I honestly don't know what Spicer could have said to that question. Lol. Just ignore him, he doesn't know what he is talking about?
Do we have to pay attention to every little thing the president says? It's social media. We should be focusing on policy.
In a thread in which the discussion centers around his garbage policies being struck down due to his garbage words? That's your takeaway?
Yep he played himself. Big time. Think of what else can be used against him now...
The best part is they've been making the push recently to use LESS official communications , have more off camera briefings, etc. and let Trump speak for himself. It turns out that's the stupidest fucking thing you could do.
After the ruling from US District Judge Derrick Watson in Hawaii, Attorney General Jeff Sessions criticized the action, saying he was "amazed that a judge sitting on an island in the Pacific can issue an order that stops the President of the United States from what appears to be clearly his statutory and constitutional power."
Think that was satire
The article has a very disrespectful quote from Sessions (but not surprising with his reputation), it sounds like he is implying that Hawaiians aren't real Americans:
They better be scrubbing out all Russia + Comey gloating tweets he did a few months back.
Implying?The article has a very disrespectful quote from Sessions (but not surprising with his reputation), it sounds like he is implying that Hawaiians aren't real Americans:
Daaaamn...what other tweets by Trump could be used against him in Court?
Since the Spicer quote has fucked him for good.
I *love* this precedent
L Niño
Ahahaahahahahahahahaahhahaa
He's not going to learn, either. Every tweet he's made since becoming president (and possible many beforehand) will now be tossed in as official statements during these cases, but he'll keep ranting and raving nonetheless.
He's not so much shooting himself in the foot as putting his foot in a hydraulic press and holding down the on button as his foot is slowly pulverized.
They aren't. They're citizens of the Kingdom of Hawai'i.The article has a very disrespectful quote from Sessions (but not surprising with his reputation), it sounds like he is implying that Hawaiians aren't real Americans:
The rulings apply to the circuit they're given in. When there's a circuit split usually the Supreme Court will settle it.How do these rulings work? If there's at least one court who strikes down these bans, that's it? What if another court in another party of the country ruled the opposite?