Thurott: $299 version of Xbox v.Next will come with a $15/mo XBLG sub, not $10

What's the difference between this and a person who can't afford it but uses his/her credit card to pay in full?

The person using the credit card is getting screwed over by CC companies with an astronomical finance charge of up to 30%, and still having to pay for Live seperately.

Unless you can pay the thing off in one month you'll be paying more money.
 
I'm really hoping the PS4 has a model that launches at least $450.00. I have no problem going day one at that price. But fuck all of these contracts and monthly fees where you end up paying out the ass over the long haul. I just want to buy it a reasonable price and have it be mine.
 
I can't wait for the inevitable articles of people repoing Xbox 720s. That will be fun.

Paying $500 is the way to go unless you plan on investing the $200 and making 10% off of it each month which is unlikely.
 
i can only speak for the US, but that's only true for new Sprint customers. every US carrier, including Sprint will sell current customers a new handset at full price and not require an annual contract, and all of them but Sprint will do the same for new customers. for some weird reason, if you're a new Sprint customer, even if you pay full price for a handset, you have to enter a 24 month contract. T-Mobile actually switched to a no subsidy model where you get the phone on a seperate 0.0% APR payment plan and can leave at any time as long as you pay the remaining balance on the phone.

That is insane. What's the reasoning/justification for doing such a thing? You've already paid full market price for the phone, what right do they have to lock you into a 24 month contract?
 
Listen, MS understands that any kind of long-term rip-off installment payment plan will sell like gangbusters.

Over the last 30 years, the American middle/lower class has embraced the credit model as their #1 means to keep up with the Joneses and this, combined with video game addiction, will allow MS to rake in the profits and, perhaps, increase their dominance in the American market.

isnt just the american middle lower class....i think that this credit model work in every part of the world...

and honestly i dont see nothing wrong with it..

if u can ...pay it in one time

if u cant :( subsize it
 
This thread is a lesson on why poor people remain poor.

I'd have to say that comparing this to phone contracts doesn't work out well because over the course of the contract you end up paying 2x-3x the price of the phone, not just $40 extra. At least in Canada it does. Yet people keeping paying an extra $40 every month for 3 years to reduce the initial cost by a few hundred dollars.

Does Canada cell phone services actually charge extra $40 for those under contract? lol

In the US, if you don't ever plan on leaving your cell phone service, it's actually cheaper to take advantage of the contract discount price vs buying the phone straight up at an unsubsidized price then paying the same monthly charges for two years.
 
Also, anyone who thinks that Sony won't also offer a similar financing model is a fool. Sorry for being blunt, but it would be monumentally stupid for them not to.

Sony's...gonna be Sony. I hope they do have a model like this and it's as easy to sign up and get, because MS is going to slaughter them at the Poor Folks Gates and that's where a lot of people buy in.
 
I think it's pretty up in the air on whether or not this will work out well for Microsoft.

Yes consumers pay more money all the time to subsidize things like the cost of smartphones.

But this is a video game console. Do you think Jimmy's mom wants to also have to get a contract for his new Xbox? For 'video games'? She didn't want to for the normal 360, because I'm fairly certain the $99 Xbox 360 with contract didn't do well at all. I don't think we ever sold a single one at the GameStop I worked at. No one wanted to be bothered paying a contract for a video game console.

Not to mention all the parents who don't regularly pay for Live. This is $160 more expensive to them.

For the older demographic, I don't think it will make much of a difference. I think most will just get the $500 model. If you have shaky finances and don't want to wait and save up another $200 to get the unsubsidized model, why would you feel more confident in your finances adding another bill on top of all of your other bills every month? Giving yourself another 2 year financial burden? That could potentially compromise your ability to pay other bills, or at least wouldn't be a high priority and you'd end up in trouble for skipping on your M$ payments.

If you can comfortably add $15 a month to your bills, why not just get the $500 model and be smart about it and save the money? In any case, you were buying the system regardless at this point.
 
Oh so now consoles have to be purchased on 2 year subscriptions for the average person to buy them, joy !

Does that 2 years contract include 2 years warranty and breakdown cover .. ? :P
 
Not a big enough premium if I'm Microsoft. Monetizing/securitizing consumer receivables of that tenor (24 months) is so annoying.

They'd have to charge way more to make the discount worth it.

The premium that Microsoft gets is tying people into their ecosystem for two years, just like Google/Apple on phones, and I'll be shocked if the 720's XBLA doesn't crossover somehow with Win8/WP8.
 
Not only not confirmed. It's squarely in wet dream status right now. The BOM for the PS4 is already estimated at around ~$450, and that is assuming they don't include the Eye in every SKU. So, unless Sony want to engage in yet another generation where they lose money for the first year or so it will be more.

Also, anyone who thinks that Sony won't also offer a similar financing model is a fool. Sorry for being blunt, but it would be monumentally stupid for them not to.

Bahaha, did you use newegg prices to calculate that?

There is nooooo way it costs 450 dollars in parts.
 
This whole thing sounds ridiculous but its a good way for MS to advertise a "cheaper" system to people who dont want to drop the 400 or 500 on the unsubsidized model.
 
They must be pretty confident about what's coming with next gen xbox live to be planning pricing like that.



Mind you on the other hand they might just be out to gouge early adopters. They can worry about getting competitive on price in 2014.
 
lol@ People deliberately suggests there will be no subscription model, then compare it to PS3 launch to make Sony product looks so compelling.
 
isnt just the american middle lower class....i think that this credit model work in every part of the world...

and honestly i dont see nothing wrong with it..

if u can ...pay it in one time

if u cant :( subsize it



Yep, nothing wrong with charging the folks that are already struggling financially more for the same thing. What, you're not well off financially? Well then here's your massive interest rate! Enjoy remaining poor sucker.
 
That's not how it works, paying over time = paying slightly more, in everything, sometimes a lot more, moaning about $40 in 2 years is laughable.

No i know how it works. It's not a terrible financing deal. My point was, you're paying more.

And for me? I haven't paid $60 for a live sub since the original Xbox. For me it's more like

$569 ($499 + 2 years at $35) vs $659 ($299 + $15 * 24) .. That isn't a good deal at all. It's almost $100 more to buy it subsidized.


Will people buy this? yes. Is it a good deal? Hell no.
 
They want more software/services/accessories revenue to fill in the the rest of what a potential consumer will buy when getting their new system. When you're only paying a fraction of what it costs upfront, you're likely to be buying more to go with it upfront. Who buys a console by itself when the whole real reason you're looking at the product is to get the software and services that are exclusive to it.

Not sure why there's so much white knight bullshit about this sort of payment option. If people don't like the bottom line when working out what it costs to enter into this kind of contract, they can still use their credit card to do the same. They can still take out a small loan. They can go to a Rent-A-Center or similar. They can still save up. They can also just wait until the price comes down. Lots of options still available. This one is just already popular. But those poor people...oh, they're poor because of this. Hey, let others do what they want since they're responsible for their own finances.
 
Y'know, considering all of the cross gen releases, I'm considering just sticking with current gen gaming for another year.

It's not a matter of I can't pay $450-$500 for a console, but rather I don't want to.
 
That makes a lot more sense since otherwise you would get two years of live for $40, whereas this means you're paying $60 more than you would otherwise.

Or you could get a PS4 and spend the money for XBL on actual games.

Even more than $600, good luck with that.
 
Yep, nothing wrong with charging the folks that are already struggling financially more for the same thing. What, you're not well off financially? Well then here's your massive interest rate! Enjoy remaining poor sucker.

What do you think the alternative is? It isn't the contractor's fault. It's the "poor sucker" who was stupid enough to compromise his financial situation by buying something before he can afford it.

Are Microsoft and other contractors supposed to offer contract deals that are cheaper than paying upfront? That makes zero business sense.
 
Yep, nothing wrong with charging the folks that are already struggling financially more for the same thing. What, you're not well off financially? Well then here's your massive interest rate! Enjoy remaining poor sucker.

But its not a massive interest rate. Its $40 over 2 years. Thats not even signifigant for people on minimum wage.
 
No i know how it works. It's not a terrible financing deal. My point was, you're paying more.

And for me? I haven't paid $60 for a live sub since the original Xbox. For me it's more like

$569 ($499 + 2 years at $35) vs $659 ($299 + $15 * 24) .. That isn't a good deal at all. It's almost $100 more to buy it subsidized.


Will people buy this? yes. Is it a good deal? Hell no.

its a deal coz u will not feel that 15$ ...while theres a big price difference between 499 and 299

here in italy maybe will be 10/12 euro....damn 12 euro r two gin tonic in a bar...no one will FEEL they r paying more...also if at the end they r doing it ........it work ..coz it work like this
 
Not hearing any good news about this upcoming X-Box. No way I want to get locked in like that. I resent signing up to gold to play the odd MP game and then all the hassle to get out of it when I'm done.

It's like every four months you have to buy a game from Microsoft that you don't get.
 
