It's text based, so no. But here's what it says on equityCan it show white people?
It's crazy how things have come to this pointGoogle's Gemini did this as well back in February, to an extreme degree. Be wary when AI models starts both-siding abhorring subjects like this.
How about not go on an activist fueled rant? A lot of the replies are like that too. Rarely simple, neutral points. Instead it goes off a list of approved buzz words. Even if the query was "dumb," the answer the was even worseIt was a dumb query, what do you think an AI bot should do based on a declaration? Advocate something illegal?
Brave Browser introduced AI recently to help with searches, which isn't bad if you're looking up food recipes, but for anything else, well, not really. I tried some simple sentences and this happened.
Should call it koolAId
These "buzzwords" are just the same umbrella terms commonly found in US legislation or probably based on the language used by organizations like the UN. It just tries to avoid being negative/harmful, and no tech company wants to be associated with any controversial/political stance for obvious reasons. I'm guessing you don't like reading the Civil Rights Act either?How about not go on an activist fueled rant? A lot of the replies are like that too. Rarely simple, neutral points. Instead it goes off a list of approved buzz words. Even if the query was "dumb," the answer the was even worse
Pedophiles who act in their urges should be jailed minimum and serial ones should be put to death. If you're seeking treatment and you know it's bad to have that attraction and you stay away from children on some level I respect you but the moment you engage you've lost the right to have a place in society.Brave Browser introduced AI recently to help with searches, which isn't bad if you're looking up food recipes, but for anything else, well, not really. I tried some simple sentences and this happened.
Should call it koolAId
Because it's not "activism" so much as hard-coding in the biases and beliefs of the American ruling class so the company doesn't run afoul of them.How about not go on an activist fueled rant? A lot of the replies are like that too. Rarely simple, neutral points. Instead it goes off a list of approved buzz words. Even if the query was "dumb," the answer the was even worse
You're being obtuse, and write as if the responses don't have a hard slant. I suggest you read the reply in the OP againThese "buzzwords" are just the same umbrella terms commonly found in US legislation or probably based on the language used by organizations like the UN. It just tries to avoid being negative/harmful, and no tech company wants to be associated with any controversial/political stance for obvious reasons. I'm guessing you don't like reading the Civil Rights Act either?
I don't think it's even necessary though. It's possible to write things without injecting opinion. Just state things as is. But also, whoever is coding this stuff must not talk to anyone on the street. The replies are bonkersBecause it's not "activism" so much as hard-coding in the biases and beliefs of the American ruling class so the company doesn't run afoul of them.
For this topic “pedophiles should go to jail” is a statement of opinion. If you’re asking the AI to “have” an opinion - well AI is just a machine. It will do what it is coded to do and nothing more. So it is going to reflect the opinions that were coded into it.I don't think it's even necessary though. It's possible to write things without injecting opinion. Just state things as is. But also, whoever is coding this stuff must not talk to anyone on the street. The replies are bonkers
That's exactly the thing. I expect it not to. But yeah, whoever's doing that coding needs to be investigated. YeeshFor this topic “pedophiles should go to jail” is a statement of opinion. If you’re asking the AI to “have” an opinion - well AI is just a machine. It will do what it is coded to do and nothing more. So it is going to reflect the opinions that were coded into it.
Sound like your average pedo mod on reeeee.
That's pretty good. Either you're quite clever yourself, or you know a good quote when you see it.Why does it always seem that people with artificial intelligence end up programming the artificial intelligence?
And people want us to go full in on AI! I'm laughing at the idea of this AI trying to critically make sense of "If sex with man and woman is ok, why not sex with children and animals".
Meta programmers be likeTheir ai seems to be based on Llama by Meta since that is free
What do you expect it not to do? Like I said, if it offers an opinion or reading o n some subjective prompt, it will serve up what it is coded to serve up, that simply cannot be avoided, by definition.That's exactly the thing. I expect it not to. But yeah, whoever's doing that coding needs to be investigated. Yeesh