I will now watch this show under the assumption that both it and Saved By The Bell exist in the same universe.
How else to explain the mysterious time stopping powers of the main characters?
The show actually exists within the Troll 2 universe.
I will now watch this show under the assumption that both it and Saved By The Bell exist in the same universe.
How else to explain the mysterious time stopping powers of the main characters?
The show actually exists within the Troll 2 universe.
Yeah that's really annoying.yeah I hate these.. they always contain inadvertent spoilers
well, not spoilers exactly but you're waiting to see how specific past events come back around
On episode 7 now.
I really hope Spacey and his wife get screwed. Such assholes.
The tv interviewThe show is really interesting. Just when Spacey does something i like they manage to pull off some seriously low shit and then win the battle.
The tv interviewHe's a piece of shit.where he messes up was brilliant. Felt good. The meeting following made me hate him so much.
He's a fantastic character. Both him and his wife are fascinating.
Has anyone watched both the American and the British version of this show? If so how similar are they? I watched the British one ages ago and loved it, and am anticipating this show. I hope that this version builds on the original and doesn't just go over the same themes without adding anything.
So, in Episode 10:Why didn't Peter recognize the hooker?
Probably thought she was Kristen Stewart, like the rest of us.
Seriously though, that threw me off too. I suppose he was too drunk or high the first time to maintain that memory? That's all I could think of.
Just finished episode 13.
I think Francis will use the vice presidency to undermine the president and become the nomination for 2016.
After watching this show. It's pretty laughable that Homeland has won emmy's.
I don';t see anything beating this next year. unless they give Breaking Bad some parting gifts.
Last epJust finished episode 13.
I think Francis will use the vice presidency to undermine the president and become the nomination for 2016.
Probably thought she was Kristen Stewart, like the rest of us.
Seriously though, that threw me off too. I suppose he was too drunk or high the first time to maintain that memory? That's all I could think of.
Probably thought she was Kristen Stewart, like the rest of us.
Seriously though, that threw me off too. I suppose he was too drunk or high the first time to maintain that memory? That's all I could think of.
Unlikely. Underwood will have Walker resign/impeached by the end of the next season. If they plan to end it he'll fall as Urquhardt did in the book, or he will kill off Zoe and the series will go on to how he governs.
Last ep
I found it funny how much of a figurehead he is. He was totally oblivious to all that was happening with frank getting the nom
I wouldn't underestimate mad men.After watching this show. It's pretty laughable that Homeland has won emmy's.
I don';t see anything beating this next year. unless they give Breaking Bad some parting gifts.
I wouldn't underestimate mad men.
Last ep
I found it funny how much of a figurehead he is. He was totally oblivious to all that was happening with frank getting the nom
Episode 5, Union stuff:
I think the portrayal of the teamsters as borderline animals, basically like rabid paid homeless people, was pretty problematic. I think the ethnic dimension was a problem, but I think the political dimension was even more of one--the issues being debated in the education bill are substantive ones, and real educators would be concerned with them, and I think real union members would be concerned with them in solidarity, in particular the provisions concerning collective bargaining. I think portraying the picketers as a rowdy mob, commanded by a lobbyist, rather than as literate and articulate individuals, is pretty gross. The framing of the issue dimensions had been pretty vibrant and nuanced up until now, but this seemed very base and obvious. Too bad.
(I highly doubt the average viewer is going to care about that, of course)
Episode 5, Union stuff:
I think the portrayal of the teamsters as borderline animals, basically like rabid paid homeless people, was pretty problematic. I think the ethnic dimension was a problem, but I think the political dimension was even more of one--the issues being debated in the education bill are substantive ones, and real educators would be concerned with them, and I think real union members would be concerned with them in solidarity, in particular the provisions concerning collective bargaining. I think portraying the picketers as a rowdy mob, commanded by a lobbyist, rather than as literate and articulate individuals, is pretty gross. The framing of the issue dimensions had been pretty vibrant and nuanced up until now, but this seemed very base and obvious. Too bad.
(I highly doubt the average viewer is going to care about that, of course)
[Episode 7]WTF @ Claire giving a handjob to the dying bodyguard at the hospital! O__O
That's what I actually thought she'd do so I guess that means the character work is consistent.
I won't lie. A lot of that went over my head. But:weren't the picketers mostly just people off the street, not actual union members?
Pretty sure they said just grab anybody that looks smart so you dont know for sure who they were.
I love Madmen, but it would have to be twice as good as last season.
Nobody should beat Kevin Spacey though. Nobody.
As interesting and fascinating Kevin Spacey's character is in this show, Don Draper is still a much more better character in general imo. I'm still in shock that Jon Hamm hasn't won any of the Best Lead Actors at the Emmys (well when went up against Bryan Cranston it was understandable but last year he should of won)
I think Spacey is just playing the character he was in 'Midnight in The Garden of Good and Evil'. I think he was some asshole southern lawyer in that movie.
But yes he is amazing.
I also like the use of news footage in the show. They use real networks, not fake ones
So is this show worth a month sub?
Episode 5, Union stuff:
I think the portrayal of the teamsters as borderline animals, basically like rabid paid homeless people, was pretty problematic. I think the ethnic dimension was a problem, but I think the political dimension was even more of one--the issues being debated in the education bill are substantive ones, and real educators would be concerned with them, and I think real union members would be concerned with them in solidarity, in particular the provisions concerning collective bargaining. I think portraying the picketers as a rowdy mob, commanded by a lobbyist, rather than as literate and articulate individuals, is pretty gross. The framing of the issue dimensions had been pretty vibrant and nuanced up until now, but this seemed very base and obvious. Too bad.
(I highly doubt the average viewer is going to care about that, of course)
(episode 5 continued)
The initial dialogue inside the union office might lead you to believe it, but listen closely. He first says "Get me 200 teachers", and then when the aide reacts as though that's a tough order, he says "fine, then, just get me 200 bodies"--he then follows-up with a remark about the Teamsters, and there's a throwaway line like "Tell 'em to dress smart and we'll give 'em glasses if we need to".
The implication is that as a union organizer, he's calling in members of other unions. He's also involved with getting the hotel staff to disallow the event, as well, right?
And then when the party decides to give the food to the protest, Spacey says directly to the viewer, something along the lines of "Nothing can come between Teamsters and food." -- which is actually a pretty hilarious joke given the stories I've heard about Hollywood filming craft services tables.
Up until this point, the show characterizes the union reps as smart people fighting for their own interests, which is fine. But at this point, suddenly they're kind of portrayed as almost animalistic, it's pretty gross. The protestor who is in focus in the shot in particular is visually disgusting to look at, practically foaming at the mouth, clearly physically dirty. As a critique of a union protest, that's pretty crummy politics.
But if it's not a union protest, then you can read the shot as primarily racial. A group full of wealthy whites delivering food to an angry pack of largely non-white people, portrayed in a kind of animal fashion.
I only mention it because this is a very meticulous show in terms of its visual composition. There are many, many, many shots that I've paused and said "wow, I totally get what they're going for here", so I'm fairly confident I'm not reading something into nothing when I notice something