• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

51 pound tumour removed from woman who delayed treatment for insurance

Status
Not open for further replies.
Surgeons have removed a 51 pound cancerous tumour from a US woman who delayed treatment for until she became eligible for health insurance.

Evelyn, identified only by her first name, notice discomfort about six to eight weeks ago in her abdomen and her normally 120 pound frame was ballooning.

She sought medical help on June 4, days after her 65th birthday, when she would qualify for Medicare, the US health care programme for seniors

“She was a skinny lady with a huge belly. I mean it looked like she was literally pregnant with triplets,” said Dr David Dupree, who led the surgery on the woman, at Riverview Medical Center in Red Bank, New Jersey.

“She was just all belly,” he said in describing his first meeting with the patient, a housewife from nearby Union Beach, New Jersey.

“The reason she didn’t go earlier was because she had no insurance,” he said.

By now, she weighed more than 170 pounds, her legs were swollen with trapped blood, she was badly dehydrated, and, scans showed, the tumour – a malignant sarcoma – was crushing her inferior vena cava, one of the main veins returning blood to the heart, and putting her life in danger.

With her body too weakened to be operated on immediately, Dr Dupree scheduled surgery for the following Monday, allowing time for her to become rehydrated and for her blood pressure to be brought under control.

But after she became short of breath on Sunday evening, Dr Dupree brought the surgery forward.

“I knew that she wasn’t going to make it through the night,” he said.

“Either she goes now or she dies tonight,” he recalled thinking.

Opening her up, Dr Dupree and his team found the tumour, which appeared to have originated out of the fatty tissue around her large intestine, had engulfed many of her internal organs, and had to be sliced away “millimetre by millimetre” over the course of the five-hour surgery.

Evelyn was still recovering from the operation in a rehabilitation centre on Tuesday, Dr Dupree said. She declined to be interviewed.

Although the immediate threat to her life has passed, she must still see an oncologist about treatment for her cancer, which may not have been completely eradicated by the surgery, and may require chemotherapy or radiation therapy.

Dr Dupree said he would advise uninsured patients to see a doctor immediately if they knew they were unwell no matter how near their 65th birthday might be. He said the hospital would have operated on Evelyn regardless of her insurance status, but added he did not know whether doing so would have cost her more money.
 

DrBo42

Member
So sad that the idea of pushing off a life saving surgery because of insurance even enters a mind. What a world.
 
"I don't know why you are happy, now we are going to have shitty healthcare like those other countries where going to the doctor is pretty much a death sentence."


Dumb ass coworkers...
 

zon

Member
I never would've been able to wait like she did. I would've gone to the hospital immediately, healthcare or no.
 

Mariolee

Member
Jeez, that's some terrible stuff. I don't even wanna see the pic; I just had breakfast and don't want to lose it.
 
R8ck4.jpg


I smell a Basket Case reunion.
 

JGS

Banned
Dr Dupree said he would advise uninsured patients to see a doctor immediately if they knew they were unwell no matter how near their 65th birthday might be. He said the hospital would have operated on Evelyn regardless of her insurance status, but added he did not know whether doing so would have cost her more money.
Most important part. It's a shame that fear overtook reality.
 

Curtisaur

Forum Landmine
I'm paying for insurance I can't use because of a pre-existing condition. But I guess Medicare doesn't worry about pre-existing conditions? 40 years to go!
 

kswiston

Member
Health care in the US is actually pretty great. Health insurance on the other hand is a mess. I think it's a distinction that should be made though.

Healthcare in the US is pretty great if you can afford it. Overall, it is not. Hence, lower life expectancy, higher maternal mortality, etc compared to many other developed countries.

Same as education. Most of the best universities in the world are in the US, but overall education (most notably at the primary and secondary levels) lags behind most developed countries unless you have the money to pay for it.
 
That's an extreme scenario, but if I had a life-threatening condition while not having insurance, that I thought I could survive until some insurance kicked it, you best believe I'd be holding on to that shit. I don't want to die, but extremely invasive surgery and recovery could be the different between be owing $10k, an amount I could feasibly pay off, and literally paying money into the health care industry for the rest of my life. Depends on the circumstances, but I might take that risk.
 
If health insurance is such a mess, then why are people being forced into purchasing it?

Because the other reforms in the health care law that were put into place to improve the insurance situation require a strong incentive to get healthy people to share the costs.

Denying coverage to people with preexisting medical conditions is bad but it would also be a disaster if everyone just waited until they were sick before trying to buy health insurance. I'd personally rather see universal healthcare or a single payer system but I'm afraid that will not be politically feasible in this country for a very long time.
 

Chumly

Member
The hospital probably would have written off the majority of it as charity.
There's only so much charity hospitals can perform and it definitely doesnt come even close to providing enough care for the uninsured.
 

Yoritomo

Member
Can we please just get single payer going?!

WTF is the problem? No one should be deciding their medical care based on insurance or income. Having our healthcare tied to employment is a huge restriction on our own labor force. Sure I wouldn't mind an alternative that doesn't necessitate a single payer government run solution but the only places able to implement these sorts of systems ENFORCE said systems with extreme control and in practice have enough regulatory control that they might as well be single payer (Singapore).

I'm pretty damned libertarian and literally anything is better than the system we have now.
 

Diablos

Member
Hope she recovers fully.

Also, lol @ critics of socialized medicine and wait times in the UK, Canada, Sweden, etc.

IT CAN HAPPEN HERE, TOO. AND IT DOES.
 

Particle Physicist

between a quark and a baryon
If health insurance is such a mess, then why are people being forced into purchasing it?

The system is screwed up, but because of the reforms, there are many fixes coming. Single payer would be a much better system than PPACA, but PPACA is much better than what we had before, so at the very least, it's an improvement.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom