• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Cruise and Abrams back (co-produce) for MI4. Release date 2011

Status
Not open for further replies.
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/film/news/e3i6e2d5b09608cf35cc17d951f51c5ffae

J.J. Abrams and Tom Cruise are getting back in business with each other. The two have agreed to co-produce a fourth "Mission: Impossible" movie for Paramount with a potential 2011 release date.

Abrams directed Cruise in the third installment of the TV-derived franchise, which grossed $395 million worldwide in summer 2006.

But the future of the franchise was thrown into doubt -- at least in terms of Cruise's participation -- after Viacom topper Sumner Redstone discontinued his studio's long relationship with the star three months after the movie opened.

Relatively speaking, "MI:3" was a boxoffice disappointment, since the second film grossed $545 million worldwide and the original raked in $452 million.


Rumors circulated last year about a Paramount exec suggesting that Cruise would do well to merely produce another sequel and reboot the franchise with a younger star.

Though the ostensible meeting to discuss that scenario was denied by those who would know, the reteaming of Cruise and Abrams is intriguing for what it says -- or leaves unanswered -- about another installment.

Abrams has recently rebooted a moribund franchise by taking it back to its beginnings with a bunch of young, hot, relatively unknown actors. His "Star Trek," released six weeks ago, has grossed $335 million worldwide so far.

Though Abrams is not on board to direct the new "Impossible," he and Cruise could reconceive it in a way that is closer to the ensemble approach of the TV series.

Or they could reconfigure Cruise as Ethan Hunt in a less front-and-center role, as some kind of mentor to the new M:I crew. No writers have been hired to work on the fourth iteration of the franchise.

Then again, no one can rule out Cruise as the guy who will carry the franchise for the duration. He remains a bonafide star, having pushed the UA thriller "Valkyrie," saddled as it was with tons of bad media prerelease, to $200 million in worldwide grosses.

And Harrison Ford and Bruce Willis recently managed to carry their "Indiana Jones" and "Die Hard" franchises forward with a fourth blockbuster step -- and both have a number of years on Cruise, 46.

Cruise and Abrams are now committed to other projects.

Abrams is producing a "Trek" sequel for Paramount with Bad Robot partner Bryan Burk. Alex Kurtzman, Roberto Orci and Damon Lindelof are writing that screenplay for a potential summer 2011 release. He is also producing the comedy "Morning Glory" for Paramount, which has Ford, Rachel McAdams and Diane Keaton starring.

Cruise, a principal at UA, has been juggling potential starring roles in a number of projects, with an untitled Fox thriller the most likely. He would star with Cameron Diaz for director James Mangold.

But he has also been on the fence about "Motorcade," which Billy Ray has been writing for director Len Wiseman at DreamWorks, and "The Matarese Circle," which David Cronenberg is directing from a script now being reshaped by Paul Attanasio. Denzel Washington would co-star with Cruise in that MGM action thriller.

Reboot? Mentor?

tomcruiseclinchingmouth.gif
 

Keylime

ÏÎ¯Î»Ï á¼Î¾ÎµÏÎγλοÏÏον καί ÏεÏδολÏγον οá½Îº εἰÏÏν
In Abrams We Trust.

As crappy as it sounds in print, I imagine the execution will be good if Abrams is sticking his name on it.
 

ZeoVGM

Banned
No younger star. I want Tom in the main role and J.J. in the director's chair to match the awesomeness of MI3.
 

Dyno

Member
I thought the third was under-rated and the best of the series.

Goddamned fucking head bomb! I didn't sleep well that night!

The Alias vibe worked well in MI and the missions were the most impossiblest.
 

Keylime

ÏÎ¯Î»Ï á¼Î¾ÎµÏÎγλοÏÏον καί ÏεÏδολÏγον οá½Îº εἰÏÏν
...oh and more Michelle Monaghan! ...like lots more!

She looked incredible in that movie.
 

Ceres

Banned
I should see MI3 at some point. I enjoyed the original until I tried rewatching it and was bored out of my mind so I never bothered with the sequels.
 

Solo

Member
I love Tom Cruise.
I love J.J. Abrams.

M:I III sucked dick though.

Im not happy about this news, seems like a waste of both their time.
 
I thought MI:3 was the worst movie in the franchise (yes even worse than that piece of shit MI:2). It had me convinced Abrams couldn't direct a movie to save his life, but Star Trek proved me wrong by being pretty good. Still, MI:3 was a terrible terrible movie and I would have much rather have seen the Joe Carnahan version (yeah Smoking Aces sucked, but Narc was awesome).
 

andycapps

Member
Don't care about Abrams producing, I'm more interested to see who the director is. Still, loved 3 so I have high hopes for this. And yeah, Cruise is crazy, but he's still a great actor.
 
Abrams is awesome, MI3 was awesome. I'm in.

Maybe I'm so much of a fan of MI3 because it came after the shitfest that was MI2. I guess any movie could look good next to that.
 

jett

D-Member
Eh I dunno. MI3 was better than the second for sure, but still not as good as the first one. Maybe this is one franchise better left forgotten.
 
Replace the real Tom Cruise with the Wax version of him and it could be the best movie ever made.

conan-waxfigures.gif
 

critch

Banned
FTWer said:
WTF Where is this love for MI3 coming from? It was (rightfully) torn apart when it came out.

No it wasn't. It was well received, the best reviewed of the series. Which wasn't hard, but still. The only thing that hurt it was Cruise going nuts around that time. It did well enough that Paramount went to Abrams with Trek, which gave us one of the best sci-fi action films in years.
 

Dabanton

Member
MI:3 was a mess of a film,i can only imagine that people suddenly like it again because JJ Abrams is hot shit coming off of Star Trek and is currently gaf's darling director.
 

ZeoVGM

Banned
Dabanton said:
MI:3 was a mess of a film,i can only imagine that people suddenly like it again because JJ Abrams is hot shit coming off of Star Trek and is currently gaf's darling director.

FTWer said:
WTF Where is this love for MI3 coming from? It was (rightfully) torn apart when it came out.

What is this weird other dimension GAF lives in? M:I3 got good reviews, people loved it when it came out.

M:I3 kicks ass. Best action movie that year for me.
 

Lord Error

Insane For Sony
Why not, I liked MI3 quite a bit, and JJ keeps getting better and better as a director.

omg rite said:
What is this weird other dimension GAF lives in? M:I3 got good reviews, people loved it when it came out.
Yep. I'm pretty sure that if I'd watch all three MIs now, I'd like MI3 the best. Well, I know for sure I'd like it better than the 2nd one, as that one was a disaster.
 
Anyone else vastly prefer the first Mission Impossible movie to the others? That French woman is so fine...

The CIA infiltration scene? Ving Rhames? Jean Reno? Stick-gum bombs? Fuck yes.
 

DMczaf

Member
Blast Processing said:
Anyone else vastly prefer the first Mission Impossible movie to the others? That French woman is so fine...

The CIA infiltration scene? Ving Rhames? Jean Reno? Stick-gum bombs? Fuck yes.

You forgot the most important person of MI1

Emilio-Estevez-1.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom