what i only can see is the "3ds" lineup. there is no real WiiU lineup.
For the WiiU we only "knew" there are doing something, but i think they aren't ready with many games to show. Sure, we will see Mario Kart and something like Mario 3D. But that's all. I don't think, they will show a Zelda. (maybe a "there's something more...")
And they cannot show Pikmin AGAIN. There's still Wind Waker, but please: We know how the game plays/know the story. It's just a revamp. Everything else i think, is not ready. They are just slow.
But how many views do Nintendo directs get? The live streams I've watched have maybe a few thousand viewing - I guess YouTube and other channels like eshop adds a lot more.
But abandoning a big press event seems odd to me. They need to communicate more and show us more, yet they are planning closed events focusing on US releases?
With some of our recent installments of Nintendo Direct, it became common to see total views for a single video reach five hundred to six hundred thousand in a matter of about 10 days on the Nintendo eShop while they did not show apparent growth on YouTube, meaning that people do indeed actively watch our videos on the Nintendo eShop. It is no exaggeration to say that the most preferred viewing option has now become the Nintendo eShop, and it is not uncommon to find that approximately 60 to 70 percent of total views come from the Nintendo eShop.
I see no problem with this in theory, but it will all depend on the execution. If the Nintendo directs prove to be exciting, show surprises and prove a better way to focus on games it will end up being a brilliant move.
what i only can see is the "3ds" lineup. there is no real WiiU lineup.
For the WiiU we only "knew" there are doing something, but i think they aren't ready with many games to show. Sure, we will see Mario Kart and something like Mario 3D. But that's all. I don't think, they will show a Zelda. (maybe a "there's something more...")
And they cannot show Pikmin AGAIN. There's still Wind Waker, but please: We know how the game plays/know the story. It's just a revamp. Everything else i think, is not ready. They are just slow.
No, youtube doesn't count other sites' views, obviously. Plus there are different directs for USA/EU/Japan so that further divides the numbers for each. Not to mention unofficial re-uploads and what not.so looking at nintendo's official youtube page the direct's got about 100-almost 600 thousand views...not sure if this includes people watching it multiple times or not but that seems pretty high.
their e3 direct last year has almost 1million views again not sure if it counts multiple views etc.
that's just on youtube. does this even include their ehop/facebook/ustream viewers as well?
just trying to get more clarification on the direct's viewership
It would if you could read.
I won't watch it. I watched every Nintendo E3 press. Its about the event, experience. Like when people watch world cup in soccer even if they don't care about the soccer for most of the year(s), that makes it special. Personally I don't care about Nintendo, so I won't watch their direct crap.
Apart from these exclusive events for visitors, we are continuing to investigate ways to deliver information about our games directly to our home audience around the time of E3. We will share more information about them once they have officially been decided.
Since when has one of the "big three" (in whatever iteration) NOT given an E3 press conference 8 months after they have released a home console?
For them to ditch a press conference (aimed at thet masses - and not just the press or trade people - we all know that E3 is aimed for the public in terms of exposure) when Nintendo's issues with the Wii U is all about perception and the requirement to raise profile, my thoughts are of one word:
Capitulation.
No, youtube doesn't count other sites' views, obviously.
First of all, it sucks that they won´t be having their usual E3 conference. But, they will be at E3 and reveal games. Don´t get why they divided into smaller events, but I guess we will see.
This is what I read from OP. Nothing about ND. Am I missing something or are we just assuming it will be a Nintendo Direct?
First of all, it sucks that they won´t be having their usual E3 conference. But, they will be at E3 and reveal games. Don´t get why they divided into smaller events, but I guess we will see.
This is what I read from OP. Nothing about ND. Am I missing something or are we just assuming it will be a Nintendo Direct?
On the other hand, since we set out on new endeavors such as Nintendo Direct two years ago in October, we have been paying special attention to the fact that different people demand different types of information from us. For example, as video game fans are looking for information about games, it seems that they are less interested in sales figures that investors and analysts on the other hand attach much greater importance to, and distribution partners are looking for information on how we are going to market our products in the immediate future.
Yeah, they did that, but at least they didn't show their new consoles at Nintendo Direct, wanna know why? Cos nobody would watch that!Btw: PS4 wasn´t revealed at E3, neither will Xbox 720. Did they give up?
Yeah, they did that, but at least they didn't show their new consoles at Nintendo Direct, wanna know why? Cos nobody would watch that!
But how many views do Nintendo directs get? The live streams I've watched have maybe a few thousand viewing - I guess YouTube and other channels like eshop adds a lot more.
But abandoning a big press event seems odd to me. They need to communicate more and show us more, yet they are planning closed events focusing on US releases?
Not having an E3 conference is bad... really bad.
Missed opportunity to say "hey! Look at all the cool shit we've got coming!"
Unless they've got nothing.
Right, because I'm being serious in that a Sony or Microsoft platform wasn't at a Nintendo Direct for that reason...3DS XL is asking you politely to pipe down.
Yeah, they did that, but at least they didn't show their new consoles at Nintendo Direct, wanna know why? Cos nobody would watch that!
So why have you been watching it in the past? Because it's live/audience? Not for the games or hardware?
These just really seem like incredibly asinine reasons to not watch what will probably amount to essentially the same thing minus canned applause.
Some of you guys are acting like E3 is like the Super Bowl or something when it comes to views from non-core fans.
Yeah, they did that, but at least they didn't show their new consoles at Nintendo Direct, wanna know why? Cos nobody would watch that!
If they go strictly with Directs there's potential for them to be used pretty strategically, peppering them out over the course of e3 to counteract Microsoft and Sony hype and keep people talking...hm.
They wouldn't do that anyway, they will announce them for a given time like a normal conference. Likely the same time they will hold the press event.Good luck with that
Yes. Like I said before, do not underestimate the power of a media event.
I never watch football (soccer). I never watch the Premier League, or the UEFA whatevers.
But I always watch the FIFA World Cup. I watch all of the games for the quarterfinals onward and any big games in the pool phases. And so do billions of other people who aren't normally football fans.
Why? Because they know that lots of people will be watching it as well. They know that something big is happening and they want to be a part of it. They know that people will be talking about it and they want to be able to say what they thought about it.
Why do you think Apple hypes up an event for their next phone? Why do protest groups schedule their rallies at the same time as much larger events? Why does Ubisoft make announcements for announcements of the next Assassin's Creed game?
Because it gets people talking. It gets people tweeting. It gets hundreds of replies on GAF threads for things where no details have even been announced!
Marketers can't buy publicity like that. And luckily for them, they don't have to.
You don't seem to be comprehending. They are ditching the format. Not the announcements. They will still very much address the masses through directs, well, directly. They are trying not to dilute the message by aiming at all different segments of the market in one holistic event and instead address each individually.
If you think there is no interest to see Nintendo's foray into hd with some of their 8-digit selling franchises for the first time, sorry to say, but you are a little confused.They have something like five games to show for Wii U, they have no third party support to show, they've already blown their load with 3DS announcements for the financial year and they have no sales figures worth celebrating.
So you're looking at a handful of new games we haven't seen and a load of stuff we've already seen strung out over 90-180 minutes. This is not a good idea.
Nintendo are doing E3 small this year because they have no other choice. This is a corner they have backed themselves into and this is the best way out.
I don't buy the "E3 conferences don't matter!" bullshit because they've mattered enough in the past and I don't buy the "They want to control the message" argument either because if you can't control the message coming from your own pre-planned, scripted stage show then you really have bigger problems with PR and product development than "stage show or YouTube?"
Nintendo are going small because they are now, in the scheme of things, small. Microsoft and Sony will have the weight of their own software and that of every single third party in the world behind them. Nintendo are on their own.
An E3 conference makes no sense for them, not because E3 conferences don't matter or because Nintendo Direct is better, but because it can do nothing but damage them to be compared to their competitors.
3DS XL is asking you politely to pipe down.
They have something like five games to show for Wii U, they have no third party support to show, they've already blown their load with 3DS announcements for the financial year and they have no sales figures worth celebrating.
So you're looking at a handful of new games we haven't seen and a load of stuff we've already seen strung out over 90-180 minutes. This is not a good idea.
Nintendo are doing E3 small this year because they have no other choice. This is a corner they have backed themselves into and this is the best way out.
