anything better.
 
2 good games...the ones made by Nintendo...

It's no surprise that every time Nintendo has farmed out their IP, it has been a disaster apart from Donkey Kong.

monster's excite games were pretty badass. they could probably make an f-zero that's fun to play (that concept might anger fans of the series, but having a fun racing game isn't a bad thing).

next-level seems to know their stuff too.
 
You are absolutely free to have an opinion. But according to sales figures, this is not the case.
can you post them? googles not giving me a straight answer.
Wikipedia says Pikmin outsold Starfox : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-selling_Nintendo_GameCube_video_games
But there's no point in a touch screen when it's always going to be on a secondary screen. With the DS the second screen could have the gameplay on it so you had cool stuff like Yoshi Touch and Go and the first Kirby and Ouendan. Now it's just something that's there because they didn't come up with anything better.

There is no rule indicating the second screen is useless if it is not used as a primary screen for some games.
 
I seriously question the business knowledge some of you recent posters have. Its pretty fucking obvious that the 20+ million people who purchased a 3ds did so off the basis of the 3d (either as a primary or secondary reason). A couple of posters on GAF don't represent the interests of the market as a whole.
in other words, those who arent fond of the 3d screen are just a vocal minority

And basis for your proclamation is... ?
 
You are absolutely free to have an opinion. But according to sales figures, this is not the case.

in the us:

f-zero x: 390k
f-zero gx: 360k
f-zero mv: 280k
f-zero gpl: lower than that

pikmin: 680k
pikmin 2: 400k

star fox adventures: 830k
star fox assault: 500k
star fox command: 320k

in japan:

f-zero x: 100k
f-zero gx: 100k
f-zero mv: 330k
f-zero gpl: 9k
f-zero climax: 5k

pikmin: 500k
pikmin 2: 480k

star fox adventures: 260k
star fox assault: 195k
star fox command: 94k

pikmin 1 is a bigger game than the gamecube f-zero. it's also a bigger game than the first gamecube star fox. pikmin 2 is a bigger game than the gamecube f-zero, as well as the second gamecube star fox.
 
You can't be credible with your claims then if you can't back them up :P

dude...it's well publicised that Miyamoto and his clique which includes Iwata absolutely detested Rare cos they were like tech wizards and every one loved them. Miyamoto was livid when he was told that Yoshis Island was shit compared to DKC...understandably cos YI is fucking awesome and DKC is dogshit.

Miyamoto never forgot and when he saw Dino Planet he decided to Cena the game and Rare as well because he knew he was over the hill and Mario Sunshine was going to be shit (which it was) and he couldnt afford to be shown up by Rare so he insisted they turn it into Starfox adventures. The rest history and Rare now make shovelware....ironically just like Miyamoto!
 
monster's excite games were pretty badass. they could probably make an f-zero that's fun to play (that concept might anger fans of the series, but having a fun racing game isn't a bad thing).

next-level seems to know their stuff too.

I think the last thing Nintendo needs to do is farm out their IP again. They need to rebuild their brands after a decade of abuse.
 
We don't need outdated space furries after there has been the superior Kid Icarus and Sin & Punishment 2 anymore. Starfox really is one of the worst Nintendo series, it's worthless outside of nostalgia at this point.

Nintendo should replace Iwata with a westerner who knows what the Internet is if they intend to keep competing with Microsoft and Apple.

Pretty sure Iwata knows what the internet is and used it wisely to make people aware of Animal Crossing in Japan with its Direct and then made it a megaseller. What Nintendo really needs is a new marketing team in America. US is dragging them down, Reggie can't even make it clear to people that the 3DS is a new generation device after 2 years almost.
 
dude...it's well publicised that Miyamoto and his clique which includes Iwata absolutely detested Rare cos they were like tech wizards and every one loved them. Miyamoto was livid when he was told that Yoshis Island was shit compared to DKC...understandably cos YI is fucking awesome and DKC is dogshit.

Miyamoto never forgot and when he saw Dino Planet he decided to Cena the game and Rare as well because he knew he was over the hill and Mario Sunshine was going to be shit (which it was) and he couldnt afford to be shown up by Rare so he insisted they turn it into Starfox adventures. The rest history and Rare now make shovelware....ironically just like Miyamoto!

Nintendo History, as told Brera
's horribly skewed perspective

I mean, Jesus Christ dude. I think Miyamoto's been more miss than hit lately, but there's telling the facts and then there's twisting them to suit a narrative.
 
dude...it's well publicised that Miyamoto and his clique which includes Iwata absolutely detested Rare cos they were like tech wizards and every one loved them. Miyamoto was livid when he was told that Yoshis Island was shit compared to DKC...understandably cos YI is fucking awesome and DKC is dogshit.

Miyamoto never forgot and when he saw Dino Planet he decided to Cena the game and Rare as well because he knew he was over the hill and Mario Sunshine was going to be shit (which it was) and he couldnt afford to be shown up by Rare so he insisted they turn it into Starfox adventures. The rest history and Rare now make shovelware....ironically just like Miyamoto!

I'm sure you still believe he made Yoshi island because of the DKC graphics amirite?
 
There is no rule indicating the second screen is useless if it is not used as a primary screen for some games.

I haven't played a single 3DS game that's had meaningful touch screen usage. And I'm sure somebody can name one, but the fact is it's far, far less of a priority for devs now than the DS' touch screen was. If the second screen was gone from the 3DS few people would miss it.

