• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

A cure for affirmative action?

Status
Not open for further replies.

whytemyke

Honorary Canadian.
I don't think anyone would deny that AA is racist. It's supposed to. I think people that really understand it know that the unfairness to the majority is one they'll have to bear to avoid the disenfranchisement of the minority. However, it appears a school district in Raleigh, North Carolina is beginning to look for ways to stop the whole affirmative action thing. This isn't about affirmative action, per se, but it definitely is setting the stage to hopefully get rid of it down the road. Best idea i've seen used in schools in years here.

New York Times said:
September 25, 2005
As Test Scores Jump, Raleigh Credits Integration by Income
By ALAN FINDER
RALEIGH, N.C. - Over the last decade, black and Hispanic students here in Wake County have made such dramatic strides in standardized reading and math tests that it has caught the attention of education experts around the country.

The main reason for the students' dramatic improvement, say officials and parents in the county, which includes Raleigh and its sprawling suburbs, is that the district has made a concerted effort to integrate the schools economically.

Since 2000, school officials have used income as a prime factor in assigning students to schools, with the goal of limiting the proportion of low-income students in any school to no more than 40 percent.

The effort is the most ambitious in the country to create economically diverse public schools, and it is the most successful, according to several independent experts. La Crosse, Wis.; St. Lucie County, Fla.; San Francisco; Cambridge, Mass.; and Charlotte-Mecklenburg, N.C., have adopted economic integration plans.

In Wake County, only 40 percent of black students in grades three through eight scored at grade level on state tests a decade ago. Last spring, 80 percent did. Hispanic students have made similar strides. Overall, 91 percent of students in those grades scored at grade level in the spring, up from 79 percent 10 years ago.

School officials here have tried many tactics to improve student performance. Teachers get bonuses when their schools make significant progress in standardized tests, and the district uses sophisticated data gathering to identify, and respond to, students' weaknesses.

Some of the strategies used in Wake County could be replicated across the country, the experts said, but they also cautioned that unusual circumstances have helped make the politically delicate task of economic integration possible here.

The school district is countywide, which makes it far easier to combine students from the city and suburbs. The county has a 30-year history of busing students for racial integration, and many parents and students are accustomed to long bus rides to distant schools. The local economy is robust, and the district is growing rapidly. And corporate leaders and newspaper editorial pages here have firmly supported economic diversity in the schools.

Some experts said the academic results in Wake County were particularly significant because they bolstered research that showed low-income students did best when they attended middle-class schools.

"Low-income students who have an opportunity to go to middle-class schools are surrounded by peers who have bigger dreams and who are more academically engaged," said Richard D. Kahlenberg, a senior fellow at the Century Foundation who has written about economic integration in schools. "They are surrounded by parents who are more likely to be active in the school. And they are taught by teachers who more likely are highly qualified than the teachers in low-income schools."

To achieve a balance of low- and middle-income children in every school, the Wake County school district encourages and sometimes requires students to attend schools far from home. Suburban students are drawn to magnet schools in the city. Low-income children from the city are bused to middle-class schools in the suburbs.

Some parents chafe at the length of their children's bus rides or at what they see as social engineering. But the test results are hard to dispute, proponents of economic integration say, as is the broad appeal of the school district, which has been growing by 5,000 students a year.

"What I say to parents is, 'Here is what you should hold me accountable for: at the end of that bus ride, are we providing a quality education for your child?' " Bill McNeal, the school superintendent, said.

Asked how parents respond, Mr. McNeal said, "They are coming back, and they are bringing their friends."

Not everyone supports the strategy. Some parents deeply oppose mandatory assignments to schools. Every winter, the district, using a complicated formula, develops a list of students who will be reassigned to new schools for the following academic year, and nearly every year some parents object vehemently.

"Kids are bused all over creation, and they say it's for economic diversity, but really it's a proxy for race," said Cynthia Matson, who is white and middle class. She is the president and a founder of Assignment By Choice, an advocacy group promoting parental choice.

The organization wants parents to be responsible for selecting schools, and it objects to restrictions that, in certain circumstances, make it difficult for some middle-class children to get into magnet schools.

"If a parent wants their kid bused, then let them make the choice," Mrs. Matson said. "But don't force parents to have their kids bused across town to go to a school that they don't want to go to."

Supporters of economic integration contend that the county offers parents many choices but that the school district needs the discretion to assign some children to schools to avoid large concentrations of poor children. "I believe in choice as much as anyone," Mr. McNeal said. "However, I can't let choice erode our ability to provide quality programs and quality teaching."

The board of education had two motives when it decided to make economic integration a main element in the district's strategy: board members feared that the county's three-decade effort to integrate public schools racially would be found unconstitutional if challenged in the federal courts, and they took note of numerous studies that showed the academic benefits of economically diversifying schools.

"There is a lot of evidence that it's just sound educational policy, sound public policy, to try to avoid concentrations of low-achieving students," said John H. Gilbert, a professor emeritus at North Carolina State University in Raleigh who served for 16 years on the county school board and voted for the plan. "They do much better and advantaged students are not hurt by it if you follow policies that avoid concentrating low-achievement students."

One sign of the success of the Wake County plan, Mr. Gilbert said, is that residential property values in Raleigh have remained high, as have those in the suburbs. "The economy is really saying something about the effort in the city," he said.

About 27 percent of the county's students are low-income, a proportion that has increased slightly in recent years. While many are black and Hispanic, about 15 percent are white. Moreover, more than 40 percent of the district's black students are working- and middle-class, and not poor.

Wake County has used many strategies to limit the proportion of low-income students in schools to 40 percent. For example, magnet schools lure many suburban parents to the city.

Betty Trevino lives in Fuquay-Varina, a town in southern Wake County. Ms. Trevino drives her son, Eric, 5, to and from the Joyner Elementary School, where he goes to kindergarten. Students are taught in English and Spanish, and global themes are emphasized at the school, which is north of downtown Raleigh, more than 20 miles from the Trevinos' home. With traffic, the trip takes 45 minutes each way.

"I think it works," she said of her drive halfway across the county, "because it's such a good school."

Many low-income children are bused to suburban schools. While some of their parents are unhappy with the length of the rides, some also said they were happy with their child's school.

"I think it's ridiculous," LaToya Mangum said of the 55 minutes that her son Gabriel, 7, spends riding a bus to the northern reaches of Wake County, where he is in second grade. On the other hand, she said, "So far, I do like the school."

The neighborhood school has been redefined, with complex logistics and attendance maps that can resemble madly gerrymandered Congressional districts.

The Swift Creek Elementary School, in southwest Raleigh near the city line, draws most of its students from within two miles of the school, in both the city and suburbs. But students also come to Swift Creek from four widely scattered areas in low-income sections of south and southeastern Raleigh; some live 6 to 8 miles from the school, while others are as far as 12 miles away.

Ela Browder lives in Cary, an affluent, sprawling suburb, but each morning she puts her 6-year-old son, Michael, on a bus for a short ride across the city line to Swift Creek.

"We're very happy with the school," Ms. Browder said. "The children are very enriched by it. I think it's the best of both worlds."

Of the county's 139 elementary, middle and high schools, all but 22 are within the 40 percent guideline, according to the district's data. Some are only a few percentage points above the guideline, while others are significantly higher.

The overwhelming majority of the 120,000 children in the district go either to a local school or a school of their choice, officials said. Slightly more than 85 percent of students attend a school within five miles of home and another 12 percent or so voluntarily attend magnet or year-round schools.

Although the figures can be calculated many ways, Mr. McNeal says about 2.5 percent - or about 3,000 children - are assigned to schools for economic balance or to accommodate the district's growth by filling new schools or easing overcrowding in existing ones. Most of those bused for economic diversity tend to be low-income, he said.

A school board election will take place in October. While the board has continued to endorse economic integration, some supporters worry that that could change one day.

"It's not easy and it can be very contentious in the community," said Walter C. Sherlin, who retired two years ago as an associate superintendent. "Is it worth doing? Look at 91 percent at or above grade level. Look at 139 schools, all of them successful. I think the answer is obvious."
 
Isn't this just busing, which has been judged a massive failure, despite occasional anecdotal successes like this one? Or is that just rich white folk whining to newspapers?
 
Drinky Crow said:
Isn't this just busing, which has been judged a massive failure, despite occasional anecdotal successes like this one? Or is that just rich white folk whining to newspapers?
Did you even read the article? Of course the rich white folks are mad that their kids have to go to those dirty, dirty inner city schools with all those poor people, but the numbers don't lie. 91% of kids in this, of any race/economic background, are either at or above reading and learning levels for their particular age group. I don't see how you can argue with that.

Besides, the busing issue (and why doesn't it have an extra s? never ever see it with 2 s's... bussing... busing... hm) was more hinged on race than on socio-economic background. They do make mention to poor white kids from outside of the area coming into the suburbs to attend nicer schools, so it's not looking at this as a race issue so much as one of economic functionality.

I really do think this is a huge step in the right direction for finally getting everyone treated equally. Plus, I mean, the numbers don't lie... 5,000 new students a year in that school district. That's insane.
 
And the first shoe drops

School officials here have tried many tactics to improve student performance. Teachers get bonuses when their schools make significant progress in standardized tests, and the district uses sophisticated data gathering to identify, and respond to, students' weaknesses.

Many schools have stopped teaching students how to learn and the various things they should learn and set the carrot as the standardized test - which is a teachable test. The more you teach people about the various tests (like LEAP), certainly the more people will improve. What isn't measure are the applicable results of the education.

I understand the need to have a standard of measure for schools, but when you tie teachers and principals to testing as a measure of whether or not they are doing their job - they teach and preach the standardized tests and the bar for those tests is low... very very very low.
 
It's a rich whitey thing to get all torqued up over AA, largely because it takes away a small number of slots that their precious little spawn could get at prestigious universities. Seriously, if Little Lord Fauntleroy doesn't get a slot at Columbia, what WILL the neighbors think? He would've had a chance, too, if those filthy libruls hadn't subverted the system in order to make a little room available for Those Other People.

Personally, I've never really thought twice about AA in any negative way, and frankly, I like having a little diversity in the workplace instead of sharing eight-plus hours a day with self-entitled white former frat types. The folks that do get education and hiring through AA policies tend to make much better coworkers, in my experience.
 
Drinky Crow said:
It's a rich whitey thing to get all torqued up over AA, largely because it takes away a small number of slots that their precious little spawn could get at prestigious universities. Seriously, if Little Lord Fauntleroy doesn't get a slot at Columbia, what WILL the neighbors think? He would've had a chance, too, if those filthy libruls hadn't subverted the system in order to make a little room available for Those Other People.

Personally, I've never really thought twice about AA in any negative way, and frankly, I like having a little diversity in the workplace instead of sharing eight-plus hours a day with self-entitled white former frat types. The folks that do get education and hiring through AA policies tend to make much better coworkers, in my experience.

well said. Furthermore it is a safety net.. anyone who says the "good old boys" are gone are wrong. But I will say I think Education should be based on income more than race...
 
Hm, there is an alternate explanation that is not explored in this article. Namely, the apparent economic success of the region may have a lot to do with it. It gets a passing reference in a warning from the people actually doing it and then is largely ignored for the rest of the article.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom