BigJonsson
Member
My only question is... why crack? Dude's rich. Crack was made so poor people could afford drugs.
When it comes to Rob Ford you really can just ask, "Why anything?"
My only question is... why crack? Dude's rich. Crack was made so poor people could afford drugs.
Well, maybe the fact that Rob Ford is in a photo with a dude that was murdered makes more sense now
![]()
Now this is me speculating but maybe that guy was found dead sans phone, and the crackhead who murdered him got that photo off the phone along with the video
That's actually not a bad theory
This story is getting good enough to be a full season of The Wire...
Is the Kickstarter for the video hitting its 200k goal soon? This whole thing just disgusts me. Makes Toronto the laughing stalk city of the world. This is worst than the SARS scare years ago.
Word in the Toronto OT is that multiple copies of the video now exist, and the Star is in negotiations for one of them right now.
Word in the Toronto OT is that multiple copies of the video now exist, and the Star is in negotiations for one of them right now.
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEES
This morning on the radio a Toronto Star reporter (Doolittle ? ) claimed that there are at least three copies of the video. The Star is still in negociations for a copy. Plus she said there are other stories in the works. There's more to come.
Word in the Toronto OT is that multiple copies of the video now exist, and the Star is in negotiations for one of them right now.
Rob Ford's press secretary and deputy press secretary just quit
They don't want to go down with the ship either. This way it'll be much easier for them to find other jobs.And their reasoning is "principal". Basically, they just couldn't work for him anymore.
The Star has been working on something 'big' regarding Ford for the last few months, bigger than just this crack thing. Considering their relationship with Ford, I can only assume it's bad stuff... not that Ford is secretly a genius or anything.
We've all heard similar drivel from The Star before.
We've all heard similar drivel from The Star before.
Have we? I didn't realize I was supposed to not trust the Star. Is there good reason for this attitude?
Since when did the word drivel become a synonym for "truth"?
Since when did the word drivel become a synonym for "truth"?
Still waiting on this mythical video.
We've all heard similar drivel from The Star before.
Still waiting on this mythical video.
Despite all that's happened in the past week, you don't think the video exists? Really?
I don't think it exists, that's what I'm getting at. Everyone seems to take what The Star writes as truth. I will be shocked if we ever see the video, so for them to now apparently claim there are multiple copies of the video is asinine.
Post one story about Ford that the Star published that has proven to be false.
It wasn't as though the Star said "we have this video in our hands, and we're going to to share it sometime in the future" - they basically said "Yeah, we've seen this video Gawker is talking about, and we're trying to get it".
With your feelings for the star, I don't know if you'd change your opinion even if they did provide the video.
That's because none of us have any reason to suspect the paper is lying.
Well am I wrong? You seem hell bent on discrediting the Star, but for tenuous reasons. Like they talk about seeing a video, but don't have the video to back up their statements.Reminds me of Toronto-GAF after the Conflict of Interest case resolution earlier this year.
The video has never been proven true or false. That's the problem.
I would LOVE to see the video released just to see the ensuing shit storm that follows. I would also love to hear Bill Carol defend this on 640 am as he seems to take the view that Ford is innocent.
so how many toronto gaffers are card-carrying members of the rob ford defense force?
Well am I wrong? You seem hell bent on discrediting the Star, but for tenuous reasons. Like they talk about seeing a video, but don't have the video to back up their statements.
This happens all the time in journalism, where people see things happen but aren't able to provide photographic evidence for the occurrence, so while we can't, shouldn't and don't take their word as unshakeable fact, we do also understand that this is just the nature of reporting. Something you seem to have issue with specifically in this instance. I can't help but feel that your particular political leanings (or whatever it is that makes you defend Ford) has more to do with your issues with the Star than any 'wrong doing' on their part.
It's a digital video. What's so hard to believe about extra copies?I don't think it exists, that's what I'm getting at. Everyone seems to take what The Star writes as truth. I will be shocked if we ever see the video, so for them to now apparently claim there are multiple copies of the video is asinine.
I like Rob Ford and always thought he got picked on unfairly ... by the star and most city councillors in particular. Rob represented everything the left loathes and to see him get into office was a massive blow to their collective ego's. It tickled me to see somebody like Rob in office after David Miller whom I despised.
With that said I've seen enough "Rob" pictures floating around the internet to be reserved at this point in my support. All I can say is that I hope it's not true, but things are looking rather grim.
It's a shame really, as Rob was the first real ray of conservative light we've had in a mayor in years.
I like Rob Ford and always thought he got picked on unfairly ... by the star and most city councillors in particular. Rob represented everything the left loathes and to see him voted into office by the public was a massive blow to their collective ego's. It tickled me to see somebody like Rob in office after David Miller whom I despised.
With that said I've seen enough "Rob" pictures floating around the internet to be reserved at this point in my support. All I can say is that I hope it's not true, but things are looking rather grim.
It's a shame really, as Rob was the first real ray of conservative light we've had in a mayor in years.
And The Star would not risk their reputation on it if they even had the slightest inkling it was false.
And I don't even care if Ford smokes crack or not. It's just that he's a fucking rich kid moron.
The link you just posted in Toronto-GAF (Star overdid ‘Somali’ references in first report of drug dealers peddling Rob Ford crack video: Public Editor) is exactly what I am getting at here. They are in the business to sell newspapers and generate web traffic, not always to get the facts.
And to be clear, Ford is beyond defending at this point. If the video is factual, then he deserves what he gets. But until the truth is revealed, I don't see the value in destroying someone's image (even more than he already has) based on what a news source claims.
It's a digital video. What's so hard to believe about extra copies?
Have we? I didn't realize I was supposed to not trust the Star. Is there good reason for this attitude?
Well am I wrong? You seem hell bent on discrediting the Star, but for tenuous reasons. Like they talk about seeing a video, but don't have the video to back up their statements.