Impeccable
Member
NeoGAF will die forever when it is revealed that the living room box turns out to be the Playstation 4.
I just want a good PC controller with NO LIGHTS!!
Yes, because it would create a paradox and the universe would end...NeoGAF will die forever when it is revealed that the living room box turns out to be the Playstation 4.
NeoGAF will die forever when it is revealed that the living room box turns out to be the Wii U.
give me a no bullshit box
a comfy controller
and good devs/pubs support.
then we can talk prices.
Fixed that for you. The megaton to end all megatons. Iwata comes out with Gabe and simply says "Sorry for the firmware update delay, but we figured out a unified account system. To explain it, here's Gabe Newell."
This strikes me as about as reasonable as some dream alliance with Sony. As far as I can tell, people are just taking their favored system and dreaming about how amazingly super awesome it would be if [Microsoft/Nintendo/Sony] teamed up with Valve and created their personal dream super box, without any consideration for the underlying economics or logistics.
People keep mentioning having to build a secondary powerful pc to play games.
Doesn't the streaming option eliminate the need for second powerful pc? Can a little box be built for cheap to stream from my main system? Roku style
People keep mentioning having to build a secondary powerful pc to play games.
Doesn't the streaming option eliminate the need for second powerful pc? Can a little box be built for cheap to stream from my main system? Roku style
Yes, because it would create a paradox and the universe would end...
The whole idea is so stupid that it's not even worth entertaining the thought. What's the point? Valve gets 30%. Sony gets 30%. Neither company would give up their share, and they have absolutely no reason to share their revenue with the other. And pubs and developers certainly aren't interested in handing over 60% of their revenue to make both Sony and Valve happy.
The SteamOS announcement is cool and all and i am excited but i dont want to have to purchase another device to use this SteamOS. Maybe I have it all wrong IDK. I was hoping to triple boot this OS with UBUNTU and Win7. I really hope they go this route.
People keep mentioning having to build a secondary powerful pc to play games.
Doesn't the streaming option eliminate the need for second powerful pc? Can a little box be built for cheap to stream from my main system? Roku style
True but the goal for Valve is to progressively get rid of that massive computer in your backroom. As time passes and more AAA games are released multiOS, you will have less and less incentive to keep that beast running in the background. But you will need to upgrade your SteamBox for that.
So when is the next reveal?
Today?
The SteamOS announcement is cool and all and i am excited but i dont want to have to purchase another device to use this SteamOS. Maybe I have it all wrong IDK. I was hoping to triple boot this OS with UBUNTU and Win7. I really hope they go this route.
Gabe Newell has previously spoken about a $99 box that will do this. I vaguely remember him saying that, at some point in the future, he wanted the dumb terminal hardware (i.e. a box that just receives streamed video from a more powerful PC somewhere else in the house) to be so cheap that they could give it away for free.Yeah but why cant they have some little device that hooks into the hdmi port on your tv that streams from your pc to the tv?
It is primarily designed to be like Android for living room PC hardware manufacturers, i.e. Valve provides the software and leaves it up to everyone else to sell hardware that has Steam built in.
Nothing there, however, precludes the end-user from building their own box and installing SteamOS to it, or dual/multi booting it with other operating systems on their current PC. Take in mind, however, that the OS is designed for the living room so expect a 10 ft UI. No one knows for sure if there will also be a "desktop mode" for it, if that's your preferred way to play.
Gabe Newell has previously spoken about a $99 box that will do this. I vaguely remember him saying that, at some point in the future, he wanted the "dumb terminal" hardware to be so cheap that they could give it away for free.
The problem with this is that a steam box isn't going to be any less expensive than a PC (ignoring cost of OS). Not to mention a steam box will have much less utility for that price.
If you can't afford a PC, you're not going to be able to afford a steam box either.
Has it already been floated out there that this hardware announcement may be some kind of Vita TV like device? The wording on the description for Steam OS seems pretty clear that it can do that.
"You can play all your Windows and Mac games on your SteamOS machine, too. Just turn on your existing computer and run Steam as you always have - then your SteamOS machine can stream those games over your home network straight to your TV!"
So, they would need some kind of hardware to accept that signal from your PC, right?
I dont mind running all my games in the SteamOS as matter of fact I think its about time pc gaming gets its own OS just for gaming. If Steam makes it where a pretty good amount of my library is available through the OS with the obvious promise of more to come Im sold and will exclusively use the OS for what is intended. Of course like you mention its great to have options and not forced to choose
I'm fairly certain there was a "Steambox" thing being shown a few months ago or so that was basically a streaming box. I think most people assume that there will be multiple Steamboxes and on the low end it will basically be just for streaming while the high end options should be quite a bit more powerful.Has it already been floated out there that this hardware announcement may be some kind of Vita TV like device? The wording on the description for Steam OS seems pretty clear that it can do that.
"You can play all your Windows and Mac games on your SteamOS machine, too. Just turn on your existing computer and run Steam as you always have - then your SteamOS machine can stream those games over your home network straight to your TV!"
So, they would need some kind of hardware to accept that signal from your PC, right?
What information are you basing this off of?
How much longer until the announcement?
How much longer until the announcement?
If there's really a "Steambox" coming, I wonder what the final name will be. Everyone assumes it's going to be called "Steambox" but that's just the common name that people on the Internet have standardized on for referring to its concept. It may actually be called that, but maybe Valve will surprise us.
I hope the final name is different too. Steambox is meh.
I hope the final name is different too. Steambox is meh.
lol, if that's the name Valve can just take my money now.Gabe Cube is the official GAF pick it would seem.
I hope the final name is different too. Steambox is meh.
No one really knows but the issue I see here is standardization. You know a console will always be able to play any game made for it and it is optimized. Having multiple steam box configurations presents the same issue as regular PC gaming. You can get whatever the basic model is but in two years it's going to be left behind.
Call it the Boiler or the Steam Turbine. Actually, those are really bad names.