I don't buy the "E3 conferences don't matter!" bullshit because they've mattered enough in the past and I don't buy the "They want to control the message" argument either because if you can't control the message coming from your own pre-planned, scripted stage show then you really have bigger problems with PR and product development than "stage show or YouTube?"
Nintendo are going small because they are now, in the scheme of things, small. Microsoft and Sony will have the weight of their own software and that of every single third party in the world behind them. Nintendo are on their own.
An E3 conference makes no sense for them, not because E3 conferences don't matter or because Nintendo Direct is better, but because it can do nothing but damage them to be compared to their competitors.
Yes. Like I said before, do not underestimate the power of a media event.
I never watch football (soccer). I never watch the Premier League, or the UEFA whatevers.
But I always watch the FIFA World Cup. I watch all of the games for the quarterfinals onward and any big games in the pool phases. And so do billions of other people who aren't normally football fans.
Why? Because they know that lots of people will be watching it as well. They know that something big is happening and they want to be a part of it. They know that people will be talking about it and they want to be able to say what they thought about it.
Why do you think Apple hypes up an event for their next phone? Why do protest groups schedule their rallies at the same time as much larger events? Why does Ubisoft make announcements for announcements of the next Assassin's Creed game?
Because it gets people talking. It gets people tweeting. It gets hundreds of replies on GAF threads for things where no details have even been announced!
Marketers can't buy publicity like that. And luckily for them, they don't have to.
They have something like five games to show for Wii U, they have no third party support to show, they've already blown their load with 3DS announcements for the financial year and they have no sales figures worth celebrating.
So you're looking at a handful of new games we haven't seen and a load of stuff we've already seen strung out over 90-180 minutes. This is not a good idea.
Nintendo are doing E3 small this year because they have no other choice. This is a corner they have backed themselves into and this is the best way out.
I don't buy the "E3 conferences don't matter!" bullshit because they've mattered enough in the past and I don't buy the "They want to control the message" argument either because if you can't control the message coming from your own pre-planned, scripted stage show then you really have bigger problems with PR and product development than "stage show or YouTube?"
Nintendo are going small because they are now, in the scheme of things, small. Microsoft and Sony will have the weight of their own software and that of every single third party in the world behind them. Nintendo are on their own.
An E3 conference makes no sense for them, not because E3 conferences don't matter or because Nintendo Direct is better, but because it can do nothing but damage them to be compared to their competitors.
Yes. Like I said before, do not underestimate the power of a media event.
I never watch football (soccer). I never watch the Premier League, or the UEFA whatevers.
But I always watch the FIFA World Cup. I watch all of the games for the quarterfinals onward and any big games in the pool phases. And so do billions of other people who aren't normally football fans.
Why? Because they know that lots of people will be watching it as well. They know that something big is happening and they want to be a part of it. They know that people will be talking about it and they want to be able to say what they thought about it.
Why do you think Apple hypes up an event for their next phone? Why do protest groups schedule their rallies at the same time as much larger events? Why does Ubisoft make announcements for announcements of the next Assassin's Creed game?
Because it gets people talking. It gets people tweeting. It gets hundreds of replies on GAF threads for things where no details have even been announced!
Marketers can't buy publicity like that. And luckily for them, they don't have to.
How many who get their information from E3 read every single article and announcement?
The headlines are made on the first day, after the big three do their conference, which is usually streamed to many thousands of people globally. That is the format they have decided to ditch. Why do that when their main issue is getting the word out that the Wii U is a console worth buying, unless they dont have enough to provide that message?
Their keynotes have been shit because they have announced shit at them.
You seemed to miss they will also host an event exclusively for the press. The headlines will derive from that. People globally will watch the direct stream.
Platform unveils would attract more interest even with a normal E3 conference. Still I don't imagine the press will somehow forget to report on the Nintendo press event just as they wouldn't forget a conference.I sincerely hope that you're right. But I feel the combination between the format that Nintendo have ditched and the new platform announcements by Sony and MS will render such headlines away from the front pages, so to speak.
I sincerely hope that you're right. But I feel the combination between the format that Nintendo have ditched and the new platform announcements by Sony and MS will render such headlines away from the front pages, so to speak.