I don't know, I guess I can't get too worked up about this. Assuming I can still get deals on Xbox Live subs, I'd be paying $579 for the console and two years of Live if I paid up front. $660 under the subscription model. Ehhhh. It's not a giant rip off. It's not nearly as bad as the racket cell phone companies have. It's not as bad as like Rent-A-Center. I could probably afford the console on its own but I could see myself doing it just to spread the damage over a couple years, you know, if I felt like buying it.

I guess I can't get outraged about this.
 
I think it's pretty up in the air on whether or not this will work out well for Microsoft.

Yes consumers pay more money all the time to subsidize things like the cost of smartphones.

But this is a video game console. Do you think Jimmy's mom wants to also have to get a contract for his new Xbox? For 'video games'? She didn't want to for the normal 360, because I'm fairly certain the $99 Xbox 360 with contract didn't do well at all. I don't think we ever sold a single one at the GameStop I worked at. No one wanted to be bothered paying a contract for a video game console.

Not to mention all the parents who don't regularly pay for Live. This is $160 more expensive to them.

For the older demographic, I don't think it will make much of a difference. I think most will just get the $500 model. If you have shaky finances and don't want to wait and save up another $200 to get the unsubsidized model, why would you feel more confident in your finances adding another bill on top of all of your other bills every month? Giving yourself another 2 year financial burden? That could potentially compromise your ability to pay other bills, or at least wouldn't be a high priority and you'd end up in trouble for skipping on your M$ payments.

If you can comfortably add $15 a month to your bills, why not just get the $500 model and be smart about it and save the money? In any case, you were buying the system regardless at this point.

if they will do something like this obviously the experiment was a success
 
it'll be like a gentle breeze blowing through your bank account every month...


well ...is something that u choose..........but honestly if in ur bank accout u dont find 15 dollars will be a disaster?

(obv u need to think that xbox user already know that they need to pay for xbl)


ps. anyway ahahahahah was a nice answer :D
 
JxcrtyJ.gif
 
So if the system gets a RROD within a year do you still jeed to finish paying out the rest of the sub? Or is the system covered with a warantee for that lotted time too?
 
Yep, nothing wrong with charging the folks that are already struggling financially more for the same thing. What, you're not well off financially? Well then here's your massive interest rate! Enjoy remaining poor sucker.

It's a $40 difference over 2 years. That means it will cost them an extra $1.67 per month to go this route so please stop being so dramatic. If they want to be smart, they will save their money and buy it in full with no contract and even buy live at the sale prices. Unfortunately most people probably don't do that and Microsoft is taking advantage of it. Not their fault.
 
So if the system gets a RROD within a year do you still jeed to finish paying out the rest of the sub? Or is the system covered with a warantee for that lotted time too?
The current $99 360 deal includes extended warranty for the period of the contract so I assume this would too.
 
Rofl I liked the idea of getting one for €299 and paying €10/month for the next 2 years even if I don't like paying for online, but at €15/month I'd rather buy it at €499.
 
It would amaze me if this caught on anywhere but the US. I mean people bring up mobile phone contracts but Nobody i know would sign up to a 2 year phone contract for a phone that wasnt free or close to free. The only exception is an iPhone at launch but even that gets reduced to free most on most networks after a couple months.


It may drive sales for a short time but most will buy the console outright overseas.
 
Next xbox rumour round up.

-No used games
-Always online required
-causes cancer
-6 months late in software+hardware
-focus on apps
-release in 2014
-But already decied the price and it's $500 or $660 for sub model
-Supports Terrorism
 
My gut reaction was just raw anger but now that I've stepped back, I've realized that this is the most entertaining year in gaming in recent memory. Let the Carnival of Stupid commence.
 
So if the system gets a RROD within a year do you still jeed to finish paying out the rest of the sub? Or is the system covered with a warantee for that lotted time too?
There's a warranty that is part of the current and similar X360 plan. Why would you think it wouldn't come with one?
 
This is actually a really smart move. 15$ a month with live included for a next console at 300$ of the gate?

If it's competing against a 450$ - 500$ console, it's gonna do gangbusters. People underestimating this... man you're not seeing the picture at all.
 
Not really.

Xbox 720 Subsidized: $299 + $15 * 24 = $659
Xbox 720 Unsubsidized: $499 + $60 * 2 = $620

It's a terrible deal.

It doesn't strike me as a terrible deal if the unsub price is as outlined. Paying a little more is really what I would expect, and an extra 40$ over two years is basically nothing.

Sony would be pretty crazy not to offer something similar.
 
Top Bottom