I don"t know what games you're playing but I can list a fuckton of gorgeous console games that play wonderfully.
TRUTHFACT: MS having eSRAM yield problems on Xbox One
- Thread starter chubigans
- Start date
- Status
Or don't. The game will make you awesome either way.
Pretty sure Peter Moore said it was all on PC.
Funny you mentioned that. That was the first game confirmed to be running on a pc.
PopcornMegaphone
Banned
Great contribution.
Confirmed to be running on PC, Try harder.
Yes.
Templar_Dante
Banned
Say what??! That looks like crap.
SenjutsuSage
Banned
Not sure what people are saying, but aside from Ryse not having the best gameplay demo, the game, visually, looked damn impressive. And from learning more about the combat, there's definitely more there than meets the eye.
I was among those that expected Ryse to be the Xbox One's Lair, but I saw a game that, even with its imperfect demonstration, looked quite a bit better than I was expecting. First things first, those prompts can be turned off and aren't actually QTE. There's more of a combat system there than people are giving it credit for and it seems to flow better than people think. Oh well, not too important I guess, but Ryse sure as hell doesn't have weak visuals.
I was among those that expected Ryse to be the Xbox One's Lair, but I saw a game that, even with its imperfect demonstration, looked quite a bit better than I was expecting. First things first, those prompts can be turned off and aren't actually QTE. There's more of a combat system there than people are giving it credit for and it seems to flow better than people think. Oh well, not too important I guess, but Ryse sure as hell doesn't have weak visuals.
Alx
Member
Didn't Digital Foundry explicitly state which game ran on which hardware at E3, at least for those they tried ?
If I remember correctly :
- "Xbox1 hardware" : Ryse, Forza, Killer Instinct, FIFA
- "Xbox1 devkit" : Project Spark
- "PC debugging environment" : Dead Rising 3, Crimson Dragon
- "PC representative of Xbox specs" : Battlefield 4
Marty Chinn
Member
Monty Mole
Member
It's a last-gen port. Basically Kameo for the new generation.
Templar_Dante
Banned
Which is totally a representative of the console!
Garrett 2U
Member
He is talking about the demo during the Xbox conference.
GoofsterStud
Member
But Xbox has the CloudZ!
SRTtoZ
Member
Is it me or does the guy from Ryse look EXACTLY like Psycho from Crysis 3? Put a helmet on him and thats the same exact face.
And so are we.
And so are we.
It was a single player demo that was being showed off for the xbox one wasn't it
Wickerbasket
Member
Games have to look like shit to have good gameplay. Didn't you get the memo?
http://www.pcgamesn.com/battlefield/battlefield-4-e3-footage-all-running-pc
Here's what it was running on:
SenjutsuSage
Banned
People are talking about pcs, but did anyone ever consider that maybe the in-game assets and graphics settings were exactly as what is tested and working on Xbox One hardware, making the pc hardware that's running the demo not so important?
If the Xbox One can run it at the same quality and performance, does it truly matter?
If the Xbox One can run it at the same quality and performance, does it truly matter?
Templar_Dante
Banned
Dual Cloud SLi crossfire!
http://www.pcgamesn.com/battlefield/battlefield-4-e3-footage-all-running-pc
Here's what it was running on:
Im 100% a console gamer (apart from playing Planetside 2 on my humble i5/HD6770). . . but I have to say, I would like to have that!
Also, do not be fooled, people. Everyone played BF4 multiplayer with Xbone controllers too, or EA+MS unprecedented partnership. Great advertising. But those werent dev kits at all. Why have two 7970s just to "lock it" at 1.2TFlops for the Xbone demo?
NingenJanai
Member
http://www.pcgamesn.com/battlefield/battlefield-4-e3-footage-all-running-pc
Here's what it was running on:
I find it really hard to believe that the Xbox One will be remotely as powerful as that.
SRTtoZ
Member
It wont be. Neither console will be. 100% confirmed.
I'm not sure that AMD built 64 $4000 PCs for E3 so that it could run the game at console quality
Link said:
Holy crap I'm going to buy a Xbox One just so I can rip out those two 7970s and build a new PC.
Um that was for the GDC demo which ran close to 4K if i'm not mistaken.
SRTtoZ
Member
People are going to be VERY disappointed when they boot up BF4 for the first time on the XB1 and hope to see E3 quality running @ 60 FPS.
Are you reading these links AT ALL? They all state it was running on that at E3.
Wasnt the GDC demo running on a 7990?
Are you reading these links AT ALL? They all state it was running on that at E3.
Wasnt the GDC demo running on a 7990?
Alx
Member
I suppose they had different setups... or the EA reps just lied to them. But it could explain why they thought the short single player demo they saw was less impressive than the building scene in multiplayer.
just found the page again :
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-hands-on-with-xbox-one
Everything Battlefield at E3 was on these. Those pics were from E3.El_Chino said:
That goes for a lot of what was shown... and it isn't exclusive to one console or another.
Thanks. When people specifically mentioned multiplayer I was wondering if they had a different setup for the Angry Sea demohttp://www.pcgamesn.com/battlefield/battlefield-4-e3-footage-all-running-pc
Here's what it was running on:
soulassssns
Banned
Is this still TRUTHFACT?
SRTtoZ
Member
I actually agree with that. Anything that was running on system (PS4/XB1) will look the same but anything that was running on 'specd PC's' will not hold up visually.
Same when you heard something like "in engine" - be weary of a lot of the E3 claims. Like I said, it's not exclusive to one company or another. Tempered expectations are best course during E3.
Apologies, long night but either way the resolutions might have played a big role into why they're running on those cards.
Wickerbasket
Member
Yeah, everything from E3 needs to be taken with a huge grain of salt.
SRTtoZ
Member
Possibly, I just don't expect the same level of visual fidelity on these next gen consoles at release. Maybe they'll surprise me?
Chance Hale
Member
Are there any actual 1080P shots of Ryse? I think it looks good to great, certainly not terribad outside of the screenshot with what I assume to be the smoke causing the background to alias. If nothing else I trust in Crytek to deliver a great technical experience.
The armor in particular is just wonderful, great textures and lighting.
The armor in particular is just wonderful, great textures and lighting.
dragonelite
Member
Gamersyde has them.
Edit: Never mind they are 1440p but doesn't looks like they are bullshot with loads of AA
They even have some bugs in them if you look well.
It's all about that AMD optimization!
Templar_Dante
Banned
Lets say little prayer that MS isnt really downclocking the GPU of Xbone either then....
Chance Hale
Member
Of course, those wonderful bastards. How do they get such high quality screenshots and 60 FPS video by the way? Do they just request them where no one else does?
Edit: Ah well, will be closer in representation than those tiny 720P shots. Just wanted to have a look.
SRTtoZ
Member
I'm not an Xbone fan but I dont think they are. I think they have yield issues but thats really the only rumor that has any legs. They had games like Forza 5 and Ryse running on actual consoles so we can probably expect that type of performance.
The real way to find out will be when release hits and we start getting comparisons for Watch_Dogs and BF4. Thats going to be an exciting ass day.
dragonelite
Member
Yeah they do freaking rock.
I think the rest just cheaps out and downsample shit.
My guess is the ps4 will get 2~4MSAA while X1 will get post processing AA the Esram should help in that aspect really well.
GribbleGrunger
Dreams in Digital
dragonelite
Member
Got the shader count and it matches VGLeaks so i expect the clock would also match.
- Status