Before the alleged team and name was thrown around, I feared it would be an Essendon person knowing the matches last weekend. And from the "coaching panel" line I admit to thinking Wallis was a candidate. >.<
As for the $67 payout, thats a load of crap (typical from BF) since who in their right mind would have bet on Port to win any quarters of that match? Essendon were paying $1.01 so a quarter-by-quarter bet wouldnt have been a big windfall.
Not saying he did or didnt do it, just that the BF clowns are looking for the biggest odds and reporting a worst case scenario.
Still a stupid thing to do, but not as bad as the worst shit that has gone on in the game lately (eg tanking, sanctioned eye gouging and immunity for some players, cap cheating, riding shotgun with murderers, 'team bonding' and corruption from ex club presidents).