MaestroMike
Gold Member
lol preeeettttyyy sure Apple likes going to court. Epic dun goofed
Ignorant people stay ignorant because of that exact mentality. "That guy" fights against anti consumer laws and fights for RIGHT TO REPAIR. Imagine being a consumer like yourself, and saying fuck your own rights, as a consumer?Didn't open the link but it's probably some lame fuck trying to make a quick buck on fresh hot 'breaking news'.
Fuck that guy too. And his cat
I love it. I would be delighted to see Apple and Google fall out with all the game publishers.
There's a reason they are the biggest spenders on micro transactions. Please keep them TF away!
Having Google and Apple getting as far away as possible from Videogames could be the best thing to come out of this.
Apple Accuses Epic Games of 'Willful, Brazen, and Unlawful Conduct' in Countersuit Asking for Breach of Contract Damages
As Apple and Epic Games prepare for a hearing on a preliminary injunction to decide whether Fortnite will be allowed back on the App Store as the...www.macrumors.com
Apple lawyers well full savage here it's well worth reading in it's whole
This part really needs to repeated because it shows whole hypocrisy of Epic behaviour
There is nothing anticompetitive about charging a commission for others to use one’s service. Many platforms—including Epic’s own app marketplace and Unreal Engine—do just that.
Should McDonalds have to let Burger King sell their burgers in every McDonalds store, where the burger king employees use the McDonalds owned and maintained equipment, and BK don't have to give McDonalds any money whatsoever? Does that sound fair?The anticompetitive part is Apple not allowing any other app content delivery services to compete on the ios platform, not the fact that they charge a commission to access their platform. The fact that there are no options besides Apple's App Store means that developers have no choice but to pay whatever commission Apple charges or not publish their apps on the platform at all.
As far as Epic goes there are other game engine options that developers can use to build games besides Unreal Engine and developers can publish their PC games on other marketplaces. It's hard to see how the no u accusation is valid here. There is no hypocrisy when there's no real comparison.
It feels a lot like Epic is about to make a push to try to put a version of their app store on iOS that they can use to sell iOS apps or add on content and charge a lower commission than Apple. Apple is absolutely going to look like the bad guy for fighting to not allow competition on their closed platform.
Didn't open the link but it's probably some lame fuck trying to make a quick buck on fresh hot 'breaking news'.
Fuck that guy too. And his cat
Should McDonalds have to let Burger King sell their burgers in every McDonalds store, where the burger king employees use the McDonalds owned and maintained equipment, and BK don't have to give McDonalds any money whatsoever? Does that sound fair?
That’s your opinion. I happen to enjoy Apple products very much thank you.Apple and Epic are cancer.
I hope they both waste hundreds of millions of £ in court battles.
It's not in the original terms, it's not how the OS got popular to begin with. Apple's idevices got popular by being Apple's vision exactly and haven't changed, it's apparently what a segment of consumers want compared to more open platforms like Android. If you don't want that, you don't buy an Apple device, it's as simple as that, there are alternatives. MS is free to try to make Windows 11 a closed ecosystem, and at that point it's most definite it will BOMB (just as they tried with Windows 10 S, it too bombed, so hard you forgot they tried this and the problem wasn't any lawsuit but the actual market not wanting it) and they will backpedal as people stick with 10, move to Linux or other OS that get a new lease of life by this development, and/or have legitimate lawsuits in regards to how they have changed the way they conduct their business (if for example they start cutting support for 10 yet provide no newer alternative). That's different. MS also has closed platforms like the Xbox with no legal/consumer issues whatsoever as you can see. So, they can do what they want, but for Windows, atm, the money's in it being open/keeping that 90% or whatever share. People might be able to pull a legit case against MacOS becoming a closed ecosystem as Apple plan for the next big version, but of course no monopoly stuff will apply there given Windows dominance. Still, it will be interesting to see (and largely unrelated to Epic's dumb bullshit here).So if on PC MS banned/did not allow any and all app like Steam, EGS, EA Access, etc... and any app and game not installed through the Windows Store you would be happy and cheering? I guess you would...
There is one huge difference. Epic is allowing use of other payments services for IAP and don't take one cent from payments like that.I’ve read it and wow. I mean I always thought Epic was in the wrong but not like this. What an awful company.
There is nothing anticompetitive about charging a commission for others to use one’s service. Many platforms—including Epic’s own app marketplace and Unreal Engine—do just that.
lol
Should McDonalds have to let Burger King sell their burgers in every McDonalds store, where the burger king employees use the McDonalds owned and maintained equipment, and BK don't have to give McDonalds any money whatsoever? Does that sound fair?
So if on PC MS banned/did not allow any and all app like Steam, EGS, EA Access, etc... and any app and game not installed through the Windows Store you would be happy and cheering? I guess you would...
Came to post this lmao
Neither company are your friend but it's funny that Epic thought they would win.
I mean.... it's Apple.
Should McDonalds have to let Burger King sell their burgers in every McDonalds store, where the burger king employees use the McDonalds owned and maintained equipment, and BK don't have to give McDonalds any money whatsoever? Does that sound fair?
That guy fights for youtube revenue.Ignorant people stay ignorant because of that exact mentality. "That guy" fights against anti consumer laws and fights for RIGHT TO REPAIR. Imagine being a consumer like yourself, and saying fuck your own rights, as a consumer?
Real genius huh?
so china vs china?china vs apple
No it is fact.That’s your opinion. I happen to enjoy Apple products very much thank you.
Well there’s a whole load of us soys.No it is fact.
Also only soys like you buy apple products.
"Bundling them [Windows and IE] is alleged to have been responsible for Microsoft's victory in the browser wars as every Windows user had a copy of IE."
Apple don’t have a monopoly. The anti trust against Microsoft was them doing things to maintain a monopoly.So you're saying this was a charade?
United States v. Microsoft Corp. - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Apple can't do anything wrong. To be clear, Epic are in the wrong here, and Apple can and should enforce the contract both parties signed, but at the same time we've seen anti-trust cases against microsoft in both the EU and US where their practices were not nearly as monopolistic as Apple's.
Hoeg law does a pretty good breakdown of the Apple countersuit. Good watch/listen if you have 80min. free.
Apparently, after Apple gave Epic 14days notice about reverting the changes back to how they were before or risk having their developer account removed, Epic completely disabled IAP and only offered the direct Epic payment option.
You're embarrassing yourself, please stopThat guy fights for youtube revenue.
Even 5 year olds know all companies are anti consumer. Only EU can force laws that make a good change, that's who you should be paging but even then those laws will only work in EU, everybody else gets a familiar shaft.
and it also shows that whole we do it for little guy shtick is nothing more than lie as possible repercussions for customers if Epic get's their own way could be extremely bad
This is fun. I think Epic will find itself in a hole with these lawsuits.
But they are not converging their "entire product line" around iOS. Their MAC computers are not part of the "walled garden" that you speak of.How so? From my standpoint Apple winning would be infinitely worse due to the way they are converging their entire product-line around iOS. Meaning that long-term the precedent would be set that having a walled garden around general purpose computing devices is ok.
But they are not converging their "entire product line" around iOS. Their MAC computers are not part of the "walled garden" that you speak of.
??? It looks like it is doing the opposite allowing iPad/iOS apps to be easily be ported to MAC. Isn't that providing more access to those apps instead of hiding them behind the iOS walled garden?Look up Project Marzipan, as well as their ongoing efforts to converge look and feel.
You're so polite for a stupid sub 5 year old.You're embarrassing yourself, please stop