Support NeoGAF

[dr guildo]

so strange. I live in san Francisco. They got so close.... Something about it tho isnt there. Those shots look good tho. no shade.

The people, streets feel empty compared to the first WD, GTA5...

Edit : New page, counter to zero

 

[dr guildo]

 

[ResidentDante]

 

[ResidentDante]

 

[icecold1983]

watch dogs 2 has good art, tech doesnt hold up

 

[dr guildo]

Damn , that's a great shot. Nice work

Thank you !

watch dogs 2 has good art, tech doesnt hold up

Yep, I consider GTAV being above in terms of technical accomplishment.

 

[Tyaren]

 

[icecold1983]

Thank you !



Yep, I consider GTAV being above in terms of technical accomplishment.

yeah its strange that ubi is still unable to surpass whats essentially a ps360 game

 

[The Jason]

Watchdogs 2 (PS4 Pro)

Ok this to me just looks incredible. We have come a long way with gaming graphics.

 

[Tyaren]

 

[ResidentDante]

 

[ResidentDante]

 

[Teepo671]

 

[Teepo671]

 

[dr guildo]

yeah its strange that ubi is still unable to surpass whats essentially a ps360 game

Yep, I'm still amazed by the beauty and the consistency of this game. That is why WD2 has a hard time by impressing me.

 

[ResidentDante]

Don't tell anyone what? That I couldn't KEEP OUT?!

 

[ResidentDante]

 

[Basilisco V.]

 

[Basilisco V.]

 

[Piku_Ringo]

 

[Juras]

 

[Sebmugi]

 

[Sebmugi]

 

[dr guildo]

 

[dr guildo]

 

[Sebmugi]

The water reflections with the fog always gives strange things but GG, beautiful screens
the last one guildo <3 oO

In watch dogs 2 there are only the shadows that are really a notch below the rest :/ The lights really make me think of FH3 ^^

 

[Sebmugi]

 

[Juras]

 

[Sebmugi]

 

[Sebmugi]

 

[Basilisco V.]

 

[Basilisco V.]

 

[Sebmugi]

 

[Sebmugi]

 

[nelsonroyale]

Yep, I'm still amazed by the beauty and the consistency of this game. That is why WD2 has a hard time by impressing me.

Hmm I don't see it. For reference I have played GTA 5 on PS4 but not WD. As an artistic accomplishment, I think GTA 5 has the edge, but technically WD 2 looks quite a bit better to me. Better modelling, higher object density, better lighting, better draw distance.

 

[Shin-Ra]

The foliage looks excessively smeared by the TAA in Gears 4 and every shot has a 3-4 pixel wide border of duplicated pixels.

 

[dr guildo]

Hmm I don't see it. For reference I have played GTA 5 on PS4 but not WD. As an artistic accomplishment, I think GTA 5 has the edge, but technically WD 2 looks quite a bit better to me. Better modelling, higher object density, better lighting, better draw distance.

Hmmmm, I don't know, I took for more than 2Gbs of GTAV shots, and for the moment, I think GTA5 has still the edge at both, technical and artistic. I could post comparisons pics to expose my point, but this is not the place. And I play WD1, and for what I'm seeing in the WD2 shots, water is superior in WD. I could be wrong, but basing only few water shots, it seems...

 

[Shin-Ra]

 

[Shin-Ra]

 

[Sebmugi]

 

[Sebmugi]

 

[dgrdsv]

Funny how night time lighting still looks miles better than day time lighting in WD2. This was an issue with the first game, seems that they haven't been able to fix it in a sequel either.

Also - do these happen on OG PS4 as well as on PS4Pro?

 

[Micerider]

Eh, looks like Lewis Hamilton from that angle.

Edit : oh sh*t, how clueless I was...

 

[therealminime]

 

[shmoglish]

 

[Equanimity]

What is the best website or method of uploading png's that are bigger than 10MB?

 

[dgrdsv]

What is the best website or method of uploading png's that are bigger than 10MB?

In my experience - Flickr. It gives you 1TB of free storage which you can spend however you like.

With this being said a JPG with 99% or 100% quality is highly more preferable than PNG as the quality is indistinguishable in 999 out of 1000 cases while the size is 2-4 times smaller - and it loads in a browser a lot faster even on my 100Mb connection.

 

[Caayn]

In my experience - Flickr. It gives you 1TB of free storage which you can spend however you like.

With this being said a JPG with 99% or 100% quality is highly more preferable than PNG as the quality is indistinguishable in 999 out of 1000 cases while the size is 2-4 times smaller - and it loads in a browser a lot faster even on my 100Mb connection.

This. Please don't start uploading >10MB screenshots. I'm on a 500/500 connection and this thread start to load slowly on pages with lots of uncompressed 4K shots.

 

[Equanimity]

In my experience - Flickr. It gives you 1TB of free storage which you can spend however you like.

With this being said a JPG with 99% or 100% quality is highly more preferable than PNG as the quality is indistinguishable in 999 out of 1000 cases while the size is 2-4 times smaller - and it loads in a browser a lot faster even on my 100Mb connection.

Thanks for your suggestion. I'll give Flickr a shot with PNG's

I need to capture similar screenshots to see the difference betwee JPG's and PNG's on the Pro. Thanks for your info on JPG.

 

[Piku_Ringo]