Oh, good grief. Give people some credit, man. This an extreme edge case. Very extreme.Most people won't bother to sell the device they found out was the wrong one and then buy the right one. They'll just chalk it up to a bad experience and dock Sony's rep.
PS4 only has one touch area so its not a total solution sadly.
I will be sad if the dual touch mechanics are thrown under the bus for future vita titles.
If a DS3 was a complete solution, i would love this idea.
For the time being. It's expected that pairing a PS4 controller with it will fix that, or expect patches.
Most people won't bother to sell the device they found out was the wrong one and then buy the right one. They'll just chalk it up to a bad experience and dock Sony's rep.
It's already there on PS3 games.
I feel like I've posted this many times but games like Black ops are rendered at the Vita's native screen resolution.
Also it outputs in 480p,720p and 1080i
Think about all the people who will have a PS4. Chances are, if you have a PS4 you will be paying for PS+. Consider how many Vita games are made available each month on he service. Consider how this interacts with the PS4, allowing you to basically connect it to any TV in your home relatively hassle-free. How compact it is and easy to bring with you to a friend's house, hotel, vacation, etc. It only costs $100. If you have a PS4, buying this seems like a no-brainer.
It does everything a Vita does but on a TV, so yeah. That and it also remote plays PS4 games.Pardon the ignorance of this question, but this thing is essentially a Vita, a PSP, and a PSOne (via PSN classics) all in one? With full screen support?
I don't see the appeal of playing Vita games on TV, but I can just plug it in to my PC monitor, right? If that means I have a Vita for $100 I'm in.
They really should have made a dedicated controller for this.
If their blu ray players are anything to go buy. This will have terrible MKV support and annoying Cinavia DRM.
It does everything a Vita does but on a TV, so yeah. That and it also remote plays PS4 games.
Probably would've driven costs up, and this thing needs to be cheap as chips to appeal.They really should have made a dedicated controller for this.
They really should have made a dedicated controller for this.
Pardon the ignorance of this question, but this thing is essentially a Vita, a PSP, and a PSOne (via PSN classics) all in one? With full screen support?
Why bother?
The more stuff that transfers between the Vita, PS3, and PS4, the more cross-promotion there is between the consoles and Sony systems.
Probably would've driven costs up, and this thing needs to be cheap as chips to appeal.
Because it becomes a hassle for people having to wonder whether or not they can play a specific Vita game.
So,
- Can I stream from my smartphone/tablet to the TV using this? Like Airplay?
- Can I use the PS4 controller?
- Why is this only limited to 2 controllers? I want to play 4-player Crash Team Racing or Crash Bash (PS1).
Because it becomes a hassle for people having to wonder whether or not they can play a specific Vita game.
Agreed. If they made a Vita 3D Blu ray player for $130ish I'd be all over that.That is annoying but it's better to just buy the Blu-ray movie. Most of the time you can get the 3D bluray, regular bluray, the dvd, and a digital version all for $20-25 o Amazon.
I'm sure they will package it with a PS4 controller and work out the patches three months in. Only struggle will be the back touch
I wonder if Vita developers will start to have options for HDTV's? Like 720p mode if using Vita TV with reduced IQ or native Vita resolution with the best IQ.
As it was already stated, the Vita has 2 touch panels (screen and back panel). The other problem is that the PS4 controller has a touchpad, not a screen: aiming for something on a separate screen through a touchpad is going to be very difficult.
R3/L3 for touch screen
touchpad for back touch panel
Problem solved
This looks awesome.
Just wondering why Sony isn't using the DS4 to allow play of touchscreen VITA games?
But 100$? SIgn me up!