Poor GRIMES
Banned
you should watch the original, I say. It's a great movie anyway, so just grab the Final Cut and watch it.
I think I will, just curious if I don't have the time
you should watch the original, I say. It's a great movie anyway, so just grab the Final Cut and watch it.
In regards to the Village Voice review, so having a more focused story than the original is a negative as it pertains to BR only? How would a retread of Scott's BR slipperiness have made it stand apart from the original and be less adherent to its legacy? Then some other reviewer would only point out that flaw for its unoriginality.
Ridley having to pass on directing 2049 himself and giving the reins over to Villeneuve was probably the best thing that could have ever happened to this movie.
I feel like I watched a different Blade Runner yesterday. Yes, there was subtext and themes but how was the story and storytelling of Blade Runner unorthodox and slippery?This review lowered my expectations. The unorthodox story telling of the first movie is one of the reasons it was so special imo.
It's a damn shame Blade Runner 2049 seems to be more mainstream in that regard.
I feel like I watched a different Blade Runner yesterday. Yes, there was subtext and themes but how was the story and storytelling of Blade Runner unorthodox and ”slippery"?
Now, thrusting the viewer into a story and having them play catch-up through dialogue and details is somewhat unorthodox but not uncommon, and the core story and storytelling of Blade Runner was surprisingly straight forward and simple. I kind of loved how simple and small the story was. Very slice of life, just another day in this city. Deckard has to find and deal with some escaped Replicants, while those Replicants seek out a way to extend their lifespan.
It's concise, simple, intimate, and aside from the scene with Tyrelll, feels insignificant against the larger scope of the world.
What are the ”slippery" aspects people are talking about?
I don't need or want it to be a copy of the first one. However, I expect(ed) a more unique way of story telling. Not something similar to every major sci-fi Blockbuster out there.
The final cutDid you watch the Director's Cut or the Final Cut?
The final cut makes a few very minor tweaks that start to reduce the ambiguity of the whole project. But I think some of these claims also come from people who don't watch that many noir films.
Well, I havent seen it yet but I doubt Villeneuve has delivered something that banal or typical given his track record.
His decision to direct the film differently than Scott doesnt automatically translate into some homogenized, artless pabulum.
The thing I'm getting is that Niander seems to be over the top. People who don't love the film talk about him feeling out of place and too monologue heavy.
People don't like readingIt's like... am I the only one who read the Variety review where they called it closer to Tarkovsky than Scott?
As this is a new thread and will undoubtedly have a wider readership than earlier threads on the same topic on this forum, here are links to three shorts commissioned by director Denis Villeneuve to bridge the gap between the 2019 of Blade Runner and the 2049 of this sequel.
The first is a 15-minute anime, and is set three years after the events of a Blade Runner.
Black Out 2022:
https://youtu.be/rrZk9sSgRyQ
Did you spot Edward James Olmos reprising his role from Blade Runner?
The other two are live action shorts, much shorter than the anime, introducing major characters you'll see in the sequel.
2036: Nexus Dawn
https://youtu.be/UgsS3nhRRzQ
2048: Nowhere to Run
https://youtu.be/aZ9Os8cP_gg
It's like... am I the only one who read the Variety review where they called it closer to Tarkovsky than Scott?
It's like... am I the only one who read the Variety review where they called it closer to Tarkovsky than Scott?
No argument here. Covenant kinda sealed that book shut for me in regards to the idea of Scott ever taking the reigns on the BR property. Or Alien for that matter
It's like... am I the only one who read the Variety review where they called it closer to Tarkovsky than Scott?
Wait, was that actually Edward James Olmos doing the VO for a 10s Gaff appearance in the short?
Wait, was that actually Edward James Olmos doing the VO for a 10s Gaff appearance in the short?
As this is a new thread and will undoubtedly have a wider readership than earlier threads on the same topic on this forum, here are links to three shorts commissioned by director Denis Villeneuve to bridge the gap between the 2019 of Blade Runner and the 2049 of this sequel.
The first is a 15-minute anime, and is set three years after the events of Blade Runner.
Black Out 2022:
https://youtu.be/rrZk9sSgRyQ
Did you spot Edward James Olmos reprising his role from Blade Runner?
The other two are live action shorts, much shorter than the anime, introducing major characters you'll see in the sequel.
2036: Nexus Dawn
https://youtu.be/UgsS3nhRRzQ
2048: Nowhere to Run
https://youtu.be/aZ9Os8cP_gg
Holy shit the Anime one is good... and feels important. Animatrix level stuff here.
The reviewer does concede that this sequel should stand on its own but does say that the way(s) 2049 references the original film makes viewing it from that standpoint difficult. A focused story is one thing (and not a negative thing) but you can still have that and maintain some of the elusiveness of the original without it coming off as overly reverent. Also, I think taking what the review actually said and re-labeling it as a "focused story" isn't entirely fair and doesn't take into consideration the whole of the criticism, which mentions a sense of the familiar with a string of sci-fi/fantasy blockbusters of years past and all the bad things that could imply.
But again, who knows, I haven't seen 2049 yet.
Mad Max Fury Road vs Blade Runner 2049
Which was the best revival topic soon !
That was all I gathered from the two paragraphs in the review (trying to tip-toe around spoilers) that too bad it couldn't be less like typical run-of-the-mill sci-fi with a chase/quest narrative, which is a pretty harsh criticism. Scott's BR was that too, but maybe in a less obvious or linear way? I have no idea. We definitely need to see 2049 first to sort out the criticisms!
Yeah that was a concern I had earlier which I brought up in one of the trailer threads. Feels like they're trying to channel Tyrell but it just doesn't feel the same. Tyrell's philosophical proclamations reveal his arrogance but also his sincere belief in his accomplishments which simultaneously gives credibility and undercuts what he says.The two most common criticisms I'm seeing are related to the script. The first is Niander clashes with the tone of the movie. He delivers lot of philosophical lines and monologue. Everybody else seems to be more lowkey. The second is that some plot points might not make sense. Some reviewers seem unsure so it might be arguable.
The OST appears to be fine at best but doesn't enhance the film.
Seeing it be called more of a chase movie compared to the languid super moody sci fi noir of the original is a bit disappointing. But that's to be expected now anyways and plus the trailers were already gearing us up for some of that
Glad to hear it's apparently pretty great though.
Edit: well only one review said it really. Pretty hyped for this one.
RT consensus is up at 97% https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/blade_runner_2049/
Theres one in particular that seems like a part of the general premise of the movie rather than being some crucial twist or major plot reveal, making it kind of hard to talk about the movie without mentioning itWhat's with some of these reviews containing spoilers? Like, christ critics, be respectful of your readers and write around major plot points or be vague as possible.
Besides that, I'm excited to read the positive reviews. My dad will especially be happy since he's a major BR fan.
What's with some of these reviews containing spoilers?
Excellent, mon boy Denis!
I didn't know that Craig wanted him to be the director for the next James Bond tho, could he put Dune on hold and make James Bond? Cause he surely can't do both right now.
I'll take Dune over another Craig bond like
Literally always
But would you take Cleopatra over Bond?I'll take Dune over another Craig bond like
Literally always
But would you take Cleopatra over Bond?
Its been a few years since I last watched Blade Runner but Im currently one hour into the Final Cut, and even if I am understanding the general plot much better, I have a little harder time following the detective work going on. Can someone explain this to me:
Deckard is in possession of a photo (I didnt pay enough attention to where he got it from, was it from the replicant girl who visited him earlier?) but what is it he sees when he zooms all the way in on a ladys chin in the mirror? Is it a snake tattoo connecting the stripper he eventually finds with the stripper club he pays a visit?