• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

4D Object Challenge

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have to construct a 3D model of a 4D Octahedron. I'm having a lot of trouble finding any pictures to use as reference. Could anyone point me to a site which has such things?

Or better yet, could someone explain how to go about constructing one.
 
BobbyRobby said:
I have to construct a 3D model of a 4D Octahedron. I'm having a lot of trouble finding any pictures to use as reference. Could anyone point me to a site which has such things?

Or better yet, could someone explain how to go about constructing one.

4D?? So it's length, width, depth, and......... time?

I used google and clicked on the first link.

http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/~pbourke/polyhedra/platonic4d/

Here's what I found:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross Polytope
Also known as 16 cell or hexadecachoron

Dual with hypercube

4D equivalent of the octahedron

16 tetrahedral cells, 32 triangular faces, 24 edges, 8 vertices

4 tetrahedra meet at an edge

The generation sequence is: Point - Line - Square - Octahedron - Crosspolytope
------------------------------------------------------------------------------


16cellslices.gif

16cellsolid.gif

16cellpov.jpg


Just use google, I found a lots of pics and info on 4d octahedron.
 
tenchir said:
4D?? So it's length, width, depth, and......... time?
Not necessarily time. One can imagine a theoretical fourth spatial dimension that we're just not well equipped to deal with. I'm not sure if there's a standard convention about what to call a fourth to go along with "length" and the rest, though.

Looks like you and Google have done a nice job of providing help, tenchir. I've read up a bit on this stuff, but not enough to help a great deal. I remember the basic idea of creating a 3D model of a 4D shape is analagous to how we often see 3D shapes turned into 2D versions of themselves for display on our limited monitors. And as is the case with a 3D shape being viewed on a 2D screen, what that lower-dimensional representation will look like can differ a lot depending on the viewing angles.
 
I usually just refer to any extra dimensions not easily described as physical aspects (ie: time, density, some sort of tempreture gradient, etc) as sub-dimensions. They're actually kindof fun to play around with in math.
 
morbidaza said:
I usually just refer to any extra dimensions not easily described as physical aspects (ie: time, density, some sort of tempreture gradient, etc) as sub-dimensions. They're actually kindof fun to play around with in math.
whoa, slow down there. you can't use the words "fun" and "math" in the same sentence.
 
Scrow said:
whoa, slow down there. you can't use the words "fun" and "math" in the same sentence.

what about:

integral(e^x)=f(u^n)

if you write it out, this mathemtical formula spells out sex=fun
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom