Tory has governed far more to the left than I expected him to.
How far right did you expect him to go exactly?
Tory has governed far more to the left than I expected him to.
Honestly I was expecting Rob Ford minus the crack... and minus the whole being an international embarrassment.How far right did you expect him to go exactly?
"to pursue business interests"
But of course.
I read that Trudeau's approval rating is unaffected by the fleeting elbow. It's a bit up actually.
I read that Trudeau's approval rating is unaffected by the fleeting elbow. It's a bit up actually.
All this needs now is Trudeau making an appearance on WWE
"Stephen Harper to resign as MP before parliament resumes in Fall"
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/stephen-harper-to-bow-out-from-federal-politics-1.3598913
To be completely honest I think he probably has a better shot than most people give him credit for. Arguably a better shot than almost any other candidate for ndp or CPC leadership out there right now, because Trudeau is still seen as an anti-establishment campaigner to some extent and you can't really fight that with establishment.
But realistically no one is going to beat Trudeau in the next election, and I really doubt Mr Wonderful would stick around long enough to try again. He'd leave the CPC a smouldering ruin.
The one caveat is that if trump wins this fall, his chances get much better. It's remarkable how much Canadian politics often seem to mirror American politics if you apply a bit of lag.
I read that Trudeau's approval rating is unaffected by the fleeting elbow. It's a bit up actually.
Not a fan of Trudeau (and Sophie Gregoire for that matter) and I couldn't care less about Elbowgate. A waste of time for all Canadians.I read that Trudeau's approval rating is unaffected by the fleeting elbow. It's a bit up actually.
Gutter was banned?
Half the reason I still go to this thread is to read irrational hatred towards Mulcair. It's a sad day.
Wynne went to the Alberta Legislature yesterday and the Wildrose ridiculed her. It was mostly Fildebrandt that was doing it, but half of the Wildrose members did not applaud her when she was introduced to the house during question period.Fildebrant also shouted at the Premier when she was trying to answer a question and asked why was Brad Wall not invited to the legislature.
http://calgaryherald.com/news/polit...by-opposition-wildrose-in-alberta-legislature
Wynne went to the Alberta Legislature yesterday and the Wildrose ridiculed her. It was mostly Fildebrandt that was doing it, but half of the Wildrose members did not applaud her when she was introduced to the house during question period.Fildebrant also shouted at the Premier when she was trying to answer a question and asked why was Brad Wall not invited to the legislature.
http://calgaryherald.com/news/polit...by-opposition-wildrose-in-alberta-legislature
cool, canada's only trump voter
Y'know, after reading some internet comments today, I honestly would not be surprised if half of Alberta would vote for Trump.
Only 26% actually. But it probably goes to 75% among angry internet commenters.
39% of the CPC voters. That's a nice base for O'Leary.
Of course marriage equality came up at the tory convention. Of course it did.
Only 26% actually. But it probably goes to 75% among angry internet commenters.
http://abacusdata.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Slide2-3.png
http://abacusdata.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Slide3-4.png
39% of the CPC voters. That's a nice base for O'Leary.
Only 26% actually. But it probably goes to 75% among angry internet commenters.
39% of the CPC voters. That's a nice base for O'Leary.
The motion to remove their opposition to it narrowly made it out of initial voting, to be discussed at their full convention tomorrow. The fact it's still in there now, after they had nearly a decade to do anything about it, is insane. Also a sign of how little official platforms really matter. But mainly insane.
Also insane: these screenshots from MPs onstage at the CPC Convention.
Arnold Viersen rapping:
Marilyn Gladu as the Grim Reaper for some reason:
Conservatives are weird.
EDIT: THERE'S VIDEO OF THE RAP!
It's every bit as awful as you'd imagine.
This disconnect is so weird to me that I find it hard to describe. We're talking about two human beings that love each other and want that to be recognized in the same way that it's recognized for everyone else. Somehow this is contentious. And that contention is why I'll probably never vote conservative. To be clear, there are other reasons why I wouldn't, but it's hard to even consider your platform when something so basic is still an issue.The motion to remove their opposition to it narrowly made it out of initial voting, to be discussed at their full convention tomorrow. The fact it's still in there now, after they had nearly a decade to do anything about it, is insane. Also a sign of how little official platforms really matter. But mainly insane.
This disconnect is so weird to me that I find it hard to describe. We're talking about two human beings that love each other and want that to be recognized in the same way that it's recognized for everyone else. Somehow this is contentious. And that contention is why I'll probably never vote conservative. To be clear, there are other reasons why I wouldn't, but it's hard to even consider your platform when something so basic is still an issue.
Thanks? lolMajor respect to Quebec. Bravo.
Only 26% actually. But it probably goes to 75% among angry internet commenters.
39% of the CPC voters. That's a nice base for O'Leary.
Bububut I thought Quebec was full of racist xenophobic people!
Conservative rap is as lame as I thought it would be. Someone should get Angry Tom or Nice Hair Trudeau to drop a diss track.
Yeah but trump doesn't speak french, so they won't vote for him
The Stephen Harper hashtag goes horribly bad (or hilariously good depending on who you ask) on social media
http://www.cbc.ca/beta/news/trending/conservative-party-hashtag-sarcastic-tweets-1.3602851
And of course the cons lied about a surplus before the elections.
http://www.financialpost.com/m/wp/b...showing-liberals-inheriting-2-billion-deficit
Y'know, after reading some internet comments today, I honestly would not be surprised if half of Alberta would vote for Trump.
