Still stuck around 25 million? Did I read that wrong? Thought it was at 25 end of last year.
It’s still growing by 28% YoY, so stuck isn’t a word I’d use.Still stuck around 25 million? Did I read that wrong? Thought it was at 25 end of last year.
Do you do Gold for MP gaming?Too expensive for the number of games I'd play on it. Every year I sign up for the $1 90 day trial and ever end up playing anything. Typical Gamepass games either aren't my type of games or they're so old I already bought them on sale before they were added to the service. The one singular exception is Forza Horizon 5, a game I don't own but would play on Gamepass, but it's not worth $15 a month when it will already be deeply discounted soon.
No idea about the other stuff you mentioned, it's not a noteworthy feature for my personal needs.
They probably over estimated growth plans due to covid zooming up growth for tech stuff thinking it would keep going. And MS never revised the growth targets down.73% sounds like what's known as an 'aspirational' goal.
Something that everyone knows isn't going to be achieved but is parroted anyway to try to motivate the organization. My experience is that they often have the inverse affect though.
It’s still growing by 28% YoY, so stuck isn’t a word I’d use.
It's in the document. Subscribers.Considering they expected 73% growth it can’t possible be about amount of subscriptions.
If they launched Starfield with Keystone then maybe. But all that is next year now. Still remains to be seen how that will play out, but the potential is there for new subs for sure.They probably over estimated growth plans due to covid zooming up growth for tech stuff. And MS never revised the growth targets down.
Do you do Gold for MP gaming?
If you do, just add on a years worth of GP for one month fee. You cant do the $1 deal anymore since you've already done GP.
Still stuck around 25 million? Did I read that wrong? Thought it was at 25 end of last year.
With last year growth being 7m, which was under their expectations. I expect the current numbers to be between 28m to 30m.
- Microsoft wasn't specific about subscriber target counts, but claimed delivery of "over 25 million Game Pass subscriptions."
With last year growth being 7m, which was under their expectations. I expect the current numbers to be between 28m to 30m.
If you arent a console MP gamer, then your costs to do it are the full pop. So yeah, it depends how much worth youll get out of it. But it's still cheaper to load up on Gold and apply a month's worth of GP fees, then doing GP monthly fees straight up.I don't. The types of games I enjoy in multiplayer aren't popular on modern consoles, so I haven't been a gold member for about seven years.
I've considered this and might try it for some unknown quantities, like Avowed and such further down the line.
Anyone remember the target last year?
By the numbers: For the 12 months that ended on June 30, Xbox Game Pass subscriber growth was up 37%, but the company had set a 48% growth goal.
- In the company's prior fiscal year, which ran from mid-2019 through mid-2020, Game Pass subs were up 86%, exceeding a target of 71%.
25m was their number in January this year.You don’t say “over 25 million” when you mean 28 to 30. It’s a ridiculous low ball.
They have a certain target growth, after each year. If the targets they set is something like extra 10m this year. This would make gamepass hit 35m userbase. That 10m is desired goal target.Yeah I don’t know about that. Do they mean total growth or growth vs previous year growth? Do they mean growth in subscription or growth in revenue? Considering they expected 73% growth that’s weird…
They claimed over 25 million GP subscribers in January regarding previous year. We’re entering November and still at 25? Phil Spencer talking saturation hello? How is there growth?
It has stagnated in terms of subscribers. They can still increase revenue of course, here comes the price hike.
Create a 'First party only' tier, and fully become third party and release all your games on PlayStation and Switch.
Won't happen.I think if they get acti this will happen. First party only game pass on PS.
these target growths are from July 2021 to June 2022.25m was their number in January this year.
28m to 30m is the estimate, according to these targets.
25m was their number in January this year.
28m to 30m is the estimate, according to these targets.
Yeah I don’t get it either, they were targeting 35M subscribers?
Either that was made before the Starfield delay or someone was feeling really ambitious when this target was set.
It says 'Xbox Game Pass subscribers growth' so its ain't likely to be revenue/dollar based imoThe targets are in dollar value, not subscription numbers.
The targets are in dollar value, not subscription numbers.
Disagree. Services benefit from being as many places as possible.Won't happen.
That is a death sentence for xbox.
Gamepass growth depend on the console right now. Making that move is erasing those growth.
It says 'Xbox Game Pass subscribers growth' so its ain't likely to be revenue/dollar based imo
Doesn't more users means more money?
I'm sure they'd be happy with GP on any system. But this fantasy of a "first party GP only" sub is probably never going to happen.D
Disagree. Services benefit from being as many places as possible.
What happened to January one?these target growths are from July 2021 to June 2022.
You referring the 4Foot note says dollars though.
Are you a subscriber or a dollar amount?
It says 'Xbox Game Pass subscribers growth' so its ain't likely to be revenue/dollar based imo
Sub = dollar. They see me as $$$.Foot note says dollars though.
Are you a subscriber or a dollar amount?
Sub = dollar. They see me as $$$.
If they are trying certain $$$, then that introduces problems for the data. Regional price, plus $$$ conversion would make it hard to count the userbase. Especially when they have PC, ultimate, normal gamepass.
Damn...going from a 72% prediction to an actual 28% is...something for sure.Document
It only benefits the console owners, which in this case is Sony and Nintendo.Disagree. Services benefit from being as many places as possible.
Damn...going from a 72% prediction to an actual 28% is...something for sure.
I honestly don't get how they expected it to grow so much? For sure at that point they knew their lineup right? Did they expect Starfield to really come out this year and do all the work?
Yeah, no clue what they were expecting there.I honestly don't get how they expected it to grow so much? For sure at that point they knew their lineup right? Did they expect Starfield to really come out this year and do all the work?
I can think of several stuff.Damn...going from a 72% prediction to an actual 28% is...something for sure.
I honestly don't get how they expected it to grow so much? For sure at that point they knew their lineup right? Did they expect Starfield to really come out this year and do all the work?
I have a feeling those targets were made BEFORE their big games were delayed not after. I am positive their plans weren't 'Let's release no games and expect major growth!"73% is an insane expectation when you aren’t putting out compelling content for a whole year. That’s on them and the management of their teams. 2023 should be better but what did you expect a full year of no first party games?
I have a feeling those targets were made BEFORE their big games were delayed not after. I am positive their plans weren't 'Let's release no games and expect major growth!"
Also they are saying they didn't reach their growth numbers meaning it grew but not at the rate they wanted? Interesting that even with them not growing at the rate they wanted they still made money? That is pretty impressive. Next year will be something to watch for sure.