Why does fixing TACs not count as something that affects balance when it changes a fundamental mechanic and subsequently dishes out advantages and disadvantages to characters that can get more and less out of that mechanic?Yes and no. It's the most balanced version of SF4 but since they are also adding new characters it doesn't hurt to tweak the existing characters a bit. Also unblockables are a bitch.
When I cock an eyebrow at a Marvel patch, I'm assuming it's one that doesn't also add new characters and is just tweaks to existing characters. Stuff like fixing TAC doesn't count as a balance patch to me.
Capcom: "Give us feedback on UMvC3."
Fans: "Okay!"
Angry People on the Internet: "What are you giving them feedback for?"
Capcom: "Give us feedback on UMvC3."
Fans: "Okay!"
Angry People on the Internet: "What are you giving them feedback for?"
Sp00ky not streaming tonight? He said yesterday he would.
Why does fixing TACs not count as something that affects balance when it changes a fundamental mechanic and subsequently dishes out advantages and disadvantages to characters that can get more and less out of that mechanic?
Sp00ky not streaming tonight? He said yesterday he would.
Why does fixing TACs not count as something that affects balance when it changes a fundamental mechanic and subsequently dishes out advantages and disadvantages to characters that can get more and less out of that mechanic?
idk did AE2012 need a balance update?
I'm not asking as a counterpoint, I'm asking cause I don't know
Where does Floe rank on the cute boys list??
He's probably S tier, along with Marn.
Capcom: "Give us feedback on UMvC3."
Fans: "Okay!"
Angry People on the Internet: "What are you giving them feedback for?"
Patch talk has been going on way before feedback was asked for. You guys came prematurely.
Yeah was on arts twitter.Sp00ky needed some rest, apparently?
From EventHubs via the grapevine:
Yeah, I don't get it
Fans: "Okay here you go!"
I gotta agree with David in that I hope the current top tiers don't get nerfed too bad. It would be lame if they are.From EventHubs via the grapevine:
Too true.All that changed is Ono. Ono.
All that changed is Ono. Ono.
Capcom: "Give us feedback on UMvC3."
Fans: "Okay!"
Angry People on the Internet: "What are you giving them feedback for?"
"After watching [Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3] at Evo this year," Ono said through a translator, "we [see that we] do have things here and there that could be balanced better." Ono added that "in terms of content, we don't really have any ideas about how to make the game better," but asked fans to discuss the changes they'd like to see.
"Maybe we can make something happen," he said. "Maybe."
From EventHubs via the grapevine:
Arcade licensing revenue leads to different decision trees for SF4.idk did AE2012 need a balance update?
I'm not asking as a counterpoint, I'm asking cause I don't know
Derp.Except Capcom never asked for feedback on UMvC3. Read again what Ono had said:
"After watching [Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3] at Evo this year," Ono said through a translator, "we [see that we] do have things here and there that could be balanced better." Ono added that "in terms of content, we don't really have any ideas about how to make the game better," but asked fans to discuss the changes they'd like to see.
"Maybe we can make something happen," he said. "Maybe."