Holy shitballs, this is not the outcome i was expecting
If more people have the courage to protest for what's right, yes, instead of hand wringing about the best way to do it by keeping everything orderly.OMG there's hope in the world?
Wow. I'm stunned it worked. Great news. Gives me a brief tinge of hope for the next four years.
It would be stupid of Trump to do something about it once he gets in. The protests as well as the attention got bigger and bigger. I don't know how he would be able to make himself look good if they were to get even stronger. All attention would be on him.
I did not expect this news and I did not expect to cry this hard about it.OMG there's hope in the world?
This gives me some hope that we can fight back against Trump and the GOP.Two thousand veterans showing up with the level of organization and determination they did was a game changer.
That said eff yeah at this result. Determination on this level will make a lot more victories like this possible. Keep up the fight and stay vigilant.
For people worried about Trump reversing it, it is after the January 1st completion deadline which investors can negotiate or terminate their contracts which is appearing to be quite likely:
http://www.honorearth.org/dapljeopa...iondec&utm_medium=email&utm_source=honorearth
Which is exactly why there's a good chance of it happening.
Spoiler alert: public displays and protests are how half of the shit in history has ever gotten done.
There will always be a score of people who clutch their pearls and wonder why the oppressed think they have the right to engage in all of this unpleasantnesss and disrupt the aesthetic of an orderly, quiet, stop-complaining-about-your-exploitation society.
Does he know a woman lost her arm protesting this? That the pipeline was set to go through an Indian reservation and there was a risk it could contaminate the local drinking water?
Why would investors be worried with the dumbest fucking man who ever lived soon to be sworn in and taking marching orders from dozens of people who would gladly send the riot police down upon the entire protest group?
Producers and shippers may well want to do that, because oil prices plummeted soon after the contracts were signed in 2014, and the economics of Bakken drilling are dismal now in comparison. Production has declined dramatically and continues to decline more each month, with no end in sight. As a result, there is no real need for the Dakota Access pipeline, because the existing pipelines out of the Bakken, combined with the capacity of local refineries, more than meet the demand of producers wanting to get their products to markets. And that doesnt even take into account the fact that some shippers will always choose rail because rail lines serve destinations that pipelines cannot.
In other words, Bakken infrastructure is already overbuilt, so shippers do not need the Dakota Access pipeline, and depending on the details of contractual terms, may well be interested in renegotiation with DAPL or even terminating their purchase agreements. This would put the project at risk of becoming a stranded asset, even before construction is fully complete.
Paul Ryan is basically a walking corporation who doesn't care about his impact on the environment.
Oh shit, Tomi Lahren is going to bust a nut. She's been a huge proponent of the pipeline.
Not to mention Trump is going to be put in power and as commander and chief can override the Army Corps decision.
This won't last.
Well, my happiness lasted less than 12 hours and my pessimism was right. Wake up today to see all the politicians throwing tantrums and shade at Obama, and the pipeline group saying they essentially don't give a shit what army corp of engineers say because they already got federal approval. Does the fight continue so soon or are these people raging simply to save face?
For reference:
http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161204005090/en/
Tl;dr, the company behind the pipeline are still planning to push it.
For reference:
http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161204005090/en/
Tl;dr, the company behind the pipeline are still planning to push it.
For reference:
http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161204005090/en/
Tl;dr, the company behind the pipeline are still planning to push it.
House Bill Number 1203 states that, "Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a driver of a motor vehicle who unintentionally causes injury or death to an individual obstructing vehicular traffic on a public road, street, or highway, is not guilty of an offense."
http://www.wptv.com/news/national/r...al&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=bufferRep. Keith Kempenich (R-Bowman), one of the bill's co-sponsors, told the Bismarck Tribune on Wednesday, "[The roads are] not there for the protesters. They're intentionally putting themselves in danger."
"It's shifting the burden of proof from the motor vehicle driver to the pedestrian," Kempenich said.
GOP in North Dakota are looking to change Motor Vehicle laws so people who "unintentionally" causes injury or death to people standing in the way of traffic would not be breaking the law.
http://www.wptv.com/news/national/r...al&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
GOP in North Dakota are looking to change Motor Vehicle laws so people who "unintentionally" causes injury or death to people standing in the way of traffic would not be breaking the law.
http://www.wptv.com/news/national/r...al&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
GOP in North Dakota are looking to change Motor Vehicle laws so people who "unintentionally" causes injury or death to people standing in the way of traffic would not be breaking the law.
http://www.wptv.com/news/national/r...al&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
GOP in North Dakota are looking to change Motor Vehicle laws so people who "unintentionally" causes injury or death to people standing in the way of traffic would not be breaking the law.
http://www.wptv.com/news/national/r...al&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
Fucking disgusting.GOP in North Dakota are looking to change Motor Vehicle laws so people who "unintentionally" causes injury or death to people standing in the way of traffic would not be breaking the law.
http://www.wptv.com/news/national/r...al&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer