umop_3pisdn
Member
It's the most plausible way of reading your posts that makes sense, taking them at face value doesn't.
Why do Asians have the best hair but small breasts?
- Thread starter genjiZERO
- Start date
- Status
It's the most plausible way of reading your posts that makes sense, taking them at face value doesn't.
Dice
Pokémon Parentage Conspiracy Theorist
overall form > parts
I'm sorry man. This is ridiculous. Can I ask you a serious question? Do you have a small penis? Is there something functionally wrong with your unit?
I really don't understand trying to justify or seek answers otherwise.
Femmeworth
Banned
I would think it best to not admit such things.
lmao
No way. I can tell the difference. I have spent the equivalent to the amount of free time some men have in an entire lifetime staring at boobs.
Accidentally used the wrong browser where she is signed in, D'oh.
Soyongdori
Member
Well, those Asian doctors are pro at it.
XiaNaphryz
LATIN, MATRIPEDICABUS, DO YOU SPEAK IT
A lot of asians have curly or wavy hair. Hell, my daughter's hair is so curly it barely reaches her shoulder when it drops naturally, but it goes almost to her waist when wet after a bath.
Plenty of naturally busty asians in California.
I don't know how in your face it has to be. There are websites dedicated to naturally busty pornstars.
Right...
blitzcloud
Banned
I'm sorry man. This is ridiculous. Can I ask you a serious question? Do you have a small penis? Is there something functionally wrong with your unit?
I really don't understand trying to justify or seek answers otherwise.
I thought this thread was about evolution itself. We created the fact of bigger=better in sexual terms. There's proof that it indeed matters (not the only aspect). But if we were driven to a cultural blend, penis would shrink (example, blasian would mean shrink of penis for the black part, enhancement for the asian part). It doesn't mean that it's worse if the receptive sexual organ is based on the same mix of genes. But that's just an assumption i'm making.
Btw I answered to the question on top. If you see my posts i'm normally a devil's advocate... I don't take a side, I just put my theory on the table and see what people think.
MWS Natural
Member
blitzcloud
Banned
do the same with 17. Pretty much same results. Kinda amazing huh, that people worry when they have above average dicks?
Soyongdori
Member
I believe there was an article once about how there is a technology that lets doctors enlarge female breasts using stem cells and body fat that makes breasts look naturally large, invented in Asia. This means silicone is out of date.
It may look big, but all you see is just big empty balloon with nothing in it.
It may look big, but all you see is just big empty balloon with nothing in it.
HappyBivouac
Member
I actually was not talking about size. I was saying "why do men tend to focus on those areas of the body when it comes to sexual attraction?"
I prefer small/average and shapely as well. Not that that matters.
Oh, ok I got you. My bad. Well they're called secondary sexual characteristics. In particular they let you identify females or males of your species. So that would be my guess on why men focus on them.
blame space
Banned
let's whip em out, boys.
Trent Strong
Banned
Do you think that there aren't any traits that people are biologically predisposed to find attrative? Symmetry? Blemish-free skin? Certain waist to hip ratios? There is scientific evidence that certain traits do indicate health and fecundity. And they've done experiments where they show pictures of people of a huge variety of ethnicities and cultures to people of completely different ethnicities and cultures all over the world, and these people from all these different cultures usually agree on which people in these pictures are the most attractive. They've done studies that show that babies tend to look longer at attractive people's faces longer than unattractive people's faces. I mean, did people in hunter gatherer, pre-civilization tribes find every person equally attractive, because they had no culture to influence them? Is there a culture in history that would find Rosie O'Donnel more attractive than, say, Rachel McAdams? Every aspect of what people find attractive in a mate is cultural, and none of it biological? That is mind bogglingly absurd. And while standards of beauty do change over time and culture, I don't think there's any evidence that standards of beauty change drastically. Give me some examples of drastic change.
So you advertise that you have a big dick then fail to preform in clutch time? Also, define well endowed.
EagleBurnn
Banned
Never thought about it, but Asian girl's hair is always sexy. And I prefer small-normal sized boobs, large ones are unattractive to me, so Eagle has your back, Asians. Don't you worry!
HappyBivouac
Member
It's also worth noting that the line between the culturally-influenced and the "intrinsic" is severely blurred.
BocoDragon
or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Realize This Assgrab is Delicious
Not to speak for him... but I didn't think he was making a claim that there are no innate biological standards of attraction, but that large breasts isn't a necessary part of that. There's no functional reason why we have to go after large breasts as mammals.
Although personally I think it's clear that 'full breast' attraction is a part of our biology at this point.... but it's not because of function, but arbitrary sexual selection, like peacock plumage. Large breasts don't confer a reproductive advantage, and scientists actually have to dig deep to theorize why they got so big in humans.
Dice
Pokémon Parentage Conspiracy Theorist
Because that's what we made taboo/tantalizing? I'll just as soon be dazed by fantastic legs or stomach. I think attraction is on the whole, but attention and admiration is from contexts and socialization.
blitzcloud
Banned
But culture does change the views of society as a whole. I still remember seeing that advertisement for a chocolate where it showed you'd get fat. Being fat=having food=being healthy.
