The point is that being at increased risk still means it is not your fault if people assault you.
I think the real moral of the story is don't fucking rape people, and don't blame a person that gets raped for being raped.
The point is that being at increased risk still means it is not your fault if people assault you.
but to even say that is a perpetuation of rape culturesociety should place the onus on the rapist not to rape, not on the victim to avoid being raped.
to even question if it was "fair" that someone was raped? that's fucked up.
You can point out that being at increased risk is stupid and still put full blame on the people who assaulted you. You can have it both ways.
I think the real moral of the story is don't fucking rape people, and don't blame a person that gets raped for being raped.
And that says it much more elequently than I could.The 2nd part of the quote is when she says the girl was lucky to only be raped (as though drinking with athletes usually gets you raped and murdered) and randomly questions whether she was a virgin. The whole thing is stupid.
This isn't the scorpion and the frog here. It isn't inherently the nature of athletes to rape and murder, and anyone hanging out with athletes better not drink, even if there is pressure to do so, because by their nature they will rape. It's the human and the human. A human drinking with another human, with the understanding that one human will not rape and/or murder the other.
Another reason victim blaming is so dumb is... where does it start? When she drank, or when she went to the party? If we want to help prevent rape, first we need to focus on the rapists. But yes, precaution is another good idea. So is "don't drink" the precaution you want to go with? Or are you being dishonest, and if she had been raped at the party anyway without drinking, you would have said "shouldn't have gone to such a party where the guys would be drinking." She could have been easily overpowered regardless. Telling girls they are stupid won't help them prevent rape. Making them feel "shit, I'm dumb for even coming to this party, I guess this is my fault" won't give them the confidence to overcome pressure.
I think the real moral of the story is font fucking rape people.
There's also the commonly used "Faux pas"congratulations, pinky toe!
edit: to clarify, I pretty obviously meant "here, on this specific messageboard."
Unless there's a FrenchGAF I'm not aware of.
The problem is that this wont help you against a rapist. Not saying that this means that every woman should have a gun in her pocket and that she is to blame if she doesn't, just saying that it's a dangerous world.Our default expectation should be that people act like decent human beings. Nothing else.
Any other expectation or defense is victim blaming.
I disagree with your logic. That's the same as saying you shouldn't drive defensively. The only way to prevent accidents is to have less drunk drivers. The truth is you should make sound decisions and there should be less rapists.More like it doesn't do any good to solve the problem of said risk by pointing it out. We can talk all we want, over and over, about all the decisions she made that eventually led to her rape but time spent on discussing that is time that is not spent on discussing why people rape others and how to stop it. The solution to stopping rape is less rapists. Any other talk regarding how women should change their behavior to avoid rape is just spinning our tires.
The question is - what's the point of MAKING that point?
What possible benefit is to be gained by putting forth the stance that allows in any way for the rape of another human being to be "understandable?"
I asked this question in the most recent thread about the anti-rape ads from Europe, and never got an answer, instead people spiraled down the rabbit hole of increasingly tinier analogous justifications until it became this granular THING...
But really, what is to be gained from finding out people are discussing something like what happened in Steubenville, and trying to shove a foot in that closing door and saying "well, now wait a minute - lets look at this from the side of the people sexually assaulting an unconscious woman..."
Which is typically where the analogies come into play, because you can't just say "Let's look at this from the side of the rapists" without probably being instantly dismissed. So you have to use an analogy.
This isn't the scorpion and the frog here. It isn't inherently the nature of athletes to rape and murder, and anyone hanging out with athletes better not drink, even if there is pressure to do so, because by their nature they will rape. It's the human and the human. A human drinking with another human, with the understanding that one human will not rape and/or murder the other.
I disagree with your logic. That's the same as saying you shouldn't drive defensively. The only way to prevent accidents is to have less drunk drivers. The truth is you should make sound decisions and there should be less rapists.
