Branded
Member
Dread was OK by Mercury Steam standards but otherwise completely unremarkable. Horrible performance as well.Metroid Dread says no to this
Dread was OK by Mercury Steam standards but otherwise completely unremarkable. Horrible performance as well.Metroid Dread says no to this
It felt even more frustratingly linear than fusion which I wouldn't have thought possible but here we are.I bought Dread day one. It looks good and has excellent controls. But the only part of the actual game I thought stacked up were the no joke bosses. I have no desire to see or play the rest of the game ever again. Because it is a Mercury Steam game that isn't that great. Replace Samus with random character and everybody would agree and compare it unfavorably to Fusion.
I played the demo of this and it's definitely not a 5, unless it somehow strongly goes downhill after. This is an 8/10 game.
Fusion is awesome though and totally opens up in the end, and it is glorious. Dread sucks balls, worst level-design in the 2D series ever.Fusion
Fusion is awesome though and totally opens up in the end, and it is glorious. Dread sucks balls, worst level-design in the 2D series ever.
I approve this.Metroid Dread says no to this
Mediocre?! Game is greatWhile a step above most Mercury Steam efforts, Dread was still mediocre.
Hahaa epic exclusive. How dig do you want to deep your own grave?
What went wrong?These guys made Dread? lmao wtf
Explains why they took a bag for exclusivity at Tiny Timmy's failed EGS.
Going Epic exclusive it the biggest "We have zero faith in our product" sign posting move.
There is a demo on the epic store.These are the Castlevania guys, right? Is this an IGN thing or is it really that bad?
But 5 out of 10 is average—or at least, that's what I learned in math.
A demo is out…These are the Castlevania guys, right? Is this an IGN thing or is it really that bad?
Copying someone's work while upgrading the paper you copied it on is now graduating? LOLMercurySteam has been making games for Konami and Nintendo for over a decade and they still haven't figured out how to make good games. Even Bloober managed to graduate. wtf man…
there's some truth to that, now for japanese games the game-design or mechanics usually goes over their heads but for a western game like that, if they say the combats are simplistic i would bet they're rightThey gave Wanted Dead a 4. I pre-ordered that and Blades of Fire.
People really aren't okay with AA action games that try new things.
5 sounds about right if you usually score all games from 0 to 10, not from 7 to 10Maybe people complaining about IGN should first check out the game?
I've only watched a trailer of it, but man, it looked mediocre
5 sounds about right from what I saw
Most great YouTubers who have reviewed this game disagree; I opt to believe them.
That's what a remake is. They still built the game from scratch and it had damn good gameplay. Way better than the OG.Copying someone's work while upgrading the paper you copied it on is now graduating? LOL
I bought Dread day one. It looks good and has excellent controls. But the only part of the actual game I thought stacked up were the no joke bosses. I have no desire to see or play the rest of the game ever again. Because it is a Mercury Steam game that isn't that great. Replace Samus with random character and everybody would agree and compare it unfavorably to Fusion.
Kinda, because everyone expected for them to come short but the end result was great and many people love the remake more than the original.Copying someone's work while upgrading the paper you copied it on is now graduating? LOL
![]()
I bought the original Day 1 and if you actually played the remake and think it's such a simple fucking copy that magically appeared without starting completely from scratch, you're a dumbass.That's what a remake is. They still built the game from scratch and it had damn good gameplay. Way better than the OG.
It's a good remake but for me the best Silent Hill 2 version is still the fan made enhanced edition for PC,as it's the original vision with increased visual fidelity and qol improvements.Kinda, because everyone expected for them to come short but the end result was great and many people love the remake more than the original.
It is not that easy to nail remakes.
Sure but it's still copying at the end of the day. Not much of a graduation as you said.That's what a remake is. They still built the game from scratch and it had damn good gameplay. Way better than the OG.
It's a good remake but for me the best Silent Hill 2 version is still the fan made enhanced edition for PC,as it's the original vision with increased visual fidelity and qol improvements.
In a similar vein to the RE4 HD Project and the reason I don't like the RE4 Remake as much compared to the fan made HD project for the 2005 original as it keeps the soul of the game intact while upping the visuals considerably to the point that textures look better in the fan made remaster than the "Remake" and its washed up blurry visuals.
Sure but it's still copying at the end of the day. Not much of a graduation as you said.