Nowadays it's like NOOO need less calories on my already light chocolate!
And we also pass some snippets of genetic memory to the next generation, even if it's not as clear as in the wild animal kingdom.
I believe you have more than just informational interest in this. Nah, kidding. But the overall reaction I got for defending "smaller penises" is the demonstration that males live obsessed with it, even if secretly. Every word that is not praising the "big one" seems to be a subtle hint that you have a small penis. Because, why would you defend the "bullied" if you're the "bully"? it doesn't seem to make sense.
Now the problem is that I cannot conduct the same experiment while cheering for the bigger is better side. I wonder if anyone would have said anything.
Also, as my last contribution for now, I must say that here in Spain I don't see much obsession over outer aspect. The deep surgeries that seem to be mainstream to look good in the US are uncommon here. Why am I mixing surgery here? because façade, that's all it seems to matter for some people, specially when acting like they have a certain size of penis when they do not. Not pointing any fingers, just saying what I've come across. In my case when I see those advertisements of "retarding effect for males condoms", I kinda laugh. I've endured over an hour sessions with normal condoms without reaching climax... I don't even want to imagine how that would be. it all makes sense when you hear other males saying they are ready before 10 minutes, but they try to endure it till she's ready too. I don't know, since I take sex as something to do with that special someone and i've just had one so far, I can't say much more about it.
cock fight!
Trent Strong
Banned
Oops, I might have grossly overstated what gengi was saying. And I agree that huge boobs don't offer any kind advantage like better breast feeding or anything like that. And I like small boobs better than big boobs myself.
BocoDragon
or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Realize This Assgrab is Delicious
I can appreciate what you thought you were arguing against. "Beauty's all in the eye of the beholder, maaaaan".
hypostasis
Banned
In this thread, lots of men obsess over penis.
While we're on the topic, as I understand things, probably sexual selection has taken place as far as human penis size is concerned since our junk is significantly larger than any other apes' on both a proportional and absolute basis and because -- as Mr "I'm only 7.1 inches" pointed out -- we are much larger than is necessary to achieve the requisite sexual function.
While we're on the topic, as I understand things, probably sexual selection has taken place as far as human penis size is concerned since our junk is significantly larger than any other apes' on both a proportional and absolute basis and because -- as Mr "I'm only 7.1 inches" pointed out -- we are much larger than is necessary to achieve the requisite sexual function.
Parallax
best seen in the classic "Shadow of the Beast"
blitzcloud
Banned
welcome to the Smallpeens. lol.
PS: In another forum, in a thread that basically asked for member sizes... one guy said he was 28cm. Well, it's possible. Everyone remained silent from that point, still trying to compute the massive dick measure he mentioned. I promptly asked..."do you start measuring from your anus?" Minutes later I had lots of "kudos" to my post. Secretly secretly agreeing with the fact it seemed a bullshit measure.
Ken K in the Fresh!!!
Member
wished I had wavy hair :/
wanna touch dixxx?
Do go on, I speak for everyone on neogaf that we all want to hear about your measurements.
hypostasis
Banned
I'll simply observe in passing that to me, obsession over size one way or another seems childlike and is typically indicative of a relative lack of experience, given that so much goes into amazing sex above and beyond penis size.
/penistalk
Well that's entirely too much text to digest so I'll say this:
a) In China, at least until recently, obese women were the standard of beauty. The more chins a woman had the more beautiful she was considered. This is evidenced by paintings from that time period (look at their necks). Why? Because being fat meant you had food and weren't poor. So I have a feeling Rosie O'Donnel might be more desirable in Ming China than Rachel McAdams.
b) As far as your science goes I'd love to take a look at it if you can link me some things. Especially, if these studies show that certain phenotypes actually are more fecund than others.
c) I've never said "every". You've read that into my statement.
d) I can do this easily and already have in A.
e) the lettering is because I'm too lazy to write paragraphs and not because I'm being a dick.
BocoDragon said:
Except that smaller breasts have evidently been selected for amongst East Asians. So at some point Asians clearly preferred women with smaller breasts (and still do?). On the other hand some populations clearly have selected for larger breasts (assuming that the breast size data is accurate). So unless there's some trend over time where breasts are increasing in size I really do think it's unlikely that it really matters at the end of the day... from a fecundity point of view.
blitzcloud
Banned
well that was it? I mean, like 3 people asked for it so I just ahead and said it. It doesn't bother me lol. The infantile mindset where you can't talk about evolution because the thread turned into a "but asians have small dicks so that's clearly inferior" without being tagged "smallpeen" does bother, speaking of a constructive discussion.
Dante: Or when you have learned a metric system that makes sense for everyone in school.
At least no male pattern baldness.
blitzcloud
Banned
That's a large appendix for sure. At that point you have to wonder if he has erectile dysfunction.
TheKaeptain
Banned
I've noticed.
Haha, I'm just razzin' you a bit man. Take pride in your body.
- Status