-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
Battlefield 4 Unveil - March 26 - San Francisco - [Wallpaper] - [Teaser Webpage]
- Thread starter RoKKeR
- Start date
DouglasteR
Member
Based on DEAICE
Me too, for those who didnt take any DLC one by one.....
ReturnOfTheRAT
Member
BF3 with Premium is the best DLC pack/subscription.
DouglasteR failed at making a funny.
DouglasteR failed at making a funny.
Metalmurphy
Member
And BF3 wasn't a DICE game published by EA?
Future PhaZe
Member
I just hope they really take it to the next level. Are they using a new engine?
My favorite part is he went with DEAICE instead of DICEA.
TimeEffect
Member
This model must be pretty beneficial to EA, no? Compared to Activision:
Release Battlefield one year, support the game with $60 worth of content, no need to put resources towards single player or new features/engine upgrades.
Then repeat the following year.
Release Battlefield one year, support the game with $60 worth of content, no need to put resources towards single player or new features/engine upgrades.
Then repeat the following year.
Still frostbite 2 i think, but A LOT more of it from the sounds of it ( like BF3 only used 30 to 40% of it)
rakkadakka
Member
Maybe as a downloadable or expansion pack like bc2 vietnam.
WW2 doesn't offer these devs near the range of attachments of current weapons.
How else can they balance suppressor v flash suppressor v heavy barrel v bunny rabbit launcher? Tommy guns didn't have much.. drum clip.. uh.. not drum clip.
~Devil Trigger~
In favor of setting Muslim women on fire
Are we advised?
schwabdizzle
Banned
I will be playing Bioshock Infinate therefore I will not care.
DouglasteR
Member
And didnt it happened almost exactly like my schedule ?
Dammit !! yours is so better
jacksepticeye
Member
Metalmurphy
Member
Not really no. You got the pricing wrong, you got the dates wrong, you forgot premium, and most importantly, you made it sound like it was a bad thing, when BF3 expansions have actually been great and premium was great value for money.
SapientWolf
Trucker Sexologist
That's why I don't like it when people lump everyone in EA together, like they're the borg. Some people there actually know what they're doing.
This is what I like to call PR bullshit.
TheVoidDragon
Member
I'm looking forward to this, but i don't really see how they can make it significantly different to Battlefield 3. Obviously there will be new weapons, Vehicles and maps but i can't really think of anything massive that they could do with it other than perhaps more destroyable things.
I'm still a bit disappointed that Battlefield 3 is being replaced already, i would of prefered a new Bad Company or something like a BF2143.
I'm still a bit disappointed that Battlefield 3 is being replaced already, i would of prefered a new Bad Company or something like a BF2143.
I think there will be some kind of presistent element to it.
rakkadakka
Member
I hope they take it out back and shoot it.
Probably not going to happen, but it'd be great if they applied those resources toward better co-op or MP.
Tokyo Rain
Member
My PS4 is ready.
firehawk12
Subete no aware
I hope there's no singleplayer campaign this time. Unless they decide to make SP a Bad Company game.
You mean when it's declared 'Gold'?Can't wait for the beta.
Tokyo Rain
Member
singleplayerlol
You must not have played Homefront.
Naked Lunch
Member
Return of the commanders.
Return of giving squads and teams more detailed commands, which means more team communication.
Higher player counts on consoles.
CTF on ALL maps from day one right with Rush and Conquest.
=
significantly better than BF3.
rakkadakka
Member
In BF4 they're going to be scrapping the bottom of the "new gun" barrel to come up with something that isn't a rehash of what was in BF3.
Quick, everyone to the SHOT show!
+integrated VOIP for teams rather than just friends on Battlelog.
+lots of meaningful destruction on all maps rather than having it added as an afterthought.
More factions, female soldiers, 60fps on consoles, etc., there is plenty of new things BF4 could bring to the table.
Homefront had a better SP campaign.
MP? BF3 is king.
I'm still shocked anyone plays the single player portions of these games.
Also whoever was wishing for ww2... Really? The genre dished out endless ww2 games for a good 4 years strait. Let it rest.
Very much like the idea of it taking place in a modern city. I really don't want to do any more desert or Middle East shit for the billionth time. (Which has been done to death as much as ww2 has)
VibratingDonkey
Member
Anton Sugar
Member
Eh, there are plenty of weapons that are in the running for use by armed forces. Arma 3 has some of them, too, from LWRC:
I don't think they'll have any trouble adding more weapons.
Pretty damn excited for this, even if it won't be a massive change. As someone who was only able to play BF3 on the Xbox 360, as others have already said, this is going to bring a long list if improvements for us console players (higher player count, better frame rate, etc.). My body is ready.
I never booted up the single player for BF3.
rakkadakka
Member
BF3 has a huge variety of modern weapons already, it'd be a pleasant surprise if they manage not to repeat most of them in BF4.
Anton Sugar
Member
I sure hope so. I feel like they got a bit better in the DLC, but overall, they were pretty low detail. I wouldn't mind them including all of the BF3 weapons with more detailed models.
I think they'll stick with the same caliber-based firearms system, too.
I don't mind the SP, they just need to make it more open like in MP.
Not even for the rat QTE? I had to see that myself.
Hah! I just watched that on YouTube instead, and holy shit, video games