E: I guess Kid Icarus, but given how awful that game is because there's no second stick I wouldn't use that as a reason to praise a touch screen.
 
And basis for your proclamation is... ?

Like a said in my previous post, why would someone buy a product if most if not all aspects of the product appealed to them? Take 3dtvs for example; most of the people who buy them most likely do because one bulletpoint the tv covers is 3d. It doesn't have to be the consumers primary factor for purchase but just one of many reasons. Else the consumer would look for another product which doesn't have a feature they don't care about or wouldn't use. Its pretty logical consumerism.
 
in the us:

f-zero x: 390k
f-zero gx: 360k
f-zero mv: 280k
f-zero gpl: lower than that

pikmin: 680k
pikmin 2: 400k

in japan:

f-zero x: 100k
f-zero gx: 100k
f-zero mv: 330k
f-zero gpl: 9k
f-zero climax: 5k

pikmin: 500k
pikmin 2: 480k

But what happened to the comparison with the star fox series?

I am on ipad, so I am not tempted to surf around & copy/pasting. :)
 
But what happened to the comparison with the star fox series?

I am on ipad, so I am not tempted to surf around & copy/pasting. :)

updated with the star fox numbers. people only think star fox is a big deal because it once was about 20-15 years ago.

f-zero was a launch game for the snes and that's where any of its mainstream popularity ends.
 
There are people here bad mouthing Fzero and Starfox (as one of the worst Nintendo franchises) and proclaiming Pikmin and Kid Icarus....KID ICARUS with it's shitty controls as something better!

Guys...you do understand there have only been 2 Starfox games? On the SNES and N64?
 
I haven't played a single 3DS game that's had meaningful touch screen usage. And I'm sure somebody can name one, but the fact is it's far, far less of a priority for devs now than the DS' touch screen was. If the second screen was gone from the 3DS few people would miss it.
You could say the same thing about nearly anything on a system. Shoulder buttons are not a priority either, not every game uses them.
 
Not to attempt to agree with Brera, however I think Nintendo software woes are more a result of Miyamoto meddling with all teams to push his perspective for games and Iwata giving him to much free reign.
 
Like a said in my previous post, why would someone buy a product if most if not all aspects of the product appealed to them? Take 3dtvs for example; most of the people who buy them most likely do because one bulletpoint the tv covers is 3d. It doesn't have to be the consumers primary factor for purchase but just one of many reasons. Else the consumer would look for another product which doesn't have a feature they don't care about or wouldn't use. Its pretty logical consumerism.

...

This is so logically flawed I don't know if I have the time to dissect it.

People might buy 3D TVs because alternatives are being phased out and they are becoming the only options for those purchasing a new TV.

Similarly, somebody (or somebody's parent) can buy a 3DS because the other systems are being phased out and they are becoming the only options for new games and Nintendo titles.

You're not even making an argument anyway; you've moved the goalposts to "3D can be a factor." Well, yeah, it could, but that doesn't mean it's even close to being a motivating factor for anyone, nor is it even clearly evident that is for a majority of people.
 
No one was buying the 3DS either before Nintendo put some effort in.

Sony has not release much at all for it or pushed it since it's launch. I'm guessing they are waiting for a tied relaunch with the PS4 this year. Holding back content before blowing their load. Have you seen Killzone on Vita??

Hope I don't come across all Anti-Nintendo. I consider myself a Nintendo fanboy!

Killzone vita is going to do as much as resistance or call of duty on vita
 
Pretty sure Iwata knows what the internet is and used it wisely to make people aware of Animal Crossing in Japan with its Direct and then made it a megaseller. What Nintendo really needs is a new marketing team in America. US is dragging them down, Reggie can't even make it clear to people that the 3DS is a new generation device after 2 years almost.

He may know the Internet exists and can transmit propaganda, but his inability to use it in a useful way for video games and even attempt to feature match Sony and Microsoft is embarrassing. Gimmicks like Miiverse don't make up for the ineptitude in regards to Nintendo's online for playing games.
 
pikmin is batting 1.000. star fox is what, 0.200? and f-zero is 0.000 of course, because racing is one of gaming's worst genres.
 
There are people here bad mouthing Fzero and Starfox (as one of the worst Nintendo franchises) and proclaiming Pikmin and Kid Icarus....KID ICARUS with it's shitty controls as something better!

Guys...you do understand there have only been 2 Starfox games? On the SNES and N64?

I'm sure if you played the games for more than 5 minutes you might appreciate why people love Pikmin and Kid Icarus uprising.

Also from the sounds of things Starfox might get a new game Brera, because the 3DS remake sold well enough. Kinda ironic since, you know, hate the 3DS.
 
updated with the star fox numbers. people only think star fox is a big deal because it once was about 20-15 years ago.

f-zero was a launch game for the snes and that's where any of its mainstream popularity ends.

SNES Starfox sold 3 million.

N64 Starfox sold 4 million....
 
I haven't played a single 3DS game that's had meaningful touch screen usage. And I'm sure somebody can name one, but the fact is it's far, far less of a priority for devs now than the DS' touch screen was. If the second screen was gone from the 3DS few people would miss it.

E: I guess Kid Icarus, but given how awful that game is because there's no second stick I wouldn't use that as a reason to praise a touch screen.

Well what do you define as meaningful? I think visual novels use the touch screen well.

I personally prefer the touchscreen to be used as a secondary screen. Much more useful that way.
 
Top Bottom