My question is "why"? as in why did her PR people let a RS reporter have such unfettered access to Serena. NOTHING good is going to come from that situation.
Such a busted analogy. Accidents are also caused by... accidents. Rapes don't happen accidently. Nobody trips and lands with their dick in a girl by mistake.
I disagree with your logic. That's the same as saying you shouldn't drive defensively. The only way to prevent accidents is to have less drunk drivers. The truth is there should be less rapists.
People are taking this "victim blaming" blaming way too far.
Yeah, a victim can't even make a poor decision now. If you point out anything you are automatically blaming them.
I think the real moral of the story is don't fucking rape people, and don't blame a person that gets raped for being raped.
Yeah, a victim can't even make a poor decision now. If you point out anything you are automatically blaming them.
Such a busted analogy. Accidents are also caused by... accidents. Rapes don't happen accidently. Nobody trips and lands with their dick in a girl by mistake.
Nobody characterizes a drunk driver as an "accident." It's a crime.
I guess you didn't see the part where I said drunk drivers...
The post I quoted said the only way to reduce car accidents was by reducing drunk drivers. It is a busted analogy.
I guess you didn't see the part where you said the only way to reduce accidents was to reduce drunk drivers.
Serena Williams said:Do you think it was fair, what they got? They did something stupid, but I don't know.
It was obvious what he was talking about.
It was obvious what he was talking about.
He doesn't understand how analogies work.
"Obviously I don't know, maybe she wasn't a virgin"
Raping non-virgins is not the same as raping virgins. Thanks Serena.
Yeah, a victim can't even make a poor decision now. If you point out anything you are automatically blaming them.
And if the words that follow only make sense in terms of assigning blame, then that is what she is doing. Taken in light of these words coming alongside Serena questioning whether the rapists deserved so harh a punishment, I see no other rational way to interpret her.
Yeah, a bad analogy. If he said the only way to reduce drink driving accidents is to reduce drink driving he may have had something.
The problem with GAF is that people think the world revolves around right and wrong, it doesn't. Should a woman be able to walk around half naked drunk anywhere she wants? Yes. She should have to freedom to do and dress however she wants in an ideal world. But it in the REAL world there are precautions she should take to lessen the chance of something unfortunate happening (ie not wandering around drunk and half naked on a dark street). I am not blaming the victim or condoning rape at all, just try to make smart decisions.How is 'Well, if you hadn't gotten drunk...' not blaming the victim?
Yeah, she mentions her opinion might be different if the guys slipped something into her drink, but it absolutely wouldn't have been. People continually move the goalposts in arguments like these. If she didn't want to be date raped she shouldn't have been drinking with strangers. If she didn't want to be raped in her own home she should have had a stronger lock and worn less revealing pajamas, etc, etc. It never ends.Or are you being dishonest, and if she had been raped at the party anyway without drinking, you would have said "shouldn't have gone to such a party where the guys would be drinking."
Again, he misspoke (-typed), but it was exceedingly obvious what he meant. You're doing nothing but quibbling over the way it was presented.
It all depends. There's welcoming an assault and then there's being smart about a situation.
I'm not blaming the girl. I'm just saying she could've easily avoided this if she were smart (not something teenagers are, I know). But I liken it to walking in Compton in the middle of the night holding out an iPad and wearing noise-canceling headphones. You don't do that because you know you're welcoming the attention and you can't blame others for you being oblivious to where you are.
Sure, we all wish we lived in an ideal world where people wouldn't hurt each other but we don't. People are disposed to take advantage of others and people need to be taught to avoid those types of situations.
The guys involved in the rape deserved their punishment to the T, but I'm not giving a free pass to a girl either who could've easily stayed away from these types and maybe went to see a movie or whatever.
They don't need you to point out that they made a mistake. I'm sure they have plenty to deal with already, regret included.
They gain nothing from it, the only person that benefits is you and your own sense of superiority.
The problem with GAF is that people think the world revolves around right and wrong, it doesn't. Should a woman be able to walk around half naked drunk anywhere she wants? Yes. She should have to freedom to do and dress however she wants in an ideal world. But it in the REAL world there are precautions she should take to lessen the chance of something unfortunate happening (ie not wandering around drunk and half naked on a dark street). I am not blaming the victim or condoning rape at all, just try to make smart decisions.
As a black man there are precautions I have to take in my day to day life that people of other races don't. Is it fair? No, but that's the society we live in. Should people just not be racist? Sure but this isn't the perfect ideal world.
Serena's dead sister should have known better than to be hanging out in Compton.
Rape is a particularly sensitive topic to be discussing whether or not the victim had undermined themselves in anyway prior to the actual incident. But this "blame" narrative isn't unique to rape but in fact rather common. For example, if you park a Porsche in a very poor area with high crime rates, and then have that Porsche damaged or burgled, at some point you will be asked why you parked it there. Or, say you had an expensive watch mugged off you - you'll be asked why you wore it in such and such place. The intent isn't to hold you responsible for what happened but rather understand whether or not you drew attention to yourself, and thus the wrong attracted the wrong group.
I think this is where the whole "she was asking for it" narrative originates from. I don't believe those who look at it from Serena's perspective are suggesting women are asking to be violated by e.g. wearing provocative clothing, but rather whether or not they drew the wrong kind of crowd. Of course, in the grand scheme of things, taking a e.g. drink from a stranger at a bar doesn't quantify you as being deserving of nefarious treatment; it doesn't really matter. But, you will see ads reminding women to specifically not do that. You will see ads to not walk home alone at night. You will see ads reminding you not to take out your smartphone in crowded areas. You will see ads for items to hide things inside of your car.
The [rhetorical] question Serena Williams is offering therefore isn't "did she deserve it?" but rather "did she make a mistake at some point that night for those to take advantage of?". It's a question set out from a desire to trying to understand how exactly something could have happened - how to make sense of it. It isn't set out from an ideological viewpoint that women should hide themselves at home, for example. The idea that a victim did something which, in hindsight, wasn't a good idea as well having the misfortune of having to come across the perpetrators is an idea that will make sense to most people generally speaking. That doesn't of course mean that even in their eyes there would be an equivalency of blame.
The problem with GAF is that people think the world revolves around right and wrong, it doesn't. Should a woman be able to walk around half naked drunk anywhere she wants? Yes. She should have to freedom to do and dress however she wants in an ideal world. But it in the REAL world there are precautions she should take to lessen the chance of something unfortunate happening (ie not wandering around drunk and half naked on a dark street). I am not blaming the victim or condoning rape at all, just try to make smart decisions.
As a black man there are precautions I have to take in my day to day life that people of other races don't. Is it fair? No, but that's the society we live in. Should people just not be racist? Sure but this isn't the perfect ideal world.
naturals law
I will tell my daughter about this case. I will tell her she should never be drunk like that.
If at some point in the future she is drunk and is raped I will put all of the blame on the rapist. Does that make me a rape apologist?
This guy gets it.The problem with GAF is that people think the world revolves around right and wrong, it doesn't. Should a woman be able to walk around half naked drunk anywhere she wants? Yes. She should have to freedom to do and dress however she wants in an ideal world. But it in the REAL world there are precautions she should take to lessen the chance of something unfortunate happening (ie not wandering around drunk and half naked on a dark street). I am not blaming the victim or condoning rape at all, just try to make smart decisions.
As a black man there are precautions I have to take in my day to day life that people of other races don't. Is it fair? No, but that's the society we live in. Should people just not be racist? Sure but this isn't the perfect ideal world.
I will tell my daughter about this case. I will tell her she should never be drunk like that.
If at some point in the future she is drunk and is raped I will put all of the blame on the rapist. Does that make me a rape apologist?
The words are messed up. What she said has problems with it. But if I'm reading between the lines, I don't think she's trying to say that the girl was to blame for what happened to her.