He's actually very popular with my friends from Saskatchewan and Alberta.
I really don't like this new trend of writing news stories about what is being said by random people on twitter. It's such cheap "journalism" and it's really easy to cherry pick tweets to build a narrative one way or the other. It's the kind of shit you constantly see on Russia today. I would expect better from the CBC.
Fildebrandt got suspended from the Wildrose: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmon...nacceptable-comment-on-social-media-1.3604922
So Rona Ambrose made a "joke" at the CPC convention about Justin Trudeau being Canada's first female PM. I can think of at least three levels on which that's stupidly offensive.
So Rona Ambrose made a "joke" at the CPC convention about Justin Trudeau being Canada's first female PM. I can think of at least three levels on which that's stupidly offensive.
So Rona Ambrose made a "joke" at the CPC convention about Justin Trudeau being Canada's first female PM. I can think of at least three levels on which that's stupidly offensive.
Laura B's tweet resonates with me haha.The Stephen Harper hashtag goes horribly bad (or hilariously good depending on who you ask) on social media
http://www.cbc.ca/beta/news/trending/conservative-party-hashtag-sarcastic-tweets-1.3602851
Yeah, it's misleading bullshit as well as being offensive.I don't know why, but that comment annoys me because the Conservatives (alright, PC at the time) basically burned the title of Canada's First Female Prime minister by sending Kim Campbell in as Mulroney's sacrificial lamb after he essentially killed the party
Electoral reform must have public support: Liberal minister Monsef
WINNIPEGThe Liberals will abandon their plans to overhaul Canadas electoral system if they dont have widespread public support, Minister Maryam Monsef says.
But Monsef said its up for debate how exactly the Liberals will gauge public support on whatever new system they propose.
Frankly, thats the debate. And we will not proceed with any changes without the broad buy-in of the people of this country, Monsef told the Star at her partys policy convention in Winnipeg Saturday.
It means that there needs to be a conversation in the House of Commons including all parties. Its an opportunity for us to engage in debate about how to move forward in the 21st century.
So Canadians can rest assured that unless we have their broad buy-in, were not moving forward with any changes, Monsef later added.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has pledged that 2015 would be Canadas last election under first-past-the-post, a system that has governed Canadian elections since the country was formed.
Critics of the so-called winner-take-all system say it skews the will of voters, allowing majority governments to be formed without a majority of the popular vote. It could also lead to strategic voting, where voters sacrifice their personal preference to try and defeat a government.
The Liberals have faced criticism for failing to move quicker on the file, since Elections Canada needs years to prepare for a new voting system in 2019. Seven months after the Liberals formed government, a committee still has not been struck.
Monsef faced further criticism for proposing a committee where the Liberals would have the final say on any proposed system. When asked if she needs the support of at least one other party for the new system to have legitimacy, Monsef said the Liberals will continue to listen to Canadians.
Did you hear what the prime minister said today at convention? That we were elected to listen to Canadians? Monsef said. And well continue to do that. As far as any changes around democratic reform, were not going to proceed with any changes unless we have broad support.
Speaking to reporters earlier on Saturday, Trudeau was asked if the Liberals will need the support of at least one other party for their new electoral system to be legitimate in the eyes of Canadians.
Weve been working very, very hard to demonstrate that our approach is to listen to Canadians, to consult with Canadians, as we talk about the values that underpin our electoral process and ultimately our system of government, Trudeau told reporters. So how we make sure that were including questions and concerns people may have about various options is integral to be being successful in improving our electoral system.
Monsef told the Star that there are people within the Liberal party, both elected and not, who would prefer to see the first-past-the-post system maintained.
After all, the Liberals won a large majority government in 2015 with just under 40 per cent of the popular vote, as the Conservatives did in 2011.
Were a diverse party. You saw in (the convention) we have people from all walks of life, representing the diversity of this country, said Monsef. So its natural to have, within this group, a wide range of opinion. And I think thats what makes our party strong.
The New Democrats democratic reform critic, Nathan Cullen, said the lingering confusion about how the Liberals are handling the file are contributing to fears a new system would disproportionately benefit government.
Until we have a concrete understanding of how this is going to work, and how (Monsef) can calm the fears that the Liberals will simply force through a system that favours Liberals, until we have something real, then that suspicion will remain, Cullen said.
The words are nice, but the numbers (on the committee) dont lie.
Conservative critic Scott Reid could not immediately be reached. The Conservatives appear to support the status quo, but have demanded that any fundamental change to Canadas voting system requires a national referendum. The Liberals have resisted that call, saying referendums arent the only way to test the will of Canadians, but have not explicitly ruled out a national vote.
The New Democrats have long called for a form of proportional representation, which they argue would better reflect the will of voters. But Cullen has recently said that any improvement on the current system would be welcome.
Cullen also proposed a committee structure that would require at least one other party to support the Liberals proposal, an approach ultimately rejected by the Liberals, who say the committee has to reflect the current membership elected under first-past-the-post, despite wanting to ultimately change the system.