Dunkin’ Donuts criticized for ‘bizarre and racist’ ad campaign in Thailand

Status
Not open for further replies.
Eh. This stuff is super culture specific. I personally think it's harmless as an ad in Thailand.

Well yea, thats why its in Thailand. Its 'safe' there.

But if you're up on game, you know full well that her lips didnt need to be pink. Considering, the insides of that donut are not pink.

An American version of the ad wouldnt have a white woman with pink lips. You would never let the executives get away with it. The black struggle in Thailand isnt what it is in America, so its easy to dismiss.

lol at 'culture speciifc'. No kidding, racism is racism.
 
I'll just say that an American global company knows the history behind blackface and that it would be better to try and reduce the acceptance of such an image by not using it as a marketing trick. Regardless of intent or the prevalence of black people in a location media is a powerful tool that shapes the way we think, it would be better if Dunkin' Donuts didn't continue to 'normalize' this image especially given the trend towards globalization.
 
Someone explain this to me. Red/pink lipstick is far and away the most popular colour is it not?

It looks like they're using to express the lips/smile.

Suuuure, red may be popular ... but once you start painting people colors you're out-side of what's "normal" and are clearly going for "artistic looking stuff".

Plus the image we have of black face comes with the characterized big red lips. That;s why I said that any other color and I wouldn't have had a 2nd thought ... I mean, fuck, white would have worked just as well for a contrast if not better.

But like I said, w/e ... Asian places are strange with this kinda stuff and I'm sure no one over there is outraged. I'm not gonna pretend to know the logic behind this ad (personally, I would have made her look like see was dripping in beautiful black chocolate ... or used a very dark skinned black female. But w/e, I didn't get payed to make it so they can do what they want)
 
I'll just say that an American global company knows the history behind blackface and that it would be better to try and reduce the acceptance of such an image by not using it as a marketing trick. Regardless of intent or the prevalence of black people in a location media is a powerful tool that shapes the way we think, it would be better if Dunkin' Donuts didn't continue to 'normalize' this image especially given the trend towards globalization.

It appears to be an autonomous branch with its own CEO and product line.
 
Well yea, thats why its in Thailand. Its 'safe' there.

But if you're up on game, you know full well that her lips didnt need to be pink. Considering, the insides of that donut are not pink.

But we move forward...

You're basically saying they WANTED to be racist are trying to be sneaky by advertising in Thailand.

This kind of thing seems like some sort of racism pareidolia... where people see racist things where none actually exist.
 
It's okay guys, only Americans can ever be racist. Stop projecting your American racism onto the pristine racially-conscious culture of foreign countries. Also please completely ignore that Dunkin Donuts is an American corporation.
 
I'll just say that an American global company knows the history behind blackface and that it would be better to try and reduce the acceptance of such an image by not using it as a marketing trick. Regardless of intent or the prevalence of black people in a location media is a powerful tool that shapes the way we think, it would be better if Dunkin' Donuts didn't continue to 'normalize' this image especially given the trend towards globalization.

That's the thing. Yes this can shape the way we think but this doesn't really make you THINK anything. It has no racial undertones, no subtle hint at the black being inferior. Nothing. It's just an image that just happens to be tied to something sensitive in america.

I'd argue that this:

xC7eyur.jpg

Is much different than something like this:


The second image definitely stopped me in my tracks when I first saw it because it has some emotional weight. There's something to react to. The doughnut ad says precisely nothing. It's 100% about doughnuts. Even out of context it's still about doughnuts. The Sony ad out of context is much MUCH different.
 
You're basically saying they WANTED to be racist are trying to be sneaky by advertising in Thailand.

This kind of thing seems like some sort of racism pareidolia... where people see racist things where none actually exist.

Well yea. /shrugg

Plenty of racist and sensational ads throughout history. Add this to the list.
 
Well yea. /shrugg

Plenty of racist and sensational ads throughout history. Add this to the list.

But by claiming that everything is racist, it lessens the seriousness of *ACTUAL* racism.

It's all turning into the boy who cried wolf. Keep calling everything racist and soon no one will care when real racism crops up.
 
But by claiming that everything is racist, it lessens the seriousness of *ACTUAL* racism.

It's all turning into the boy who cried wolf. Keep calling everything racist and soon no one will care when real racism crops up.

I didnt claim everything is racist. I just pointed out what I viewed as something that didnt need to be expressed the way it was.

At the bold. Well, that's what they want. But people will continue to speak up when necessary.
 
"Blackface" is mostly unheard of in Asia (and honestly most of Europe too), I don't think this ad had any negative connotation or is racist.

Will it be perceived as such in the US? Of course, cultural differences.
 
But by claiming that everything is racist, it lessens the seriousness of *ACTUAL* racism.

It's all turning into the boy who cried wolf. Keep calling everything racist and soon no one will care when real racism crops up.

It's not like everything is the same degree of racism.

This isn't like calling a black person a "n*****" or anything like that but it's still a little bit racist and draws on racist stereotypes. It's probably not malicious but you don't have to be malicious to hurt someone.

"Blackface" is mostly unheard of in Asia (and honestly most of Europe too), I don't think this ad had any negative connotation or is racist.

Will it be perceived as such in the US? Of course, cultural differences.

squaretomsawyer.jpg
 
But by claiming that everything is racist, it lessens the seriousness of *ACTUAL* racism.

It's all turning into the boy who cried wolf. Keep calling everything racist and soon no one will care when real racism crops up.

This is one of the problems explored in Richard Thompson Ford's The Race Card: How Bluffing About Bias Makes Race Relations Worse.

Highly recommended.
 
"Blackface" is mostly unheard of in Asia (and honestly most of Europe too), I don't think this ad had any negative connotation or is racist.

Will it be perceived as such in the US? Of course, cultural differences.

'Black is still good' is kinda racist in of its self.

Its a strange world we live in, man.
 
It's not like everything is the same degree of racism.

This isn't like calling a black person a "n*****" or anything like that but it's still a little bit racist and draws on racist stereotypes. It's probably not malicious but you don't have to be malicious to hurt someone.
How is this drawing on racist stereotypes? The woman is ethnically ambiguous, there's a clear link from Charcoal color (and coal mining) and she's done up like a fashion editorial. She's there to be admired in spite of her completely unnatural coloration.
 
It's not like everything is the same degree of racism.

This isn't like calling a black person a "n*****" or anything like that but it's still a little bit racist and draws on racist stereotypes. It's probably not malicious but you don't have to be malicious to hurt someone.

For that to be true, you have to prove intent.

What is more likely here?

They painted her black to match the black donut in order to sell said donut

or

They painted her black to draw on racist imagery from the other side of the world that practically no one in Thailand would get... ...to sell donuts
 
How is this drawing on racist stereotypes? The woman is ethnically ambiguous, there's a clear link from Charcoal color (and coal mining) and she's done up like a fashion editorial. She's there to be admired in spite of her completely unnatural coloration.

Well...
 
How is this drawing on racist stereotypes? The woman is ethnically ambiguous, there's a clear link from Charcoal color (and coal mining) and she's done up like a fashion editorial. She's there to be admired in spite of her completely unnatural coloration.

Sheesh...
 
How is this drawing on racist stereotypes? The woman is ethnically ambiguous, there's a clear link from Charcoal color (and coal mining) and she's done up like a fashion editorial. She's there to be admired in spite of her completely unnatural coloration.

oh boy
 
The second image definitely stopped me in my tracks when I first saw it because it has some emotional weight. There's something to react to. The doughnut ad says precisely nothing. It's 100% about doughnuts. Even out of context it's still about doughnuts. The Sony ad out of context is much MUCH different.

Ehhh, I disagree.

The 2nd, to me, is just a highly "fashion/ artistic" looking depiction of 2 contrasting colors or forces. Just so happens that they went for "Back and White" ... which is what we call these 2 ethnic groups for some dumb fuck reason. So they played off of that.

There's a series of these ads, with the black woman having the upper hand and so on.
They merely did it to excite interest and get attention by playing on racial themes that are deep inside of us all.

This ad ... just looks strange to me. But w/e, like I said, Asian places are strange when it comes to this.
 
Yeah - not seeing the racism here. Bizarre for sure though.

How is this drawing on racist stereotypes? The woman is ethnically ambiguous, there's a clear link from Charcoal color (and coal mining) and she's done up like a fashion editorial. She's there to be admired in spite of her completely unnatural coloration.

Hmm - there are people that have that colouration naturally, so...you might want to check yourself.
 
Well she's cute, and damn I want a chocolate doughnut right about now.

I'm not convinced that's actually chocolate. Can anybody read Thai for a description of the donut? Google translate is not very effective. The reviews I've found of the one mixed with chilis don't mention anything about chocolate.
 
I'm not convinced that's actually chocolate. Can anybody read Thai for a description of the donut? Google translate is not very effective. The reviews I've found of the one mixed with chilis don't mention anything about chocolate.

It's literally a donut made with edible charcoal.
 
The lips are pink and matching the logo so the ad is mostly a bichromatic design. What other color should they use? Blue? Green?

IMO there's not a negative intention behind this design.
 
Ehhh, I disagree.

The 2nd, to me, is just a highly "fashion/ artistic" looking depiction of 2 contrasting colors or forces. Just so happens that they went for "Back and White" ... which is what we call these 2 ethnic groups for some dumb fuck reason. So they played off of that.

There's a series of these ads, with the black woman having the upper hand and so on.
They merely did it to excite interest and get attention by playing on racial themes that are deep inside of us all.

This ad ... just looks strange to me. But w/e, like I said, Asian places are strange when it comes to this.

You're telling me that the second image which has a clear depiction of dominance, a clear image of inferiority (whether it's this version or the reverse) has less racial impact that a picture of a women in black face holding a doughnut?

C'mon...
 
Dude just said black isnt natural.

NO NO ITS OKAY. WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE AD. WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE AD!!!!!!!!!!!

People don't think before they type. Ad executives don't think before they sign contracts.
 
I'm not convinced that's actually chocolate. Can anybody read Thai for a description of the donut? Google translate is not very effective. The reviews I've found of the one mixed with chilis don't mention anything about chocolate.

Basically it's a donut mixed with charcoal, it's also boasting something like "Charcoal in food, that's how ancient emperor like it. Eat like the emperor"
 
Dude just said black isnt natural.

NO NO ITS OKAY. WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE AD. WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE AD!!!!!!!!!!!

People don't think before they type. Ad executives don't think before they sign contracts.

What in the actual fuck.

Hey! Look! This is also something that has an unnaturally black skin:


Clearly racist.
 
Dude just said black isnt natural.

NO NO ITS OKAY. WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE AD. WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE AD!!!!!!!!!!!

People don't think before they type. Ad executives don't think before they sign contracts.

Ahem.

But by claiming that everything is racist, it lessens the seriousness of *ACTUAL* racism.

It's all turning into the boy who cried wolf. Keep calling everything racist and soon no one will care when real racism crops up.

You're right about one thing though;

People don't think before they type.
 
Dude just said black isnt natural.

NO NO ITS OKAY. WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE AD. WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE AD!!!!!!!!!!!

People don't think before they type. Ad executives don't think before they sign contracts.

He was clearly talking about how it was unnatural for a Thai woman to have pitch black skin. You are being incredibly obtuse about this.
 
Stutte, its not that you don't get it. You refuse to look at it from a different perspective.

The black apple is pointless. Has no form in what we are talking about.

Its about imagery of black individuals. The ad could be taken the wrong way. Due to them being all the way in Thailand, they felt it was ok to sign off on.

Americans can still see what is happening in Thailand, if you put it on a worldly view. lol.

I don't think its a good ad, given the context of Blackface.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom