maybe up the screens per post to three, i think 2 screens is such a handicap sometimesIs everyone still good with the thread rules we have? I figure I'll keep it the same, but I just want to be sure there aren't any issues, since the 2017 thread will be opening next week.
maybe up the screens per post to three, i think 2 screens is such a handicap sometimes
maybe up the screens per post to three, i think 2 screens is such a handicap sometimes
Yeah three per post would be a good change.
Is everyone still good with the thread rules we have? I figure I'll keep it the same, but I just want to be sure there aren't any issues, since the 2017 thread will be opening next week.
Is everyone still good with the thread rules we have? I figure I'll keep it the same, but I just want to be sure there aren't any issues, since the 2017 thread will be opening next week.
I don't think that adding more rules is a good idea. It mustn't scare people away and people already ignore some rules, such as #4, #6 and #8.Is everyone still good with the thread rules we have? I figure I'll keep it the same, but I just want to be sure there aren't any issues, since the 2017 thread will be opening next week.
My main qualm with that is that we would then have up to 50-100 extra screenshots to load up on every page (depending on the posts per page you use). That's quite a bit on a page already filled with 100-200 screens.
I don't think that adding more rules is a good idea. It mustn't scare people away and people already ignore some rules, such as #4, #6 and #8.
The current set of rules suffices for this thread. Two consecutive with posts with two images per post is a fine balance between size of the page and amount of images per page, while preventing people from spamming. Although I'm a bit in dubio about rule #8.
You're right. I guess you should keep as it is.
What about allowing people to make three consecutive posts instead of just 2? That way one could post up to 6 images but the page load would be the exact same. We would also get to a new page sooner.
I think the rules are good as they are.![]()
Maybe make an addition that PS4 Pro screens should also always be in 1080p? Then we have less loading of gigantic images and downsampled checkerboard rendered images look prettier anyway.
The three images per post suggestion would imo not be a good idea. Already now my PC with considerably fast internet is sometimes struggling with a page.
As people tend to post the same game in consecutive posts I fear that that'll lead to more monotonous pages. If you want to go three consecutive posts I think that you might as well remove the consecutive posts limit all together.What about allowing people to make three consecutive posts instead of just 2? That way one could post up to 6 images but the page load would be the exact same.
It's not a raceWe would also get to a new page sooner.
It only works like that on the XB1. Screenshot resolution on the PS4 is a separate setting.Unless im looking at this the wrong way, that would basically mean setting the PS4 Pro to 1080p every single time anyone wants to take a screenshot and post it on here and then set it back to the 4K res after?
If thats the case, thats way too much hassle.
If I'm wrong, ill be on my way.
As people tend to post the same game in consecutive posts I fear that that'll lead to more monotonous pages. If you want to go three consecutive posts I think that you might as well remove the consecutive posts limit all together.
It's not a race
It only works like that on the XB1. Screenshot resolution on the PS4 is a separate setting.
It's not a race![]()