• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Feminists hijack #INeedMasculismBecause hashtag. Misandry is real.

  • Thread starter Thread starter kittens
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Feminism is about equality. If you want cultural and legal equality for men and women, then you are a feminist.

And masculism is based on the belief that equality between the sexes requires the recognition and redress of prejudice and discrimination against men as well as women .
 
yeah because they are most of the time lol

the 'white knight' label is based on the hugely outdated paradigm of chivalry, where men would nobly protect women on the tacit understanding they would get sex from it.

feminists want to maintain the advantages they got under chivalry and do away with the 'obligations'

Um, no. No, they don't. I believe your sources of information might be just a bit biased.
 
OHHHH the old "all men's problems are caused by the patriarchy" NONSENSE apex fallacy.

If you want to call a system that is dominated by 0.1% of men as an elite class and severely repressed all the others patriarchy, go ahead. Keep pretending that anti-male discrimination in family and criminal courts doesn't exist. Keep pretending shit laws like VAWA aren't criminalising men on trumped up charges while funneling money to radfem organisations who would happily commit genocide against "genetically inferior" males.

Jesus Christ this forum is so full of white knights it hurts :)

Wow, NeoGAF does have all kinds!

Please, tell me, what are the demographics of the 0.1%? This way we can glean an idea who is in charge and thus has a vested interest in keeping the system the same.
 
You sound like someone who doesn't interact much with women.

ok it was a matter of time before this came out lol. Anyone arguing for mens human rights gets hit with "you're a loner virgin then?" within 5 seconds

I interact a lot with women. and yes I have had sexual intercourse on MANY OCCASIONS :D
 
yeah because they are most of the time lol

the 'white knight' label is based on the hugely outdated paradigm of chivalry, where men would nobly protect women on the tacit understanding they would get sex from it.

feminists want to maintain the advantages they got under chivalry and do away with the 'obligations'

Holy shit! You are unbelievable.
 
feminists want to maintain the advantages they got under chivalry and do away with the 'obligations'

So you think it's unfair for women to aspire towards a future in which they aren't expected to fuck someone as a means of securing some semblance of stature in their life?

Also - the "advantages" of chivalry - if you could list them, and point out exactly how much worth those advantages GOT most women in those bygone days of yore...
 
Feminism is about equality. If you want cultural and legal equality for men and women, then you are a feminist.

Ideally yes. But like with most ideologies the people that are the most vocal are way too pushy and annoying about it to the point of it being counterproductive.
 
hahahahaha no. take a look on radfemhub one of these days

there are tons of feminists who are supremacists and openly hate males

I think the Men's Rights Advocates that are lampooned in these tweets are probably the equivalent example of polar opposite feminists that say stupid things. It would be like someone dismissing the complaints of feminists because of some stupid shit some crazy person says on one of those sites about hating men.

It really should all be about equality and not some competition about who's oppressed more or whose oppression is underrated or underrepresented.
 
ok it was a matter of time before this came out lol. Anyone arguing for mens human rights gets hit with "you're a loner virgin then?" within 5 seconds :D
Not even. I just refuse to believe that anyone who has any notion of real female perspectives on the world could profess to believe what you do.
 
That would be feminism...

I'm starting to think that the name should be changed for the sake of those who don't know. Plenty of women, even, describe their views, which is essentially the goal of feminism, then say that they aren't feminists. Name doesn't help, I don't think.

Already has a name, it's called civil rights.
 
I feel like this thread is going to turn into a minefield.

Already is. Me and Lopaz stepped on the first two. Be careful guys!

Seriously Lopaz don't even bother. This is not the forum for anything like this. I don't even know if I agree with everything your saying since I am drunk, but I probably do agree to some or most of it. RIP homie we gonna get through this. Mainly radical feminists suck. I respect women, raised that way. Or my mom would whoop my ass. But fuck the radical types.
 
the name and everything they do.

the minute feminists start demanding equal time for equal crimes, equal custody rights, or equal registration for the draft is the day I believe they care one tiny bit about men

NEXT

This. It's like the white knights don't realise these double standards exist.
 
Okay, you mean IGNORING people. That's not "treating them with ignorance." The two words aren't interchangeable.

I thought the context would get the point across. I'll edit it so people can stop stumbling over it.

Point still stands though. I see which side you're on and the keyword here is extreme vs balance.
 
So you think it's unfair for women to aspire towards a future in which they aren't expected to fuck someone as a means of securing some semblance of stature in their life?

nope I think it's great. I want equal rights. But to claim feminist organisations want that is a JOKE. they will never argue anything that takes away from female privileges in the name of equality
 
Wow, NeoGAF does have all kinds!

Please, tell me, what are the demographics of the 0.1%? This way we can glean an idea who is in charge and thus has a vested interest in keeping the system the same.

While I don't agree with that dude, I do think that the baby boomer generation in general is holding everything back. These are the people who have raised us up and it's all I can think of why things still are held back. Sorry if that wasn't phrased well.

Edit: I don't even think that's what he was talking about but oh well...
 
CHEEZMO™;47490660 said:
MRAs are basically the gender equivalent of the people who go "WHY NO WHITE HISTORY MONTH, HUH?!?!?! IT'S RACISM AGAINST WHITES, Y'SEE!!!"

Then again given how much crossover there is in the Racist/MRA Venn diagramme it isn't very surprising.

It's difficult for some to disassociate their own lives from how two demographics in general interact or how a particular demographic is generally treated.
 
And masculism is based on the belief that equality between the sexes requires the recognition and redress of prejudice and discrimination against men as well as women .

I think the Men's Rights Advocates that are lampooned in these tweets are probably the equivalent example of polar opposite feminists that say stupid things. It would be like someone dismissing the complaints of feminists because of some stupid shit some crazy person says on one of those sites about hating men.

It really should all be about equality and not some competition about who's oppressed more or whose oppression is underrated or underrepresented.

Amen.
 
That is feminism actually. The term has become distorted.

That always tends to happen when someone wants to discredit another group. They take the worst ideas and worst members that can be associated with a movement and try to make that the entire purpose of the group.
 
Not even. I just refuse to believe that anyone who has any notion of real female perspectives on the world could profess to believe what you do.

I see what women read in magazines and newspapers every day I guess? Mostly 'men are shit because they have no empathy like us and won't pick up their socks'

besides I never mentioned women in general. I'm talking about the hate movement known as feminism
 
yeah because they are most of the time lol

the 'white knight' label is based on the hugely outdated paradigm of chivalry, where men would nobly protect women on the tacit understanding they would get sex from it.

feminists want to maintain the advantages they got under chivalry and do away with the 'obligations'

Yes, women just want to hold on to all those advantages they had in the 1300s.
 
Lopaz don't even try bro. Not worth them cuffs.

(Btw bet your a virgin hurrrrrrrrrrrrrrr - only response they got)

haha thanks man! I wanna bring the fight here because this forum has dumbass feminist threads EVERY. SINGLE. DAY!!!

Someone's gotta break up the obscene groupthink going on
 
Here's a question

Imagine you are sitting on a train. You're in your late 20's. The train is pretty packed. A girl gets on in her late 20's. There's nothing wrong with her. She doesn't look tired/pregnant/unwell.

Should you automatically give your seat to that woman purely on the basis that she's female?

I'm not asking if it's nice to do so. It's always nice to give to others, male and female regardless.
 
Here's a question

Imagine you are sitting on a train. You're in your late 20's. The train is pretty packed. A girl gets on in her late 20's. There's nothing wrong with her. She doesn't look tired/pregnant/unwell.

Should you automatically give your seat to that woman purely on the basis that she's female?

I'm not asking if it's nice to do so. It's always nice to give to others, male and female regardless.
Nope.
 
Yes, women just want to hold on to all those advantages they had in the 1300s.

Funny you should say that ... people are always harping on about how women had it bad in the past but in reality they didnt.

Men have died in their millions in wars that women never had to fight. Theyve always worked the shittiest and most dangerous jobs in far greater numbers while women got to sit at home raising babies.

And guess what... MEN didnt have the right to vote until recently either, save the very tiny minority of wealthy landowners. also be aware the suffragettes werent after votes for everyone... they only wanted them for rich women
 
I see what women read in magazines and newspapers every day I guess? Mostly 'men are shit because they have no empathy like us and won't pick up their socks'
Just like all men read about how women are frigid bitches who won't give it up on request, amirite? You're unbelievable.
 
I see what women read in magazines and newspapers every day I guess? Mostly 'men are shit because they have no empathy like us and won't pick up their socks'

Dude if you see that everyday you're either seeing the same women everyday or just seeing what you want to see.
 
Lopaz don't even try bro. Not worth them cuffs.

(Btw bet your a virgin hurrrrrrrrrrrrrrr - only response they got)

Hey, it's pretty easy to hide a poorly thought out argument behind a persecution complex. But you wouldn't do that, would you? Because a real man would argue his point and change his mind if shown conclusive evidence and sound reasoning that is contrary to his original assertions.

Right?
 
Everybody simmer the hell down.

Lopaz, if you want to make a case about something you need to structure an argument clearly. Do not just make a series of hit and run remarks. As it stands you have about 40 people arguing with you and you have no hope of responding to it all, so perhaps make a general post explaining where you are coming from instead. In the process of this, be respectful.

Everybody else - stop dogpiling, and although filled with righteous indignation, you, too, should remain calm and respectful. It is no secret that these topics are minefields and I can't imagine this thread is not going to end in somebody getting banned. Still, fingers crossed.
 
I see what women read in magazines and newspapers every day I guess? Mostly 'men are shit because they have no empathy like us and won't pick up their socks'

besides I never mentioned women in general. I'm talking about the hate movement known as feminism

I know what you're saying man. Us nice guys have feelings too.
 
Here's a question

Imagine you are sitting on a train. You're in your late 20's. The train is pretty packed. A girl gets on in her late 20's. There's nothing wrong with her. She doesn't look tired/pregnant/unwell.

Should you automatically give your seat to that woman purely on the basis that she's female?

I'm not asking if it's nice to do so. It's always nice to give to others, male and female regardless.

She can stand. Only give up your seat to older people or more broadly people that may have trouble with standing in a packed train.
 
OHHHH the old "all men's problems are caused by the patriarchy" NONSENSE apex fallacy.

If you want to call a system that is dominated by 0.1% of men as an elite class and severely repressed all the others patriarchy, go ahead. Keep pretending that anti-male discrimination in family and criminal courts doesn't exist.

Are you aware that women are currently favored in family court BECAUSE of patriarchy? The idea that the man is the provider and the woman is the caretaker has an effect on how judgements are rendered.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom