lightless_shado said:. Won't be surprised if some countries in Africa copy this and Russia decides to try this.
article said:Besides, although China clearly wants its moment in the sun, it doesn't seem particularly eager or able to lead. "When was the last time Beijing offered its own peace plan for the Arab-Israeli conflict, for instance?" asks Jonathan Eyal, Europe correspondent for the Straits Times in Singapore.
catfish said:Seems like the article writer assumes china gives a shit about this.
Blackace said:Feels very 80s but replace China with Japan
ChiTownBuffalo said:China has yet to win me over with video games and cool robots.
"Hi there, I'm the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize winner! Say, I don't suppose you happen to know where the 2010 winner might be, huh?"Wii said:
says everything lol
Oh come on now it's not that bad in Europe :I There's still tons of people emigrating from Africa and the Middle East to us and the majority of people that live here choose not to leave so obviously this menacing xenophobia isn't scaring people off yet and for good reasons imo, shit simply ain't that bad. Also I'm not sure if China, or any East Asian country for that matter, is more tolerant towards minorities and their cultures/beliefs then Europe or the United States.lightless_shado said:One way they could remedy this is by encouraging those who have been driven away by the xenophobia in europe and israel to immigrate to china. Also you see some Chinese moving from China to Africa, the reverse should be happening as well.
spiderman123 said:and porn
delirium said:It's unknown to the public how much of the Chinese stealth fighter is stolen from American blueprints, but I remember reading a story about how when Lockheed did a security audit, they found like nearly all of their subcontractors had been subverted or something.
Anyway, the US military is moving away from manned planes and more into UAVs. There's a saying about manned fighter pilots: "The last American fighter pilot has already been born."
Blackace said:Feels very 80s but replace China with Japan
Apparently the internet has known about the J-20 and it's capabilities for months (around dec 2010 according to wikipedia) before the press caught on after the Chinese demonstration. I don't have any figured or anything just taking the impressions at their wordZenith said:There's no way of knowing that from a few seconds of footage. You can only go by "it looks cheap".
MrHicks said:except that japan could never realistically challenge the US's status and "overtake" them as the worlds superpower
china has that potential
You mean how it was prior to World War II?Sanjay said:Yeah you can just nuke Japan again unlike China, they have nukes
I never really understand the allure of being the worlds "superpower" in this day and age. Always comes off as a pissing contest between countries. I see the future with no one "superpower" but a collaboration between powerful countries.
spiderman123 said:and porn
Mega alliances squaring off != Capitalist nations cooperating through ever increasing globalizationMegadragon15 said:You mean how it was prior to World War II?
Interesting article; I think it needs to be contrasted with this NY Times article on the glut of college-educated students in China:_Xenon_ said:America shouldn't be afraid of China, instead you guys need to worry more about yourselves. This article just makes much more sense than the one in OP does:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-reich/the-real-economic-lesson-_b_811230.html
But you know, it's always easier to blame undervalued yuan, or human rights, or whatever crap that can be found outside America.
There's problem with the job market of course. There's also this problem that people tend to blindly believe they have a better chance to find good jobs in big cities and live a better life (Chinese version of America dream I guess). The reality is, Shanghai and Beijing are over packed by grads from other provinces and the real estate bubble only makes it worse. It's kind of funny because all of my non-Shanghai residing classmates have already built their family and paid off their houses while most of my Shanghai residing classmates are either still struggling with mortage, or thinking about moving back to their hometown.numble said:Interesting article; I think it needs to be contrasted with this NY Times article on the glut of college-educated students in China:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/12/world/asia/12beijing.html
From my experience, this isn't really hitting people from top-tier universities, maybe not even second-tier schools as I know college grads from second-tier schools that were able to get good jobs in Beijing. It's also good for Chinese companies since they can choose amongst a lot of over-qualified people for jobs. But tons of disgruntled college grads, even if they are from crappy schools, is still a problem, especially with the rising costs of living in the big cities.
I think people have been saying that China has been preparing to implode for the last 60+ years. With KMT, warlord, and non-friendly controlled areas at the onset, to the outbreak of the Korean War on its borders, to the Great Leap Forward (where millions died), Cultural Revolution (chaos everywhere), the unrest in the 80s that led to the Tiananmen Square protests, to the growing inequality, human rights, and gender imbalance (a problem I think is overstated) today. They are problems to be sure, but I don't think it will be a cause for some type of revolutionary implosion, especially given the increasing nationalism of the populace.charsace said:America has feared China for like the last 12 years. At the same time China itself has been preparing to implode. Some of the poor and disenfranchised citizens are starting to band together to make a grab for more (which they do deserve).
Some of those were implosions though. And it looks like something is going to happen again because of how globalization is taking shape there.numble said:I think people have been saying that China has been preparing to implode for the last 60+ years. With KMT, warlord, and non-friendly controlled areas at the onset, to the outbreak of the Korean War on its borders, to the Great Leap Forward (where millions died), Cultural Revolution (chaos everywhere), the unrest in the 80s that led to the Tiananmen Square protests, to the growing inequality, human rights, and gender imbalance (a problem I think is overstated) today. They are problems to be sure, but I don't think it will be a cause for some type of revolutionary implosion, especially given the increasing nationalism of the populace.
I guess I see an implosion as something more dramatic--where the Communists fall out of power or the country splits up.charsace said:Some of those were implosions though. And it looks like something is going to happen again because of how globalization is taking shape there.
Zefah said:I'm so sick of hearing people say this. Sure, ancient China was the major power in their region, but when did their influence ever spread across the globe? They got beat the hell down by multiple powers, and the China of today is very different than the various Chinese dynasties that have existed throughout history.
Ancient Chinese has always been a story of foreign powers coming in and ruling. The Jurchens, the Mongols, the Manchus, and later Europeans.tino said:I want to hear your definition of "beat down", beside the 20th Century and the Mongolians, China didn't get "beat down".
China has had an overall expension history. People generally dont realize two strength of China, 1: number of the population (literally, over coming a problem by keep throwing people at it) and 2: highly penetrative nature of the Confucism culture.
I think he was refering to the late 19th to early 20th century beat downtino said:I want to hear your definition of "beat down", beside the 20th Century and the Mongolians, China didn't get "beat down".
The "rule of law" language is what they've been on about since the end of the Cultural Revolution. The opposite is the arbitrary "rule of man" that characterized the Mao era. It's resonance lies more to domestic Chinese audiences and maybe foreign businesses. Basically, before the Cultural Revolution, governance was pretty arbitrary--for instance, there wasn't a criminal law code until 1979--they went 30 years where people were criminally punished without concrete criminal law codes on the book. There weren't even Tort Laws until 6 months ago, and no Contract Law until the early 1980s. No comprehensive labor contract law until 2008, and there still is no administrative procedure law, among other things. They want to move to a regime where actions have to follow laws, and not the whim of the leaders (the fact that laws are enacted undemocratically are a different issue though). So that's what they mean about being under a rule of law. That reduces corruption and arbitrariness and makes people confident that they know what actions constitute a crime, or that they can sue for injuries, or that businesses know that their contracts will be enforced, instead of having to get a government official to help you out. There's been more progress on this front in the richer areas than the rural areas.ElectricBlue187 said:Today Hu said "China intends to develop a socialist democracy and build a socialist country under the rule of law"
So I've heard this from Chinese govt a few times before and I do not get it. Everything I hear about China is that it's a hyper capitalist autocracy, is this a fact that is embarassing to the Chinese government? Do they have a fondness for the past socialist policies? Do they have an inferiority complex when it comes to democracy? Do they really expect us to believe that they have a socialist democracy like France or someshit?
ToxicAdam said:... or what is America afraid of?
I don't understand this sudden fear of China. Especially among the right, who seem to feign fear in Obama "kowtowing" to their delegation currently in Washington. If anything, we should be relieved that there is another economic superpower that can help alleviate the stress of having to shoulder the many economic/social problems that seem to flare up every year.
l