Cocopjojo said:
Yes, that link is completely relevant and describes exactly the problem that people have with George Bush's public speaking abilities.
Cocopjojo said:
speculawyer said:Is this really our next big fear:
Being harassed by idiots in speedboats? Amidenajhad is having a laugh yanking Bush's chain. Let's start World War III![/QUOTE]
Because a speedboat stating that "will will blow you up," isn't a big deal.
USS Cole? Anyone remember?
I love you, GAF.
Cocopjojo said:You know, it's funny: intelligent people have always been known for their poor communication skills, and yet, that fact has always been overlooked when it comes to Bush.
Get off yer high horses, folks; he's a bad public speaker, but he didn't become President of the United States twice by being an idiot.
lolniceAnasui Kishibe said:after this incredible post, i'd tend to agree with the opposite you just said. Expressing opinions in a decent way doesn't really mean..you get it
APF said:Hey I'm in my office, at my laptop. Thinking about getting some lunch. Maybe I'll hit the gym first. There's like this cardboard thing at eye-level, I think it's to tack notes on or whatever. Also my jacket is on the back of my chair. I'd ask for a standing coat hanger but there's really not a good place for one here.
knitoe said:Were you paying attention to the news conference or maybe you are the one drunk? It was a two part question.
First part, ask Bush about what his security adviser means by serious consequences if Iran does it again regarding recent boat incident.
Second part, was for Olmert about why there was no three way meeting.
Cocopjojo said:Because a speedboat stating that "will will blow you up," isn't a big deal.
USS Cole? Anyone remember?
I love you, GAF.
Cocopjojo said:My favorite thing to do is to watch Bush's press conferences on boring stuff like the housing industry and bank loans and stuff like that... and then imagine all of the people that call him an idiot also watching and having no idea what he's talking about. Because most of them wouldn't. The man runs an entire country and people think he's an idiot because he's not the best public speaker ever and because they read in an e-mail that he has the lowest IQ of any president (hint: don't believe everything you read in a forwarded email).
Cocopjojo said:Because a speedboat stating that "will will blow you up," isn't a big deal.
USS Cole? Anyone remember?
I love you, GAF.
1) There is a big difference between noting that some intelligent people have poor "emotional intelligence" (to use the most common term I've seen in literature), and claiming that traditional intelligence and emotional intelligence are ALWAYS negatively correlated.Cocopjojo said:
castle007 said:
YES.castle007 said:
bob_arctor said:Hmm. He even laughs more intelligently than Bush. Quite the indictment. Good job, castle007.
gofreak said:..not that it really matters anymore. It'll all be over soon..!
White Man said:What are the chances the sick bastard starts a war with Iran before leaving office?
White Man said:What are the chances the sick bastard starts a war with Iran before leaving office? Not that his replacement will have anything easy, but kicking up a new war right before leaving will totally doom the next president into being a one termer.
that's an upper bound limit, right?Alien Bob said:
Such a lovely yet alien image to see these days: the US and Russian president laughing side by side.castle007 said:
GaimeGuy said:that's an upper bound limit, right?![]()
How can he be sure that a democratic will win? What if a republican wins?White Man said:If he can get us into a war with Iran before he leaves office, it will take at least the majority of the next presidential term to pull out, even if the procedure is begun immediately. Combined with Iraq being a total clusterfuck where exit probably won't even be a possibility for several more years, the next president can feasibly end up looking worse than Bush in certain lights, especially since the next Pres is going to have to spend a lot of policy time on domestic stuff since the current administration hasn't paid that much attention to that.
Basically, starting another war is a wise political move for Bush. It ensures that the next president, and the democrats, will only be in power for four years. Starting another war is minimizing damage for the Republicans, because they will pretty much be guaranteed the White House when 2012 rolls around.
Tieno said:Such a lovely yet alien image to see these days: the US and Russian president laughing side by side.
Times have changed.
Stinkles said:I dunno - Bush had a great relationship with Putin initially, then Putin went broken arrow. Hardly Dubya's fault. They used to dress up as cowboys together.
To be fair, the window where the US and Russian president would be laughing together was a pretty short one in the context of history.Tieno said:Such a lovely yet alien image to see these days: the US and Russian president laughing side by side.
Times have changed.
Tieno said:How can he be sure that a democratic will win? What if a republican wins?
Tieno said:How can he be sure that a democratic will win? What if a republican wins?
RobotChant said:Status quo remains. But if there is a war with Iran, the Republicans won't win.
Giuliani?White Man said:Also, it appears that none of the current Republican candidates are really in that deep with the Reagan/Bush camp that currently has the White House. I am assuming that the good ol' boys realize that they have to keep their tails between their legs for now, and that they can find, build, and hype a candidate for the next election.
Unlike many "funny vids" on the web this made me laugh out loud^^castle007 said:
-jinx- said:Giuliani?
I didn't mean it was one-sided. Both Putin and Bush seem more extreme and polarizing to me.Stinkles said:I dunno - Bush had a great relationship with Putin initially, then Putin went broken arrow. Hardly Dubya's fault. They used to dress up as cowboys together.
Seriously. Both Clinton andf Yeltsin were awsome. Just check out this video of Yeltsin doing a crazy dance. No chance in hell that Vlad would ever lighten the fuck up.Tieno said:I didn't mean it was one-sided. Both Putin and Bush seem more extreme and polarizing to me.
APF said:Chance of war with Iran is 0% unless Iran royally fucks something up.
Stinkles said:..is he drunk?
He seems waaaaaaay drunk.
WOW. He went off on a tangent about Iran after being asked about Palestine.
He simply stopped talking now.
WOW.
Now he's grinning and he turned bright red.
CharlieDigital said:This nightmare scenario pops up in my mind from time to time where he starts another war and declares martial law and delays elections. I tell myself there's no way he'd be able to pull that shit off in the US, but then again, this is the same country that elected a retard to two terms in the highest elected office in the US.
minus_273 said:WTF i just watched the clip in question on both BBC and Al-jazeera you just made this up.
speculawyer said:Besides Steven Hawking, can you name one? I really don't agree with this statement.
No, he got elected twice by a broken form of democracy where the guy getting less votes can win and idiots voting for him.
Making fun of his poor communication skills is just a side bar . . . it generally just as easy to make fun of the stupid things he says.
Is this really our next big fear:
![]()
Being harassed by idiots in speedboats? Amidenajhad is having a laugh yanking Bush's chain. Let's start World War III!
That's because Yeltsin was drunk 24/7 :lolDanielsan said:Seriously. Both Clinton andf Yeltsin were awsome. Just check out this video of Yeltsin doing a crazy dance. No chance in hell that Vlad would ever lighten the fuck up.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9e2lV0ar1Gc
Eric P said:you don't need a source
porky pig was the smartest loony toon and also the least capable at speech
bush has pretty much doomed the republican vote from here to 2016. I don't think there is anything else to say on that matter.Tieno said:How can he be sure that a democratic will win? What if a republican wins?