Amanda Knox engaged to prison penpal

Status
Not open for further replies.
Its still better than in the US.

Presumably, like most Italian cases, the ones you hear about are less stupid than the ones you don't. I don't judge the entire Italian judicial system by that one vain, blowhard retard, and I don't judge all American law based on Johnny Cochrane.
 
OJ is a pretty damn opaque liquid.

I know this from bagging all those groceries.

AoQ1Jiy.gif
 
I actually didn't pay attention to these kinds of trials, so the whole Amanda Knox thing was just background noise. The other day, my girlfriend found the TV movie on the whole thing on Netflix and wanted to watch it, but it was ... so on the fence about everything, how she acted, if she was guilty, what the police found, how the trial went, that it really didn't do a good job at representing why the case was interesting at all, nor what made it a 'circus'.
 
A good documentary doesn't choose sides. That's your job as the viewer.

It wasn't a documentary, it was a cheap made for TV movie thing. It didn't provide to me anything that I could use to choose a side, aside from a few surface details about her strange behavior. It didn't delve into what made it a "circus", or anything like that.
 
Been a while since I read up on the story, but Meredith Kercher (sp?) went home with this violent drifter named Rudy Gueda (sp?) who left his DNA all over the apartment.

Knox comes home, find's her roommate's body, calls police.

The prosecution's theory is that Knox and Gueda, having just met, spontaneously decide to murder Knox's roommate together.
 
How do people seem so convinced of her guilt? The whole thing was a sham and they didn't prove jack-shit.

^I think because she knowingly accused an innocent man convinced a lot of people she is a liar and her word should not be trusted.

It is pretty messed up what she did to that man.
 
Creepy thread, but for anyone interested in the case, here is a report from the Italian judge who let her go:

http://hellmannreport.wordpress.com/contents/

The reason he let her go is that it is virtually certain she didn't do it. The evidence is almost enough to prove conclusively that she is innocent.

The actual killer has been found. Rudy Guede. His bloody fingerprints were at the scene, and his skin cells were inside the victim's body. He fled the country. He got caught and claimed the sex with the victim was consensual (clearly expecting a different line of questioning). Initially asked about Knox he didn't know why they were asking and admitted she wasn't there.

edit: should probably add that Guede had been arrested only days before murdering this victim, for another incident of breaking and entering armed with a knife.

The whole trial, and the gross media concoction of "foxy knoxy" to create bias, were unbelievable. Luckily the Italian judge understood she was clearly innocent, and the actual killer was already caught elsewhere, and let her go.

Funny thing is, if you press them on it, literally everyone I have ever discussed the case with will admit Guede did it. There isn't any rational doubt. But they are so attached to the "foxy knoxy" media construction that they can't let it go.
 
the only sad thing that matters to me is that Meredith Kercher will never find peace. It breaks my heart
 
^I think because she knowingly accused an innocent man convinced a lot of people she is a liar and her word should not be trusted.

It is pretty messed up what she did to that man.

That's it? Because she gave a false statement, she did it? If she just called up and said "this guy did it," then yeah. If it was, instead, the product of a police interrogation going on for dozens of hours straight being deprived of food, sleep, and comfort, then it's not all that damning, in my opinion. I don't trust the police. They got the Norfolk Four to confess to outrageously IMPOSSIBLE crimes by interrogating them for hours.

OJ had his shoe treads that only 6 in the world were made at the crime scene in blood. I want THAT kind of evidence. Not just 'she lied once.' Physical evidence that makes this murder somewhat PLAUSIBLE, even. I'm setting the bar low here. I just want plausibility, and I haven't even seen THAT.
 
Amanda's wrongful imprisonment isn't sad? Didnt the prison lie and tell her she was HIV positive at one point?

I don't know if she did it or not. I only know a girl has been killed and her assassins are still on the run. This is the only fact and one damn sad one
 
I'm pretty sure there is some a person currently locked up for her murder.

edit: Rudy Guede is doing 30 years for the murder, seems like it was reduced to 16 years.
 
A good documentary doesn't choose sides. That's your job as the viewer.
Naw, a good documentary starts with a hypothesis and goes from there. Some of the best documentaries I've seen have just been covering subjects that are impossible to have a neutral stance on.

What a good documentary does is inform on a subject or issue in a manner that isn't deceptive or misleading. Neutrality can be part of that, sure, but it's not required.
 
the only sad thing that matters to me is that Meredith Kercher will never find peace. It breaks my heart

This. Fuck all of the drama surrounding Knox. Pretty crazy that Meredith's death seems to have almost taken a backseat in favour of all the drama surrounding her supposed murderer. But I guess this to be expected.
 
This poor woman has been through hell and people are giving her shit about her looks? Glad she has found someone.

Fuck her for ruining an innocent man's life by falsely accusing him.

@vas_a_morir: It wasn't a simple finger pointing "he did it." She gave a very detailed statement:

In Knox's statements to the police, she said that, that evening, she met Patrick at the basketball court in the Piazza Grimana and they went home; that Patrick had sex with Meredith, with whom he was infatuated; and that she vaguely remembered that Patrick had killed Meredith. As a result of this statement (and a second one which added extra details, such as Knox's fear of Patrick), Patrick Lumumba was arrested by police. Forensic examinations of his premises and possessions were begun. Contrary to some accounts, Knox did not immediately retract this accusation and Patrick was held in custody for two weeks. On the evening of the murder, Patrick had had only customer in his pub: a Swiss academic who had talked politics with him. Back in Zurich, the man heard by chance about Lumumba’s arrest and contacted police with an alibi. Patrick was then released.

Knox repeated this statement four hours later, and then committed it to paper the next day without being prompted: "I stand by my statements that I made last night about events that could have taken place in my home with Patrik". While she confided to her mother on November 10 that the accusation was false and completely spontaneous, neither Knox nor her mother alerted her lawyers or the authorities that she had falsely accused Lumumba in the three weeks he was held. The Supreme Court upheld her calunnia conviction, arguing that although Knox claimed to feel bad about what she had done, this conversation and her inaction proved Knox's criminal indifference to Lumumba's suffering. The court adds that there is no room for the accusation to be a consequence of youth or a misunderstanding: they note that while Knox was young at the time, she was an adult at 20 years old, a university student and from a culture which also does not allow people to falsely accuse others of crimes.
 
Fuck her for ruining an innocent man's life by falsely accusing him.



The judge who let her go also explains what happened with this:

https://hellmannreport.wordpress.com/contents/reasons-for-the-decision/calumny/


The obsessive length of the interrogations, carried out during [both] day and night, by more than one person, on a young and foreign girl who at the time did not speak Italian at all well, was unaware of her own rights, did not have the assistance of an attorney (which she should have been entitled to, being at this point suspected of very serious crimes), and was moreover being assisted by an interpreter who — as shown by Ms. Bongiorno — did not limit herself to translating, but induced her to force herself to remember, explaining that she [Amanda] was confused in her memories, perhaps because of the trauma she experienced...

But why Patrick Lumumba, exactly? Because the police had found, on Amanda Knox’s phone, the message “see you later”, sent by her to Lumumba on the evening of November 1; which could also mean she actually intended to see him later to go somewhere, maybe to the house on Via Della Pergola — whence the insistent questioning about that message, its meaning, and its intended recipient.


The questioning was not filmed, and was performed without an attorney present. This was a violation committed by the police which made it inadmissible at the murder trial.

She was asked questions in a language she didn't understand well, and the questions were never written out in english for her. The translator, in the absence of the required attorney, told Knox she was confused in her memories. Then the police zeroed in on Patrick Lumumba because of the message they had found.

Even then, it took a grueling interrogation, throughout day and night, and only by 1:45 AM were they able to pull something about Lumumba (who again, they had already decided on, and were now trying to get).



But let's ignore that for a second, and focus on what she actually said:

"However, it was under this pressure and after many hours of confusion that my mind came up with these answers. In my mind I saw Patrik in flashes of blurred images."

"But the truth is, I am unsure about the truth and here's why"

"Why did I think of Patrik?"


This is not what she said after the fact. This is literally what she wrote on that very day, after hour upon hour of interrogation in violation of her right to an attorney, and in a language she didn't know well, with police already focused on Patrick because of the message.

So, while you can certainly blame her for not being strong enough to stand up to the police, you also have to admit she at least said she wasn't sure about Patrick, and only used the name after the grueling interrogation focusing on him. I give her some of the blame, but most of it in the police in that situation.
 
Fuck her for ruining an innocent man's life by falsely accusing him.

@vas_a_morir: It wasn't a simple finger pointing "he did it." She gave a very detailed statement:

The Norfolk four gave details of their 'rape' and 'murder' with pornographic detail: A rape and murder that was literally impossible for them to have perpetrated. It doesn't mean that much to me because I know how police interrogations work. Interrogations are torture designed to get specific statements through hours and hours of deprivation and circular questioning. That's not saying what Amanda Knox did wasn't wrong, but is it indicative of a deliberate conspiracy to cover-up a murder? I don't know, but if that's ALL they have to connect her to this murder, then that's laughable. I think there is a difference between "We are going to kill this person and then blame it on person B." vs. "I gave a statement after being psychologically and physically tortured for hours and hours because I just wanted it to end." What she did was extremely unfortunate, and she was punished greatly for it. But, I don't care about that. I want that 'OJ' evidence that would even start to make the murder PLAUSIBLE. Not beyond doubt, even. Just plausible.

Once again, The Norfolk Four. Changed the way I look at police interrogations forever.
 
If you honestly think this girl is guilty you have a serious issue with judgement.

The case against her was so batshit insane it's up there with 9/11 truthers.
 
I don't know if she did it or not. I only know a girl has been killed and her assassins are still on the run. This is the only fact and one damn sad one

Naw her murderer is actually in jail he just got a reduced sentence for helping in the railroading of this girl.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom