Mandark said:
Because I think that the job of the presidency is so peculiar, and the requirements so differenty from year to year, that experience is not as important as it would be for other professions.
If a candidate can demonstrate understanding of an issue, can explain their position, and offer good ideas, that is important. Managerial skills are also important, though they don't seem to reliably transfer from other positions (governor, general, etc.) to the presidency.
Time spent engaged in learning/thinking about politics and policies is more important than time actually spent holding office. However, time spent holding office is very useful for indicating actual positions on issues.
Yeah, I see what you're saying, but how has Arnold proven that he's "spent time engaged in learning/thinking about politics"? My point is that he hasn't. He may well have been a closet political scientist all these years while filming T3 and True Lies, but there's nothing to indicate that that was the case. Further, if you assert that managerial skills are important (which I agree with), how are people to have any insight as to whether he possesses said managerial skills if not through time in office, or at least time in the public political eye where people can see how he deals with various situations and people? I dunno...the whole situation just seems crazy to me, for the reasons I've mentioned in the other posts; the whole fiasco strikes me as a bit too self-serving on everyone's part.
Like I said, though, if this amendment somehow gets proposed and gets passed, Arnold (imo) will be a
lock for the RNC nomination in the next election. And that-- in light of his paucity of experience and lack of political acumen-- would be a tragic situation, since there are enough dumb fucks in this country that'll vote for him simply due to his status and not his substance. It's bad enough that half the voters already make up their minds based on sound bites and a candidate's meticulously crafted "image"-- let's not give them a reason to show us even further idiocy in the next election by voting for a candidate who
wholly does not deserve to be there.
Propose and pass the amendment if you like, but delay its implementation for a decade or so. I just can't get over the fact that a man with ZERO experience, who only won the governorship due to his celebrity, has the audacity to push for a Contitutional amendment so that he can run for president this soon. It's just an outrageous situation imo.
Also, however, I don't see how "being a good statesman" can be considered a "quality that varies so much from year to year"--
those are the sorts of people we should be looking for first and foremost. Not overhyped and flimsy candidates like the Governator.