Anton Sugar
Member
Updating now...what do you all think would be the best way to classify locations? Since we're using the location to determine. By region? By timezone?
Mr. Snrub said:Updating now...what do you all think would be the best way to classify locations? Since we're using the location to determine. By region? By timezone?
LordCanti said:Honestly it would be kind of silly to even break Europe up into two parts. I think we all know that if it's going in Europe, it's probably going in either the UK or a Nordic country. Ping times to the US from Eastern Europe would be...ehhhh.
Jtrizzy said:I just got into pc gaming, but I play BC2 with people around the world on PS3 and it seems to work fine. One 64 player server is going to be enough.
also, who is going to decide the game options? Maybe a 3 man panel can decide the on the various issues.
I am in the EST and will contribute to the server fund. We should incentivise (not sure how) for those who pay for 6 months or a years at a time. $5 per month is as high as I'm willing to commit to.
Jtrizzy said:also, who is going to decide the game options? Maybe a 3 man panel can decide the on the various issues.
In Unranked mode, player progression is not tracked on the master servers. Server administrators have free reign on such servers no Battlefield Rules of Engagement to heed. They can control in detail which weapons are available to the players, etc. This mode is suited to playing clan matches, tournaments, or to those players who just like the fairness of everyone having the same range of weapons available to them.
Mr. Snrub said:I think that most nights, we should have one mode + certain maps playing that we can all agree on as being "good". Maybe certain nights of the week/month we can have some custom matches set up.
Kyaw said:And that will be Conquest.
Can we mix Conquest and Rush together like some servers did in BC2?
Yaska said:Also could make me into Western Europe, as is rest of the Scandinavia
LordCanti said:Not without kicking half the players off the server we can't. I don't think 32 player Rush can co-exist with 64 player conquest on a server. It just wouldn't work in terms of player count.
If the server weren't full, I guess it would work. There's no way we can say "Okay guys, we're switching to Rush, and half of you are about to get booted" though.
Yaska said:If we get something like 20-30 persons who are ready to donate for Gaf servers, how about having a conquest and a rush server? That way we would have a 32 man server and 64 man server and both modes available for our use.
edit: with 20 donors the amount for 2 servers a month would be roughly 5,3 per person to have 2 servers. If we get more it'll be even less.
Foliorum Viridum said:A dedicated Conquest server is fine for me, personally.
I don't want to support two servers.
Foliorum Viridum said:A dedicated Conquest server is fine for me, personally.
I don't want to support two servers.
Jtrizzy said:switching to KB/M has been more difficult than I thought it'd be. Played BC2 300+ hours on PS3, so everything is counter intuitive even though I know the maps so well.
abuC said:
I might just use a controller.
abuC said:
I might just use a controller.
Jtrizzy said:switching to KB/M has been more difficult than I thought it'd be. Played BC2 300+ hours on PS3, so everything is counter intuitive even though I know the maps so well.
ph33nix said:Ah, sorry, I got my origin name wrong. Should be "ysbball812"
I'm also in TX...so US South?
Jtrizzy said:switching to KB/M has been more difficult than I thought it'd be. Played BC2 300+ hours on PS3, so everything is counter intuitive even though I know the maps so well.