jediyoshi
Member
selling it on steam does not equal running on steambox.
Not that your original comment was pointing out the distinction, given their direction with SteamPlay, they're essentially one in the same.
selling it on steam does not equal running on steambox.
So a PC.
This is an option. The other is another option. What is wrong with options?????
so you are saying that Valve expects that PC gaming accessibility will take a leap back 20 years?? What trend or hint of anything like that have we seen??That's what they're banking on. Not so much now, but in the future as games become increasingly focused on user created content, player-developer interactions, rapid patching, and (they're predicting) Microsoft becomes a larger and larger impediment to these things. I can't see a Steambox as something they're hoping to overthrow the market right now, but they must be thinking that PCs are going to become less and less developer and gamer friendly and that they're putting themselves in a position to capitalize on that when it happens.
O+O
Modular controller maybe?
You can thank Apple for that (and maybe Xbox Live a little). It's all walled garden and proprietary product talk at Microsoft nowadays because Apple has become so successful with it. The PC is becoming a much better platform because of the Internet, not because of Microsoft. If anything, they're heading in the other direction and if they could have it their way, they'd get a cut out of everything that's making the PC a better platform.so you are saying that Valve expects that PC gaming accessibility will take a leap back 20 years?? What trend or hint of anything like that have we seen??
Last time I checked I didn't need to edit my autoexec.bat to make a game run. If anything games are becoming easier and easier to develop for and to support in the PC.
Screw Valve for being a private company. I want to get rich too.
Windows cost money and is not tailored to games like SteamOS will be. Windows has a lot of overhead that is not necessary for a dedicated gaming machine.Nothing at all. But I just don't see the time and effort spent on this being a worthwhile investment.
I've thought about this and I don't see this being super successful, unless I'm missing something. So I need a high-end gaming PC and then another box that's capable of running SteamOS? It just seems like a lot of hassle to run Steam on your TV. Why not just plug your PC into your TV and just run Big Picture mode?
Really confused about the level of excitement about this announcement. Honest questions: if you're already in the Steam ecosystem, don't you already have a gaming rig? Why get excited for a version of big picture mode than removes compatibility with 99% of your existing Steam Library?
Or you just install SteamOS on a PC designed for gaming that's dedicated to your living room and you're good to go.
Really confused about the level of excitement about this announcement. Honest questions: if you're already in the Steam ecosystem, don't you already have a gaming rig? Why get excited for a version of big picture mode than removes compatibility with 99% of your existing Steam Library?
Gaben is taking us out if the gaming ghetto and into the promised land.
Really confused about the level of excitement about this announcement. Honest questions: if you're already in the Steam ecosystem, don't you already have a gaming rig? Why get excited for a version of big picture mode than removes compatibility with 99% of your existing Steam Library?
Really confused about the level of excitement about this announcement. Honest questions: if you're already in the Steam ecosystem, don't you already have a gaming rig? Why get excited for a version of big picture mode than removes compatibility with 99% of your existing Steam Library?
Well, it is. Anything pushing Linux, rock-solid, open source free OS, while making it more streamlined and efficient for gaming is mighty welcome in my book.I feel like this is a good thing for the future of PC gaming.
It's not even close to be "99% of the Steam library" and it will eventually shrink a lot if enough developers support it.Really confused about the level of excitement about this announcement. Honest questions: if you're already in the Steam ecosystem, don't you already have a gaming rig? Why get excited for a version of big picture mode than removes compatibility with 99% of your existing Steam Library?
People who are already heavily invested in the Steam ecosystem and build their own computers will have little interest in the Steambox. We are just not the target demographic, they are looking to expand their market to other people.
We will have an interest in the cheaper streaming Steambox, the controller, and the dualbooting the OS though.
By and large, this week isn't really for us.
So will I be able to play Team Fortress 2 on my monitor while my wife plays scribblenauts on the TV all from one Steam account?
what about origin etc?
Not at the same time.
yea valve has gotten lazy and has not done anything for the steam client in years. The client needs a massive overhaul and they are just sitting there resting on their laurels.
So no new Half-Life or Portal?
How disappointing. Why should I care about an OS
Windows cost money and is not tailored to games like SteamOS will be. Windows has a lot of overhead that is not necessary for a dedicated gaming machine.
Gaben is taking us out if the gaming ghetto and into the promised land.
You can thank Apple for that (and maybe Xbox Live a little). It's all walled garden and proprietary product talk at Microsoft nowadays because Apple has become so successful with it. The PC is becoming a much better platform because of the Internet, not because of Microsoft. If anything, they're heading in the other direction and if they could have it their way, they'd get a cut out of everything that's making the PC a better platform.
Watch Gabe's talk from Linuxcon last week if you want to hear it from his mouth. It's only 20 minutes and overall a very good speech.
This isn't intended to be a direct transition of people transferring over from desktop gaming. This has more to do with taping into the market of people who get their entertainment from the living room TV . A lot of the actual excitement is them laying the groundwork for a migration away from Microsoft/Windows reliance.
Steam OS is really interesting, but I just wonder what kind of market penetration it will get. The main hurdle is converting all those people who already have a gaming pc with steam, which is basically most of the pc market right now.
But this doesn't make much sense to me because that market already has a Roku or Apple TV device for their entertainment needs. If they are really gamers and want to play in their living rooms then they probably have a console also.
Gotta be fair though - Windows PC became so good because of Microsoft and their decisions in past 15 years.
Maybe they have some idiots running the place these days but that doesnt change the above.
Uh, I guess if you like "indie" games then yeah, sure. It's amazing.
But I don't.
Gotta be fair though - Windows PC became so good because of Microsoft and their decisions in past 15 years.
Maybe they have some idiots running the place these days but that doesnt change the above.
Consolidating devices and open platforms are always nice.
True, but the SteamOS by itself can't do this. You need a box powerful enough to run those games natively.
Uh, I guess if you like "indie" games then yeah, sure. It's amazing.
But I don't.
But this doesn't make much sense to me because that market already has a Roku or Apple TV device for their entertainment needs. If they are really gamers and want to play in their living rooms then they probably have a console also.
I've thought about this and I don't see this being super successful, unless I'm missing something. So I need a high-end gaming PC and then another box that's capable of running SteamOS? It just seems like a lot of hassle to run Steam on your TV. Why not just plug your PC into your TV and just run Big Picture mode?
Which decisions? In the gaming space, at least. I'm not trying to be argumentative, I'm legitimately curious.Gotta be fair though - Windows PC became so good because of Microsoft and their decisions in past 15 years.
Maybe they have some idiots running the place these days but that doesnt change the above.
holy shit really? Do you even know how we got games to run 15-20 years ago??Please explain. From what I remember MS did all they could to make the life of a PC gamer more difficult, from tying DirectX version to OS versions, making time exclusive deals to keep games away from PC, stopped publishing their main games on PC, killed PC exclusive studios like Ensemble, released windows 8, made a pathetic pushed for GFWL, didn't allow for xbox kinect to connect to PC (unless you paid for a more expensive device), etc.
The one good thing they did for PC was the xbox controller, but I bet that was mostly unintended.
Doesn't really make much sense without a Steambox. If you're a gamer who wants to hook up your PC to your TV, you've already done it.
The streaming is nice though.