At least it supports 1920x1080.
Yeah, I'm looking at you, Enslaved.
Enslaved was easy to fix though, a few seconds editing a .ini.
At least it supports 1920x1080.
Yeah, I'm looking at you, Enslaved.
What is your definition of "many"? Steam hardware survey shows 2.5% people using 1920x1200, and around 1.1% for any other resolution higher than 1920x1200.to be honest, 1080 is old news. It maybe a new and exciting thing for next gen consoles, but many pc gamers are used to higher resolutions, up to 3 monitors and stuff like that.
Yeah sure.
![]()
Finished building it today, $18,000 machine.
i7-4960X, 64GB DDR3 2400Mhz RAM, 4 x GTX780 Ti's, 4 x 512GB Samsung 840 EVOs in RAID, 4 x 3TB HDD, etc etc...
My home PC is more than capable(i7-3930k, 2 x MSI Lighting GTX680s) but hopefully there will be a mod in the future to make 4K doable.
All the people wanking over this (and I'm a PC only gamer) seem to have missed the point that it would have been better to spend less and upgrade more regularly. Same power but much cheaper and less chance of hardware failure. Hardware depreciates too fast.
Also, $18000? Itemise that for us.
You must understand that I reside in Australia so prices are jacked up. Parts all up, including the $4000+ monitor he purchased(Dell UP3214Q), Cyborg RAT9, STRIKE7 Keyboard, ASUS Xonar Sound Card, Win 8.1 Pro, Case etc etc equaled to roughly ~15-16k. He literally purchased the best that money could buy, aside from a proper liquid cooling system and other tidbits.
Oh and we have a similar configuration as a display system, albeit it's running an i7-4770k and only two 840 EVOs in RAID. Still beast!
All the people wanking over this (and I'm a PC only gamer) seem to have missed the point that it would have been better to spend less and upgrade more regularly. Same power but much cheaper and less chance of hardware failure. Hardware depreciates too fast.
Also, $18000? Itemise that for us.
A PC port is now shit if it doesn't allow for resolutions above 1080p? That's new.
Hyperbole is fun.
Who cares about minorities?1.37% of 65M Steam users having higher res than 1080/1200p is 890,500 people. Close to a million people. That's indeed not a small number.
Gotta realize that 'price is no object' consumers generally aren't worried about best value.All the people wanking over this (and I'm a PC only gamer) seem to have missed the point that it would have been better to spend less and upgrade more regularly. Same power but much cheaper and less chance of hardware failure. Hardware depreciates too fast.
Also, $18000? Itemise that for us.
1080p is a pretty good resolution...
for my cellphone.
yes...we judge these games by the criteria of frame rate, resolution, gunplay, and number of dungeons.
Welcome to NeoGAF!
All the people wanking over this (and I'm a PC only gamer) seem to have missed the point that it would have been better to spend less and upgrade more regularly. Same power but much cheaper and less chance of hardware failure. Hardware depreciates too fast.
Also, $18000? Itemise that for us.
It's funny cause it's true.1080p is a pretty good resolution...
for my cellphone.
1.37% of 65M Steam users having higher res than 1080/1200p is 890,500 people. Close to a million people. That's indeed not a small number.
In this thread: people complaining about nothing.
"Wow. 1080p max resolution? such sadness. my monitor am cry."
I doubt anyone can even notice a difference between 1080p and 1440 while the game is in motion.
Be glad you have a gaming pc! Some of us are stuck with peasant consoles!
Yep, and if you take out the percentage of Steam users who have a steam account to play peggle or some shit on their laptop gpu, that percentage goes up quite a bit, as people with these screens tend to be more enthusiast level gamers.
I am quite curious about those who are decrying the backlash against the indignation about no higher than 1080p support.
This game has been out for the PS3 and the 360. Let's say that all who are anticipating this for the PC do not own either of the console versions of the game. It would then be safe to assume that these people, who are playing the game the first time, want the best version of the game on PC; they are expecting the usual improvements and most commonly, for PC gaming, that is a significant bump in graphics resolution and framerate. At the very LEAST, people should have the option for a wide range of resolutions, common to monitors today.
So who are these people who are against having a higher resolution than 1080p? If you are a first-time player of this game, and you don't own the console versions, shouldn't you want the best that you can get on your PC? If you are a double-dipper, shouldn't you want a more enhanced version (otherwise, why not stick with your console version)? If you have played and owned a console version of the game and are not planning on buying the PC version, then what are you doing in this thread, other than to rile up the PC gamers who want more, as is the standard for PC games or ports?
So who are these people who are against having a higher resolution than 1080p?
![]()
Finished building it today, $18,000 machine.
i7-4960X, 64GB DDR3 2400Mhz RAM, 4 x GTX780 Ti's, 4 x 512GB Samsung 840 EVOs in RAID, 4 x 3TB HDD, etc etc...
My home PC is more than capable(i7-3930k, 2 x MSI Lighting GTX680s) but hopefully there will be a mod in the future to make 4K doable.
actually my 1440p monitor has no scalar, so if I cannot run a game at 1440p, there are headaches. So this game goes from a possible buy to a no.
Fuck, I lol'd
Can you explain the pic to me then? It's probably a meme or something but I don't understand it.
Can you explain the pic to me then? It's probably a meme or something but I don't understand it.
Bat- symbol.........a device used to signal batman when they need his help. This being the Durante-symbol...... signifying that we need the Well-Dressed Knight to emerge from the shadows to pull us from the depths of non native resolutions.
The head is Durante.![]()
Look back a bit.
I'm sorry, but this doesn't make any sense. At all. In the least. Why would you make the resolution configurable and then not make it fully configurable? I mean, that makes less sense than not making it configurable at all.
I'm sorry, but this doesn't make any sense. At all. In the least. Why would you make the resolution configurable and then not make it fully configurable? I mean, that makes less sense than not making it configurable at all.
Can you explain the pic to me then? It's probably a meme or something but I don't understand it.
![]()
Finished building it today, $18,000 machine.
i7-4960X, 64GB DDR3 2400Mhz RAM, 4 x GTX780 Ti's, 4 x 512GB Samsung 840 EVOs in RAID, 4 x 3TB HDD, etc etc...
My home PC is more than capable(i7-3930k, 2 x MSI Lighting GTX680s) but hopefully there will be a mod in the future to make 4K doable.
![]()
Finished building it today, $18,000 machine.
i7-4960X, 64GB DDR3 2400Mhz RAM, 4 x GTX780 Ti's, 4 x 512GB Samsung 840 EVOs in RAID, 4 x 3TB HDD, etc etc...
My home PC is more than capable(i7-3930k, 2 x MSI Lighting GTX680s) but hopefully there will be a mod in the future to make 4K doable.
Worst case I can think of is that they don't know how to request available resolutions and just hardcoded a set of resolutions available, like some old bad ports did. Add to that the possible ini settings being an index to this list, which would need hex-editting on the .exe.
We might be jumping to conclusions too soon tho.
Wow, difficult crowd. I'm happy with my 5 year old graphics card that may be able to run this game at 720p.
I'm sorry, but this doesn't make any sense. At all. In the least. Why would you make the resolution configurable and then not make it fully configurable? I mean, that makes less sense than not making it configurable at all.
Wow, difficult crowd. I'm happy with my 5 year old graphics card that may be able to run this game at 720p.
Not only old. The recent Resident Evil: Revelations PC port was like that.
Every time someone complained about their res not being supported they released a patch that introduced support for that specific resolution, LOL. Then the next day someone else complained about some other res, they released a new patch to support that res and so on.
https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/1380041_10202457878675537_124855495_n.jpg[IMG]
Finished building it today, $18,000 machine.
i7-4960X, 64GB DDR3 2400Mhz RAM, 4 x GTX780 Ti's, 4 x 512GB Samsung 840 EVOs in RAID, 4 x 3TB HDD, etc etc...
My home PC is more than capable(i7-3930k, 2 x MSI Lighting GTX680s) but hopefully there will be a mod in the future to make 4K doable.[/QUOTE]
Holy...this is just...wow...
Using PC Case Gear as a guide (save for the monitor) and assuming high-end parts:
Dell UP3214Q: $4,200
Cyborg RAT 9: $135
Strike 7: $389
Xonar Phoebus: $209 (though there's no sound card visible in the image)
4x Samsung 840 Pro: $1,916
Windows 8.1 Pro: $159
4x GTX 780 Ti (factory overclocked): $3,596
3x 4TB HDDs: $956
Seasonic X-1250 Gold: $349
High-end E-ATX case: $399
i7 4960X: $1,199
Corsair H110: $169
64GB DDR3-2400: $718
Total: ~$14.3k (excluding any shipping costs). Either your mate got ripped off or he's being rather liberal with the purported cost.
Edit: Forgot the BD-RE drive, but that only adds another ~$120.
It was a system for a customer. I work at a PC store.