OttomanScribe
Member
100 per page is by far the superior choice.
To unbelievers I say 'dracarys'.
To unbelievers I say 'dracarys'.
381/2=190.5=191catfish said:I've always liked you timedog, where might I find such a utility for endless browsing?
lol page 381 what now professor?!
Death Note said:381/2=190.5=191
Google search is inferior to VB search in every single way. I hope they roll it back out soon. I rarely waste my time with google search and I'm not going to hurt my thread browsing experience for the rare times I do use the crap search.catfish said:you 100 page hippies have to perform maths in the form of division followed by more followup maths in the form of rounding to get your inferior system to work.
It's not even compatible with google and google knows everything. Also, my thread made the second page already, right on.
Gen X said:If it's set to 50 then technically you're loading more info each page since it has to load twice as many adverts.![]()
Bjoern the Smexy said:Just as a reminder:
This thread has 1 page right now. Not 2.
So have I, and I use 50. Autopager is the real king; load one page and continuously scroll through a thread without ever hitting 'next page', auto loading the next page seamlessly under the current page.Tobor said:There are 70 posts in this thread, and I just glanced at all of them on one page. 100 rules, 50 drools.
This is what I always do....surprised OP hasn't discovered this magicChldRebelSoldr said:Divide the page number you get in the url by half. Done.
Unknown Soldier said:100 posts per page is the ONE TRUE NUMBER OF POSTS PER PAGE.
Soda said:This thread reminds me of a metric vs American units argument.
adelante said:This is what I always do....surprised OP hasn't discovered this magic
well... it's a bit different, cause in that argument there is a clear winner.Soda said:This thread reminds me of a metric vs American units argument.
Stop loading the page as soon as you open it, then just open by post. That's what I do. Beats trying to download EVERYTHING all at once, two at a time is much more manageable.Mr_Zombie said:Unless it is a "High-Res PC Screenshot Thread" D:
Seriously, that thread made my browser crash several times now.
manipulate said:This man does not shy away from confronting the great questions of our time, I'll say that.