• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Breaking Bad - Season 5, Part 2 - The Final Eight Episodes - Sundays on AMC

Status
Not open for further replies.
Creating the gambling story for Walt (thus giving him a way to actually spend his money)

Buying the car wash for the purpose of laundering money

Rescuing Ted from his audit with the IRS

Right, she isn't proactive or clever at all.

Again, she only did those things because Walt (and Ted) were being careless idiots. Thinking she was being an "annoyance" for trying to provide cover stories for their behavior is like the a little kid getting annoyed his mom is nagging him.

- The gambling was just a way for her to have a hold over Walt. Do you really think he cared about stories to spend his money?

- She didn't need to get involved in that at all. I can't feel sorry for her since it was her idea all along. Saul and Walt were going to launder anyway before she even got involved

- Rescuing Ted? You mean forced him against his will, right? After she already cooked his books

And the whole reason he started cooking again in S5 was because she gave away all of Walt's money. She can't get away scot free over here.

And that's not including volunteering Walt to pay Hank's bills without his notice, again

She's been a thorn since the beginning
 
Her only purpose is to foil Walt in some capacity.

There is nothing else to her character. She's not funny, interesting or fascinating. There is nothing to her character, except to be an annoyance.

Characters like Gus are Walt terrible people. Far worse than Skyler, but they're great characters, with layers of substance to them.
Yup!

Skyler is as compelling as a cardboard box and about as dynamic as a rock. The fact that her one redeeming quality is that she is the least morally bankrupt character in the show speaks volumes about her lack of complexity and substance.

She is literally a human MacGuffin.
 
No, no... I agree with you. I'm just saying, in terms of acting, she hasn't convinced me that things have gotten any worse. It's not so much a problem with the character as much as it is the limits of the actor.
Uh, the the end of Crawl Space and the Pool scene demonstrated it pretty damn well for me.
 
No, no... I agree with you. I'm just saying, in terms of acting, she hasn't convinced me that things have gotten any worse. It's not so much a problem with the character as much as it is the limits of the actor.

I agree she's not always on her best game, but she has handed down some phenomenal performances. Just this past season, her breathless, fear-dripped performance opposite Bryan Cranston as he stomps after her around the room and demands she tell him what her exit strategy is was absolutely brilliant. I've never seen a more authentic scene of domestic abuse.

Nameless said:
Creators can be wrong about their characters and you're entitled to your opinion but Vince disagrees.

I wonder which came first - the blog post from the Breaking Bad crew which specifically references Walt as a sociopath, or Vince Gilligan saying that that MIGHT - might - be too strong a word?
 
Did anyone else here cringe when listening to Walt lie to Skyler about the second cell phone in season 2?

god, its so awkward when he tells her that what she heard was his phone alarm, to remind him to take his medication, and its obvious that he's lying. That scene always made me feel uncomfortable.
 
Why would anyone root for an evil villain in a fictional story? Especially when this villain is cast in the leading role as an antihero? Are you completely new to fiction or what?



Oh, I see there's only one correct way to view and interpret this show! I didn't realize that things were so simple, but thanks for letting us all know! You hear that, guys? We haven't been watching the show correctly! What we SHOULD be doing is rooting for Skylar!



Right, just like how Jar Jar Binks was a good guy character who cared about the other protagonists and always fought on the side of the good guys! There's no reason NOT to like him, so if anybody happened not to... they must have been watching the movie incorrectly as well!

I should've expected this.

There is a difference between caring about and being interested in/fascinated by a main character. To boil the show do to "he's the main character, we have you root for his interests" is not only wrong, but proves that maybe you're the one who is new to fiction. Walt is the unreliable narrator placed on the TV screen. We don't need to care about him or wish him to succeed to be fascinated by the web of lies that he has engrossed his entire world in. The story that Gilligan is interested in telling is more about the root of evil than rooting for Walt. That's why the show is so engrossing.

Also, comparing Skyler to Jar Jar Binks is beyond stupid, even if you meant it as a point that we don't need to sympathize with "good" characters. That's such a surface level reading of Skyler's plight that I'm not sure how to respond.
 
This post is a pretty great prototype of how and why the Skyler haters are wrong about everything.

The key to unraveling the argument is that you define what she does as existing to be an 'annoyance.' It is not an 'annoyance' to tell your spouse to stop cooking meth. It is not an 'annoyance' to be angry or in shock when you find out your spouse killed. It is not an 'annoyance' to mull over whether to turn this guy in to the authorities. It is not an 'annoyance' to do what it takes to preserve your family, as the monster in the living continually consumes all the air until you can barely stand the breathe anymore. Skyler is a housewife, she married Walt like that, and her dreams of her 2.5 kids and her little house were thought to be shared by her husband. She has watched, piece by piece, as this man she thought she knew spun out of control until he is barely recognizable, a messy streak on a foggy mirror. She watched as he manipulated her son, so that he would blame her for the turmoil in the family. She knew that Holly is in for the exact same fate as she looked on in horror and sees Walt and Holly and Jr. watching Scarface together. And when it came to it, she compromised her own moral standing in order to try to take a chance at keeping the family together in some way and not ruin Walt Jr. and Holly's perception of their father.

Skyler represents as a character exactly what type of toll Walt takes on everyone that ever loved him. She represents the moral decay that merely being around Walt guarantees. She represents the desperation of every trapped house wife in an abusive relationship, who insanely tries to do anything to protect the shattered remains of her family until it's too late to realize there's no going back. She is a fantastic character, effectively performed by Anna Gunn, and she has perfectly fit into the show as the contextual weight highlighting the monster in her kitchen.

An excellent post. The show has come to be about how Walt's cancer has become moral and externalized, breaking down and decaying everyone he loves. Skyler is a clear example, but every character, in their own way, has "broke bad" because of what Walt brought in to their lives, compromised their moral integrity as a direct result of his selfish decisions.

Skyler used what little power she had. So yes in literal terms she was an "annoyance". Where she had been placed by Walt she could be nothing more, but she can't be blamed for still trying to exercise her autonomy and break out of the cage this man had created for her, subtly, insidiously and without her knowledge or consent.
 
Uh, the the end of Crawl Space and the Pool scene demonstrated it pretty damn well for me.

I'm rewatching now in prep for the new episodes; I'm closing in on season 3. Since I'll be watching the new episodes on Amazon, I figure I'll go on blackout this evening.

I definitely remember her in Crawl Space and, though it's less in my mind, the Pool scene. Based on my recollection, I would agree, in those two episodes, you're correct.
 
I wonder which came first - the blog post from the Breaking Bad crew which specifically references Walt as a sociopath, or Vince Gilligan saying that that MIGHT - might - be too strong a word?

People building shallow views of a nuanced and complex characters, probably. And we both know Vince said a lot more than that.
 
Every person I know that watches the show in real life hates her. Including my wife. This place is the only side I've seen that has ardent fans

#TeamSkySkyDieDie

Maybe Walt will cut her head off, put it on a stick, light it on fire, and let Ricky Hitler take pot shots at it with his pistol.
 
ah you know it's the latest Breaking Bad topic when Pez posts his latest insane theory about how a main character most be rooted for simply because he is the main character and how Vince Gilligan the showrunner is wrong about everything he has written because Pez doesn't like to hear the truth

You have been watching the show wrong. Deal.with.it. Just something you gotta deal with

What the fuck are you talking about? If anything, I was pointing out how ridiculous it is for anyone to say that everyone "should" be rooting for any particular character. It's just as ridiculous to actually, sincerely say that I'm "watching the show wrong". Lol. I guess I don't have a high enough horse to watch it on.
 
What the fuck are you talking about? If anything, I was pointing out how ridiculous it is for anyone to say that everyone "should" be rooting for any particular character. It's just as ridiculous to actually, sincerely say that I'm "watching the show wrong". Lol. I guess I don't have a high enough horse to watch it on.

You're watching the show wrong!!! Let me show you the way. GAf always amazes me.
 
People building shallow views of a nuanced and complex characters, probably. And we both know Vince said a lot more than that.

A sociopath is not 'shallow.' There are real sociopaths in the world and these can be every bit of complex as someone who just makes a bad choice. Given how little regard we've seen Walt have for anyone, and we will continue to see, he's been faking every shred of empathy he ever had. Like a true sociopath.

What the fuck are you talking about? If anything, I was pointing out how ridiculous it is for anyone to say that everyone "should" be rooting for any particular character. It's just as ridiculous to actually, sincerely say that I'm "watching the show wrong". Lol. I guess I don't have a high enough horse to watch it on.

It's not like we don't go down this path every Breaking Bad topic. You post your latest insane theory that does not even tangentially relate to what is actually going on in an episode, and the rest of everyone laughs about it. That's just the roles we play.

I wouldn't say you were watching the show wrong if I hadn't had like 2 seasons of reading your posts to know it's true. I've never seen someone more insanely misinterpret a piece of fiction than you, genuinely. Admittedly my life experience is limited, but so far, you're the winner :P
 
To boil the show do to "he's the main character, we have you root for his interests" is not only wrong, but proves that maybe you're the one who is new to fiction.

Except that's not what I said at all, I was simply pointing out why it was understandable that some people could find him to be the best part of the show.

You are the one who can't seem to accept that anybody could have any opinion other than rooting for Skylar.

When you Skylar enthusiasts are literally too dense to be able to parse my argument, then there is really no point in continuing this stupid debate.

You post your latest insane theory that does not even tangentially relate to what is actually going on, and the rest of everyone laughs about it.

This sounds a lot like someone I know. ;)
 
You're watching the show wrong!!! Let me show you the way. GAf always amazes me.

My initial point that I don't understand the vicious hatred for Skyler and the gymnastics that people go through to justify Walt and/or paint Skyler as a poorly drawn annoyance. The shows POV seems very clear in sympatheszing with Skyler over Walt. I don't understand those who believes she has deserved to end up in a plastic drum.
 
- The gambling was just a way for her to have a hold over Walt. Do you really think he cared about stories to spend his money?
I have no idea how you can think Skylar had selfish motivations about that. What did she stand to gain personally from the cover story? She never wanted to spend any of the money even after it was established. Do you really think an unemployed school teacher suddenly throwing down stacks of thousand dollars on conspicuous purchases is responsible behavior?

- She didn't need to get involved in that at all. I can't feel sorry for her since it was her idea all along. Saul and Walt were going to launder anyway before she even got involved
Nevertheless, it's direct counter-evidence that Skylar exists solely to get in the way of Walt. That was her directly enabling him in a much smarter way than either Walt or Saul would have figured out.

- Rescuing Ted? You mean forced him against his will, right? After she already cooked his books
She only forced him because she knew that IRS attention would bring their whole family down. Yes, she shares part of the blame for cooking the books initially, but Ted had no way to get out of the audit, so Skylar was forced to take charge and give him a way out. Not her fault he was too stupid to take it.

There's a rather bizarre undercurrent here of blaming Skylar for "forcing" irresponsible and reckless characters to do things they should be smart enough to do anyway.

And the whole reason he started cooking again in S5 was because she gave away all of Walt's money. She can't get away scot free over here.
Again, no one is claiming she's a paragon of morality. But almost all of her actions you call "annoying" are justifiable as wanting to avoid attracting law enforcement attention, which is, you know, what a smart criminal mind would do. Walt owes his continued safety from the police more to her than he would ever admit.

Unrelated note: Watching a Travel Channel show about BBQ restaurants, apparently there's a place in Memphis called Gus's Fried Chicken.
 
- Rescuing Ted? You mean forced him against his will, right? After she already cooked his books

You do remember why she forced Ted to clear his name right? If the IRS went down on Ted, they'd look into everyone connected to him and look at Skyler and discover Walt's "tax evasion".

She rescued Ted to protect her family. Some of that reasoning was definitely because she felt for Ted but most of her motivation and the fuel for her persistence and anger against what Ted was doing was to keep her family safe. If Ted went down, her, her family, and Walt and everyone he is connected to would go down.
 
She's the most sympathetic character on the show and by far one of the most interesting to watch over 5 seasons. She in no way serves only as a roadblock or a foil for Walt. I don't even know how to respond to that because it's just not the case.



Cranston has done a beautiful job with that.

I have a new theory about Skyler hate.

In a show focused primarily on plot, her role is much more about character (her own, and Walt's change around her/relating to her). So if you really aren't interested in the psychology, half the Skyler scenes are unnecessary.

I watch the show for the characters as much as plot, so Skyler is a great aspect of the show for me.
 
I have a new theory about Skyler hate.

In a show focused primarily on plot, her role is much more about character (her own, and Walt's change around her/relating to her). So if you really aren't interested in the psychology, half the Skyler scenes are unnecessary.

I watch the show for the characters as much as plot, so Skyler is a great aspect of the show for me.

Explains all the "Fly" hate, too. The character moments in "Fly" are fantastic and it was definitely a great episode from Season 3.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom