IntentionalPun
Ask me about my wife's perfect butthole
I said “character”.
The movies are about High Schoolers, honestly probably supposed to be under 16 in the first one.
Last edited:
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
AI videos
- Thread starter Artoris
- Start date
The movies are about High Schoolers, honestly probably supposed to be under 16 in the first one.
Dr.Guru of Peru
played the long game
ResurrectedContrarian said:But this ugly girl was put in to replace roles that were iconic like Mary Jane, and whose appearances were totally at odds with her in every way.
It's not like she's in some secondary films where her look might belong, but she's been spliced into properties that had very pretty women before, ruining characters and roles -- which also comes down to her extremely poor "i just frown and look insufferable" acting. I do find all of that annoying, and that it's a generally good thing for men to respond by continued joking & ridiculing about her smurf face
It's not like MJ Watson has a history of absolute smoke show casting choices until Zendaya. Kirsten Dunst wasn't exactly a sex symbol. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and everything, but I personally find Zendaya more attractive than her predecessor (although her face will probably start to look really gaunt very soon if she doesn't put on some weight).
As far as having the body of a 12 year, well yeah - that's what casting choices skew for when you're trying to find adults to play high schoolers. Why do you think all of the Peter Parkers who started off in high school were played by actors who were 5 feet tall?
Last edited:
ResurrectedContrarian
Suffers with mild autism
let's get back to the thread purpose...
AI making attractive things, and not the absolutely trash quality of actual pop culture and casting in 2024
AI making attractive things, and not the absolutely trash quality of actual pop culture and casting in 2024
Rich (BB code):
People are going for AI largely because mainstream productions have lost all connection to real tastes and inserted agendas. The hope is that we won't even talk about Disney one day because their control over franchises will be stolen back by AI breaking down all IP ownership, which will actually be good for human creativity and democracy.
Last edited:
mild sriracha
Member
not exactly AI video, I am sorry about that.
Last edited:
mild sriracha
Member
ResurrectedContrarian
Suffers with mild autism
The goal -- and I'm being totally serious -- is to push this tech to the point where it destroys corporate control over IP altogether, so that anyone can make a better series with a few GPUs + time + creativity.
The current rulers over the funding for TV/movies have simply ruined so many properties that this is the only reasonable future, one in which their business model is destroyed.
And I think the models will get there.
Dacvak
No one shall be brought before our LORD David Bowie without the true and secret knowledge of the Photoshop. For in that time, so shall He appear.
That’ll only make an impact for a short while. At some point, we’ll have enough global compute and AI efficiency to generate real-time content per person, and it’ll be based on individual algorithmic preference. And this will still be owned and run by corporate entities since they’ll have the money and scale to offer it.
10-15 years from now, we’ll have some AI version of “Netflix” that essentially generates our personal “perfect content” for us. The same thing will eventually happen for video games too. And, while I’m a champion of real art, I just don’t think humanity will be able to resist their perfectly created content.
In a lot of ways, we’re currently in the “golden era” of AI, where a lot of the creativity and output is driven by individuals. But at some point, it won’t be like that.
That’s my guess, at least.
ResurrectedContrarian
Suffers with mild autism
I don't know about that -- so far, the community of AI hobbyists has been simply incredible, taking image models (and other models) and building impressive tooling that has often beat the latest "official" research, and optimizing all of it to run on consumer GPUs.
On top of that, there are newer companies like FAL that hyper-optimize AI on the cloud with zero content limitations and a heavy appeal to make it your personal playground without limitation. These startups -- because they aren't limited by "safety" straightjackets of Google etc -- have gained tremendously.
I don't think the corporate powers will contain AI. Right now, you can run free, open-source models that rival the leading private ones in every area (image, video, language, etc) and if you don't have a strong enough GPU, you can rent private cloud compute to run it on securely. That will continue. They won't be able to contain AI as they have other tech.
I also think that creator-driven content will continue to flourish. Individualized, yes, but also creator driven -- because people want to step into someone else's world, be surprised and amazed at what they find, etc.
Ahh good old mass farming of stolen artwork and content to help "train" the AI slop.
Dacvak
No one shall be brought before our LORD David Bowie without the true and secret knowledge of the Photoshop. For in that time, so shall He appear.
These are all really good points. And to riff off of your last point, I think the social aspects of content will likely continue to be important in a significant way. It’s just really hard to predict what that’ll look like.
Yeah, honestly, I genuinely just don’t know what’ll happen. This is like someone trying to predict the exact ramifications of “inventing the internet” or something. It’s really wild to think about.
Pejo
Gold Member
This one cracked me up for some reason. Naruto lifting the binoculars up to his nose for smell-o-vision.
ResurrectedContrarian
Suffers with mild autism
lol I spotted the butt shot at 4:15 added for possible thumbnail bait... and then checked the timeline scrub to verify it's the most replayed 5 seconds
music on these is also AI gen, although I guess the channel person writes the lyrics, which aren't great
decent showcase of tech and aesthetics though
ResurrectedContrarian
Suffers with mild autism
this is how our video game character designs could look... it's the future they tried to take from you
Fortunately, recent disasters like Concord signal a sea change, and the future might be beautiful again soon.
sono
Gold Member
MrCunningham
Member
AI 007 Goldeneye: The Dam Stage:
Denton
Member
I watched them all and it is indeed fantastic. This generative AI is really gonna be quite a revolution, talented writers being able to make entire high quality series alone in the bedrooms without any need of other people or equipment besides a PC.
Little Mac
Member
Take notes Kevin Feige.
Last edited:
Melon Husk
Member
The amount of artificial beauty on this page is breaking my brain a bit. Space babes especially, it's like I've glimpsed a thousand years into the future where humanity has created an idealized version of itself.
Blue hair was never the problem
AJUMP23
Parody of actual AJUMP23
GladiusFrog
Member
This is my favorite one, made by a close friend so have to plug it lol.
mild sriracha
Member
It's Always The Real Thing my ass.
Here's one from the 1990s for comparison.
Last edited:
mild sriracha
Member
steampunk !
PrefectAboro
Member
Really interested in this "image/video to video" style of A.I. Can probably replace motion capture in the future.
This one is made by "X-Portrait 2" and is more impressive than the Runaway Act-One.
https://byteaigc.github.io/X-Portrait2/clip/merged_vids/017+EXP-3-cheeks+nose.mp4
https://byteaigc.github.io/X-Portrait2/clip/comparisons/shining_comp.mp4
This one is made by "X-Portrait 2" and is more impressive than the Runaway Act-One.
https://byteaigc.github.io/X-Portrait2/clip/merged_vids/017+EXP-3-cheeks+nose.mp4
https://byteaigc.github.io/X-Portrait2/clip/comparisons/shining_comp.mp4
ResilientBanana
Member
sono
Gold Member
The sheer amount of detail in each scene in this it is spectacular
What a perfectly beautiful dystopian nightmare...
mild sriracha
Member
It seems AI video is a great medium for satire & comedy & any content that does not take itself too seriously.
macfoshizzle
Member
lol these are all fun. I just got into these AI video rabbit hole and have to admit, got me hooked. And I'll be honest, it's the ones with the babes. But what's up with most of them being in Panavision? Is it to compensate for the limitation of the video quality?
Artoris
Gold Member
This is only the beginning for AI I will get a lot better