psynergylover
Member
we "invasion of the body snatchers" now?
He makes it sound like a parasite using host.
Pro Life is such a crock of horseshit as none of these fuckers give a damn about the child once its born. After that its fuck'em, but at least they were born! Then they fight tooth and nail against programs to help the poor, children, education and anything else that could probably help said children and children in general.
Oh we sure did, that was my bad. I searched for 'host' and not 'hosts' like I should have done. Stupid rookie mistake...
That analogy doesn't even make sense on its own. Hosts reserve the right to kick out unwanted house guests.
Oh we sure did, that was my bad. I searched for 'host' and not 'hosts' like I should have done. Stupid rookie mistake...
Yeah for sure. The article I linked and based this on was from late today but your point stands. Simple searching is usually what I do and is most of time enough. Clearly it wasn't this time... lolGeneral rule: if the article you are basing a thread on is more than an hour old, it almost assuredly has a thread.
Here's the thing though; invites can be retracted. I can host a party, invite people over, but I can kick anyone out of my own home at any time for any reason. So his whole analogy falls to pieces since 'invites' are up to the 'host's' discretion to rescind whenever they see fit.
Oh we sure did, that was my bad. I searched for 'host' and not 'hosts' like I should have done. Stupid rookie mistake...
Change "kick anyone out" to "kill everyone inside and then kick them out" and then your analogy works. Because that's what the guy is against, the killing of the new person "hosted" by the woman. You are fighting shadows as long as you don't understand the core of the issue as the pro-life people see it. There is zero chance of them understanding your side until you understand what their point is.
This "kicking people out from the party" analogy only proves you haven't understood what the core of their belief about this subject is. In their analogy the context is that once the invited person is inside the house the person can't live outside of the house anymore and it's 100% certain death if you remove that person too early.
Change "kick anyone out" to "kill everyone inside and then kick them out" and then your analogy works. Because that's what the guy is against, the killing of the new person "hosted" by the woman. You are fighting shadows as long as you don't understand the core of the issue as the pro-life people see it. There is zero chance of them understanding your side until you understand what their point is.
This "kicking people out from the party" analogy only proves you haven't understood what the core of their belief about this subject is. In their analogy the context is that once the invited person is inside the house the person can't live outside of the house anymore and it's 100% certain death if you remove that person too early.
Pro Life is such a crock of horseshit as none of these fuckers give a damn about the child once its born. After that its fuck'em, but at least they were born! Then they fight tooth and nail against programs to help the poor, children, education and anything else that could probably help said children and children in general.
That's what pregnancy is. Just because it's reproductive doesn't mean it's not a parasite/host relationship.He makes it sound like a parasite using host.
Well I mean that's how pro-choice people have been using the analogy for the longest time. I dunno why this guy thinks that leaning into the host/parasite thing is going to help his case.The analogy fails anyway if I invite you in, I can ask you to leave whenever I want and you have to go. If ya don't go I can even call the police and have you forcibly removed.
Well I mean that's how pro-choice people have been using the analogy for the longest time. I dunno why this guy thinks that leaning into the host/parasite thing is going to help his case.
You can't talk about people like that.
The kid might end up being Republican, after all.He makes it sound like a parasite using host.
That's what pregnancy is. Just because it's reproductive doesn't mean it's not a parasite/host relationship.
That's some fucked up reasoning though.
That hasn't been true for over 5 years. Here is one such available assay:http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc1113044#t=articleIt's bullshit because there's no safe way confirm the father of a child until it's gone a full term and born
the whole point is to try and delay the abortions more and more so they eventually force women to carry full term just from basically holding them at legal gunpoint.
So if someone goes "hey that's my kid in there", you file a thing in court, the woman goes through the pregnancy, pays the body price, then it turns out it wasn't his kid, he goes "oh well" and walks away
there's just so many wrong things about this idea in the first place..
I mean, he's kinda correct? But it doesn't make him any less callous towards the women who are the "hosts". They're people too.
This, all of this. It was already known that this is what they thought, but still astonishing to actually have one of them outright admit to regarding women as incubators rather than people.