RurouniZel
Asks questions so Ezalc doesn't have to
:fakeyuri
Oh wait, :SDBurton.![]()
Nothin' fake about SD's yuri, no goggles required.
I however, wear my yuri goggles frequently. ;P
:fakeyuri
Oh wait, :SDBurton.![]()
:duckroll = failed to live up to the hype. Only teasing.
Anyway, Spice and Wolf is not worth your time.
It means major plot developments.I know what :dtl implies but...
What does :firehawk mean? Same question for :chet
wat
Anyway, Spice and Wolf is not worth your time.
You can't let fake yuri ruin the sanctity and purity of real yuri!Nothin' fake about SD's yuri, no goggles required.
I however, wear my yuri goggles frequently. ;P
I know this is shiitake.
![]()
A pun based on "essa hoisa"?
![]()
The first pun here is "zouringen".
![]()
This is supposed to be based on the Japanese word for pun.
*no screen because it's not worth it*
I however, wear my yuri goggles frequently. ;P
Gintama 261
![]()
Tsuki~~~~.
Also, no episode preview, so I guess cosmic was right.![]()
Tamako Market - Episode 5
Zzzzzzzzzzzz. Okay, so the episode wasn't dreadful, but it's pretty meh compared to the last two weeks. This show really feels empty when it is focusing on Tamako or something directly related to Tamako. She is an uninteresting character, and sort of a blank slate. That sort of protagonist can work if the narrative is told from her perspective about other characters. That's not the case here though. The focus of the narrative in the show shifts depending on who they want to follow in a given episode, and it feels much strong when it is about the supporting cast.
Tamako's relationships and how people relate to her are simply not that interesting, especially with the way she reacts (or fails to react), making it feel pointless and boring. It was an issue in the earlier episodes, and it is an issue here. On the other hand, when the show focused specifically on individual characters without dealing directly with Tamako, it is pretty damn enjoyable. Feels kinda sad that such a otherwise well produced show has a weak link in the storytelling which is so obvious. You would think it's something they could easily catch in the conceptual stage and fix.
I don't think your issues with the show were something they overlooked. At the very least, Yamada and Yoshida expressed that they wanted Tamako's characterization to primarily come from the people around her. If it's boring, I don't think it's due to an oversight. It's probably just due to poor execution or an issue with how they implemented their concept.
Yoshida: Tamako is a girl whos very proactive in the shopping district, but theres very few scenes that show her point of view. If I really had to say, the scenario became a show where you see Tamakos emotions from the reactions/point of view of those around her. Instead of being a show girl, shes a girl who loves her familys business, her shopping district and is just full of love. That doesnt exclude outsiders too. Shes been brought up very well.
Dam pigs!Fuck da police, etc.
Because you're better off overlooking my posts.:BGBW - Yuru Yuri/ Akarin
I did say I was only teasing.
ANN finally posted their Denpa Onna-focused interview with Shinbo. It's worth a read.
http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/interview/2013-02-07/interview-akiyuki-simbo
電波女? At first I thought you meant 電波的な彼女. I really wanted that to be picked up as an 1-cour.
I don't think your issues with the show were something they overlooked. At the very least, Yamada and Yoshida expressed that they wanted Tamako's characterization to primarily come from the people around her. If it's boring, I don't think it's due to an oversight. It's probably just due to poor execution or an issue with how they implemented their concept.
I kinda disagree that it's not something they overlooked, considering:
This is a good idea if that's what they're actually doing (ie: ep2-4), but it's a terrible idea if the story requires the audience to at least be somewhat invested in Tamako as a character for the scenario to work. There's no real reason to focus on something which means nothing whatosever to the audience. It becomes hollow and boring. It's not just the execution of the material, but the decision to build episodes around something this weak.
Nothin' fake about SD's yuri, no goggles required.
I however, wear my yuri goggles frequently. ;P
You can't let fake yuri ruin the sanctity and purity of real yuri
please dont hype valvrave and Ginga Kikoutai: Majestic Prince![]()
GJ-bu 5
This episode was alright, I'd say it had too much Kyolo suffering. At least next week we get lots of imoutos.
Mitsuho, stop using Japanese on NeoGAF. It doesn't make you look smart, it doesn't make you cool, it just makes it harder for regular people to talk to you. Which could also annoy them. This is not some hippy foreign language message board, it is an English videogame forum. Thanks.![]()
Laying down the law! BAM!
Just saying what people have been thinking for a while now. While it started out as "kinda cute" for those of us who could read it, it's turning into a self-parody now. Better to terminate it before it turns into a bad joke.
Nonoriri (our true Nonoriri) would be another 'bro' from there... if only he still posted around here... :-(/XX/ is my Evageeks bro.
That's nothing, yesterday in the manga i noticed "Midichlorians" in a 1994/1996 printing... Episode 1 didn't come out til 1999.
http://www.evamonkey.com/randomimages/midichlorians.gif
Yep, it was an intended reference to that film all along. I don't know what it was present on the actual stage from the Young Ace magazine serialization, and as they sometimes change... things (be advised; explicit content ahead), I'm not sure if it figured the same text on it, but seeing the publishing dates of the 'Volume 6' by Kadokawa Shoten I have right now on my hands shows the compilation was made from 'STAGE.34' (the one in question) to 'STAGE.40' serialized through December, 1999 to March-April, 2000 and July-November, 2000 (初岀/『月刊少年エース』´99年 12月 号、´00年 2〜4月 号、7〜11月 号That particular episode was published in December 1999.
Ha, ha! No need to apologize... it was a comment made tongue-in-cheek, my pal.My apologies. I skimmed the thread, must have just missed it. ;_;
It's already a bad joke. And I'm bad with jokes...
There is nothing wrong with too much yuri.You fell off the path of the righteous long ago. You can't even identify what's real anymore!
Laying down the law! BAM!
Yeah, sorry! Man, seems like I haven't been careful lately...You should probably note that there are naked boobs in that link.
Man, I kinda wish Oreimo was better
Didn't they adapt virtually the entire thing in the OVA? There wouldn't have been enough material to justify remaking the whole thing.
Just saying what people have been thinking for a while now. While it started out as "kinda cute" for those of us who could read it, it's turning into a self-parody now. Better to terminate it before it turns into a bad joke.
Yeah, sorry! Man, seems like I haven't been careful lately...
Here's a truly sad story. I had totally missed this post because I haven't been reading the thread as regularly lately. But because of his Japanese posting, I got curious and decided to check his post history to see how annoying it actually was, and saw that. Poor junior member.![]()
So, the ban is permanent then? I think Mitsuho wasn't serious with that, it was only a way of talking referring to the topic they were commenting about at that moment. Most probably it was a 4Chan "impression", as kayos90 aptly says below that post.Here's a truly sad story. I had totally missed this post because I haven't been reading the thread as regularly lately. But because of his Japanese posting, I got curious and decided to check his post history to see how annoying it actually was, and saw that. Poor junior member.![]()
Saya always does her job wellI see people have been Saya-protected in my hour-long absence from here.
I was thinking more along the lines of "cheeky cheek" but sure that works too.:BGBW - Yuru Yuri/ Akarin
What would that mean?!:Theonik
The lesson to draw here is to keep a low profile especially as a junior. If you don't, your past sins will also be exposed.Here's a truly sad story. I had totally missed this post because I haven't been reading the thread as regularly lately. But because of his Japanese posting, I got curious and decided to check his post history to see how annoying it actually was, and saw that. Poor junior member.![]()
It would have been a ban regardless with the recent GAF rules.I think you're taking that quote out of context there, but whatever. He probably should have put a disclaimer in the post.
So, the ban is permanent then? I think Mitsuho wasn't serious with that, it was only a way of talking referring to the topic they were commenting about at that moment. Most probably it was a 4Chan "impression", as kayos90 aptly says below that post.